2D Optimized electrode arrays for borehole resistivity tomography and CO 2 sequestration modelling

Pure and Applied Geophysics

Volumn 169, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1283-1292

  Hagrey, Said Attia al ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

CO 2 sequestration modelling; Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT); Electrode configuration; Geoelectric borehole survey; Model resolution; Optimization algorithm of electrode arrays; Optimized datasets

Indexed keywords

DATA SETS; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE ARRAYS; ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS; GEOELECTRIC; MODEL RESOLUTION;

ALGORITHMS; CARBON DIOXIDE; IMAGE RESOLUTION; SURVEYS;

OPTIMIZATION;

ALGORITHM; BOREHOLE; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; DATA INVERSION; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTRODE; GEOELECTRIC FIELD; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TOMOGRAPHY;

EID: 84863620883     PISSN: 00334553     EISSN: 14209136     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-011-0369-0     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Hagrey, S. A. Al (2009), 2D Optimization of electrode arrays for borehole surveys, 15th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Near Surface, EAGE, Expanded Abstract.
2. Hagrey, S. A. Al (2011), CO2 Plume modeling in deep saline reservoirs by 2D ERT in boreholes, The Leading Edge, 30 (1), 24-33.
3. Hagrey, S. A. Al and PETERSEN, T. (2011), Numerical and experimental mapping of small root zones using optimized surface and borehole resistivity tomography, Geophysics 76(2), G25-G35.
4. BARKER, R. D. (1989), Depth of investigation of collinear symmetrical four-electrode arrays, Geophysics 54, 1031-1037.
5. BAUMAN, P. (2005), 2-D resistivity surveying for hydrocarbons-a primer, Canadian Society of Exploration Society (CSEG) Recorder 30 (4), 25-33.
6. CARPENTER, E. W. and HABBERJAM, G. M. (1956), A tripotential method for resistivity prospecting, Geophysics 21, 455-469.
7. CLAERBOUT, J. F. and MUIR, F. (1973), Robust modeling with erratic data, Geophysics 38, 826-844.
8. COSCIA, I., MARESCOT, L., MAURER, H., GREENHALGH, S. and GREEN, A. G. (2008), Experimental design for cross hole electrical resistivity tomography data sets, 14th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Near Surface, EAGE, Expanded Abstract.
9. DAHLIN, T. (1996), 2D resistivity surveying for environmental and engineering applications, First Break, 14 (7), 275-283.
10. DAHLIN, T. and ZHOU, B. (2004), A numerical comparison of 2-D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays, Geophysical Prospecting 52, 379-398.
11. Day-Lewis, F. D., SINGHA, K. and BINLEY, A. M. (2005), Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution-dependent limitations, Journal of Geophysical Research 110, B08206, 17 PP., doi:10.1029/2004JB003569.
12. GOES, B. and MEEKES, J. (2004), An effective electrode configuration for the detection of DNAPL's with electrical resistivity tomography, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 9, 127-140.
13. GRIFFITHS, D. H. and TURNBULL, J. (1985), A multi-electrode array for resistivity surveying, First Break 3 (7), 16-20.
14. GÜNTHER, T., RÜCKER, C. and SPITZER, K. (2006), 3-D modeling and inversion of DC resistivity data incorporating topography-part II: inversion, Geophysical Journal International, 166, 506-517.
15. LOKE, M. H., WILKINSON, P. B., CHAMBERS, J. E. (2010), Fast computation of optimized electrode arrays for 2D resistivity surveys, Computers & Geosciences 36, 1414-1426.
16. LOKE M. H., ACWORTH, I. and DAHLIN, T. (2003), A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys, Exploration Geophysics 34,182-187.
17. LOKE, M. H. and BARKER, R. D. (1995), Least-squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections, Geophysics 60, 1682-1690.
18. MARESCOT, L. and LOKE, M. H. (2004), Using the depth of investigation index method in 2D resistivity imaging for civil engineering surveys, Proceedings of the Symposium for the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, 589-595.
19. MCGILLIVRAY, P. R. and OLDENBURG, D. W. (1990), Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the nonlinear inverse problem: A comparative study, Geophysical Prospecting 38, 499-524.
20. NOEL, M. and XU, B. (1991), Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: a preliminary study, Geophysical Journal International 107, 95-102.
21. RAMIREZ, A., DAILY, W., LABRECQUE, K., OWEN, E. and CHESNUT, D. (1993), Monitoring an underground steam injection process using electrical resistance tomography, Water Resources Research, 29 (1), 73-87.
22. SEATON, W. J. and BURBEY, T. J. (2000), Aquifer characterization in the Blue Ridge physiographic province using resistivity profiling and borehole geophysics, Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 5 (3), 45-58.
23. STUMMER, P., MAURER H. and GREEN, A.G. (2004), Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information, Geophysics 69, 120-139.
24. SZALAI, S., NOVÁK, A. and SZARKA, L. (2009), Depth of investigation and vertical resolution of surface geoelectric arrays, Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 14, 15-23.
25. WILKINSON, P. B., CHAMBERS, J. E., MELDRUM, P. I., OGILVY, R. D. and CAUNT, S. (2006a), Optimization of array configurations and panel combinations for the detection and imaging of abandoned mineshafts using 3D cross-hole electrical resistivity tomography, Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 11(3), 213-221.
26. WILKINSON, P. B., MELDRUM, P. I., CHAMBERS, J. E., KURAS, O. and OGILVY, R. D. (2006b), Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations, Geophysical Journal International 167, 1119-1126.