An effective electrode configuration for the detection of DNAPLs with electrical resistivity tomography

Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 127-141

  Goes, B J M ^a   Meekes, J A C ^a  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; GRAIN SIZE AND SHAPE; GROUNDWATER; POROSITY; REMEDIATION; SEDIMENTS; SOILS; TOMOGRAPHY;

ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY TOMOGRAPHY (ERT); PERCHLOROETHYLENE (PCE); SEDIMENT LAYERS; SUBSOILS;

ELECTRODES;

BOREHOLE GEOPHYSICS; ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROMAGNETIC SURVEY; GROUNDWATER POLLUTION; NONAQUEOUS PHASE LIQUID;

EID: 4944230232     PISSN: 10831363     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4133/JEEG9.3.127     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bing, Z., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 2000, Cross-hole resistivity tomography using different electrode configurations: Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 887-912.
2. DHV, 1992, Nader onderzoek bodemverontreiniging Parallelweg 27 Coevorden, Chroomplating Production Coevorden B.V. (Intensive study of soil contamination at the Parallelweg 27 Coevorden, Chroomplating Production Coevorden B.V.), DHV - Consultancy and Engineering Firm, report: G-3162-01-001, Amersfoort, the Netherlands.
3. Dietrich, P., 1999, Konzeption und Auswertung gleichstromgeoelektrischer Tracerversuche unter Verwendung von Sensitivitätskoeffizienten (Conception and interpretation of DC-geoelectrical tracer experiments using sensitivity coefficients), Tübinger Geowissenschaftliche Arbeiten (TGA), C 50, 130 pp.
4. Fechner, T., 2000, SensInv2D - Manual and Software, Geotomographie, www.geotomographie.de.
5. Freenstra, S., and Cherry, J.A., 1996, Diagnosis and assessment of DNAPL sites, in Dense chlorinated solvents and other DNAPLs in groundwater, Pankow, J.F. and Cherry, I.A. (eds.), Waterloo Press, Portland, Oregon, 395-473.
6. Gautam, P., Pant, R.S., and Ando, H., 2000, Mapping of subsurface karst structure with gamma ray and electrical resistivity profiles: A case study from Pokhara valley, central Nepal: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 45, 97-110.
7. Greenhalgh, S., Zhou, B., and Zhe, J., 2000, Cross-hole resistivity imaging properties: Exploration Geophysics, 31, No. 1 and 2, 315-320.
8. Goes, B.J.M., Meekes, J.A.C., Verhaagen, P.A.A., Booi, H., and Stolzenburg, M., 2003, Elektrische weerstandstomografie voor het opsporen van DNAPLs (Electrical resistivity tomography for the detection of DNAPLs), SKB - Nether-Iands Centre for Soil Quality Management and Knowledge Transfer, report SV-416, Gouda, the Netherlands.
9. Iwaco, 2001, Integrale rapportage grondwaterverontreiniging (>5 m-mv) De Holwert te Coevorden (Integrated report on groundwater pollution (>5 m b. s.) for De Holwert in Coevorden), Stichting Coevorden Industriebelangen, Iwaco - Water Consultants - report 25380A, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
10. Kemna, A., Vanderborght, J., Kulessa, B., and Vereecken, H., 2002, Imaging and characterisation of subsurface solute transport using electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) and equivalent transport models: Journal of Hydrology, 267, 125-146.
11. LaBrecque, D.J., Miletto, M., Daily, W., Ramirez, A., and Owen, E., 1996, The effects of noise on Occam's inversion of resistivity tomography data: Geophysics, 61, No. 2, 538-548.
12. Newmark, R.L., Daily, W.D., Kyle, K.R., and Raminez, A.L., 1998, Monitoring DNAPL pumping using integrated geophysical techniques: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 3, No. 1, 7-13.
13. Ramirez, A.L., Daily, W.D., and Newmark, R.L., 1995, Electrical Resistance Tomography for steam injection and process control: Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 0, No. 1, 39-51.
14. Schneider, G.W., and Greenhouse, J.P., 1992, Geophysical detection of perchloroethylene in a sandy aquifer using resistivity and nuclear logging techniques: in Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP) Proceedings 1992, 619-628.
15. Slater, L., Binley, A.M., Daily, W., and Johnson, R., 2000, Cross-hole electrical imaging of a controlled saline tracer injection: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 44, 85-102.
16. Sullivan, E., and LaBrecque, D.J., 1998, Optimization of ERT surveys: in Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems (SAGEEP) Proceedings 1998, 571-581.
17. Weyting, K.R., van de Velde, A.H., van Zutphen, M., and Vasak, L., 2000, Karakterisatie van DNAPL-sites (DNAPLKAR), (Characterisation of DNAPL sites), NOBIS - Dutch Research Programme In-Situ Bioremediation, report 95-2-10, Gouda, the Netherlands.
18. Xu, B., and Noel, M., 1993, On the completeness of data sets with multi-electrode systems for electrical resistivity survey: Geophysical Prospecting, 41, 791-801.
19. Zutphen, M., van Hetterschijt, R.A.A., Valstar, J., Schuren, C., Eskes, S., and Brink, K. van den, 2000, First Partitioning Tracer test for DNAPL characterisation in the Netherlands, Groundwater 2000, pp. 141-142, Balkema, Rotterdam.