Numerical and experimental mapping of small root zones using optimized surface and borehole resistivity tomography

Geophysics

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Al Hagrey, Said Attia ^a   Petersen, Torsten ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b Goethe Schule   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRODES; ITERATIVE METHODS; MAPPING; SOILS; SURVEYS;

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; ELECTRODE CONFIGURATIONS; EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES; LABORATORY EXPERIMENTS; OPTIMIZATION APPROACH; OPTIMIZED CONFIGURATION; RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY; SPATIO-TEMPORAL RESOLUTION;

BOREHOLES;

BIOMASS; BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICS; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTRODE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; GROWTH RATE; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; PLANT; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RHIZOSPHERE; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; TOMOGRAPHY; TWO-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

HIBISCUS;

EID: 84857309671     PISSN: 00168033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1190/1.3545067     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Amato, M., B. Basso, G. Celano, G. Bitella, G. Morelli, and R. Rossi, 2008, In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multielectrode resistivity imaging: Tree Physiology, 28, 1441-1448.
2. Amato, M., G. Bitella, R. Rossi, J. A. Gómez, S. Lovelli, and J. J. Ferreira Gomes, 2009, Multi-electrode 3D resistivity imaging of alfalfa root zone: European Journal of Agronomy, 31, 213-222, doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2009.08.005
3. Carpenter, E. W., and G. M. Habberjam, 1956, A tripotential method for resistivity prospecting. Geophysics: 21, 455-469.
4. Claerbout, J. F., and F. Muir, 1973, Robust modeling with erratic data: Geophysics, 38, 826-844.
5. Dahlin, T., 2000, Short note on electrode charge-up effects in DC resistivity data acquisition using multi-electrode arrays: Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 181-187.
6. Day-Lewis, F. D., K. Singha, and A. M. Binley, 2005, Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution-dependent limitations: Journal of Geophysical Research, 110, B08206, doi:. 10.1029/2004JB003569
7. Ellis, R. G. and D. W. Oldenburg, 1994, Applied geophysical inversion: Geophysical Journal International, 116, 5-11.
8. Hagrey, S. A. al, 2003, The "GeoModel" at Kiel - A hydrogeophysical full-scale model for engineering geology to study pore water, contamination and structure of soils: 14th Meeting on Engineering Geology, Expanded Abstracts, 361-362.
9. Hagrey, S. A. al, 2007, Geophysical imaging of root zone, trunk and moisture heterogeneity: Journal of Experimental Botany, 58, 839-854.
10. Hagrey, S. A. al, 2009, 2D Optimisation of electrode arrays for borehole surveys: 15th European Meeting of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Near Surface, EAGE, Expanded Abstract.
11. Hagrey, S. A. al, 2011, CO2 plume modeling in deep saline reservoirs by 2D ERT in boreholes: The Leading Edge, 30, 24-33.
12. Hagrey, S. A. al, R. Meissner, U. Werban, W. Rabbel, and A. Ismaeil, 2004, Hydro-, bio-geophysics: The Leading Edge, 23, 670-674.
13. Hagrey, S. A. al, and J. Michaelsen, 2002, Hydrogeophysical soil study at a drip irrigated orchard, Portugal: European Journal of Environment and Engineering Geophysics, 7, 75-93.
14. Loke, M. H., I. Acworth, and T. Dahlin, 2003, A comparison of smooth and blocky inversion methods in 2D electrical imaging surveys: Exploration Geophysics, 34, 182-187.
15. Loke, M. H., and T. Dahlin, 2002, A comparison of the Gauss-Newton and quasi-Newton methods in resistivity imaging inversion: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 49, 149-162.
16. Loke, M. H., A. A., Fouzan, and M. N. M. Nawawi, 2007, Optimisation of electrode arrays used in 2D resistivity imaging: 18th Meeting of Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstract.
17. McGillivray, P. R., and D. W. Oldenburg, 1990, Methods for calculating Frechet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: A comparative study. Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 499-524.
18. Noel, M., and B. Xu, 1991, Archaeological investigation by electrical resistivity tomography: A preliminary study: Geophysical Journal International, 107, 95-102.
19. Petersen, T. and Hagrey, S. A. al, 2009, Mapping root zones of small plants using surface and borehole resistivity tomography, The Leading Edge, 30, 1220-1224.
20. Stummer, P., H. Maurer, and A.G. Green 2004, Experimental design: Electrical resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information: Geophysics, 69, 120-139.
21. Werban, U., S. A. al Hagrey, and W. Rabbel, 2007, Hydrogeophysical monitoring of root zone water content in the lab: Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 171, 927-935.
22. Wilderotter, O., 2001, An adaptive numerical method for the Richards equation with root growth: Plant and Soil, 251, 255-267.
23. Wilkinson, P. B., P. I. Meldrum, J. E. Chambers, O. Kuras, and R. D. Ogilvy, 2006, Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimised sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations: Geophysical Journal International, 167, 1119-1126.