An integer-based score to predict functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke: The ASTRAL score

Neurology

Volumn 78, Issue 24, 2012, Pages 1916-1922

  Ntaios, G ^a,c   Faouzi, M ^b   Ferrari, J ^d   Lang, W ^d   Vemmos, K ^e   Michel, P ^a  

^a LAUSANNE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF THESSALY   (Greece)

^d MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^e ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (Greece)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE STROKE REGISTRY AND ANALYSIS OF LAUSANNE SCORE; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONSCIOUSNESS LEVEL; DISEASE REGISTRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EMERGENCY WARD; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH STROKE SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RANKIN SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL FIELD;

EID: 84863602156     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318259e221     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kasner SE. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006;5:603-612.
2. Muscari A, Puddu GM, Santoro N, Zoli M. A simple scoring system for outcome prediction of ischemic stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 2011;124:334-342.
3. Counsell C, Dennis M, McDowall M, Warlow C. Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models. Stroke 2002;33: 1041-1047.
4. Weimar C, Konig IR, Kraywinkel K, Ziegler A, Diener HC. Age and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Score within 6 hours after onset are accurate predictors of outcome after cerebral ischemia: development and external validation of prognostic models. Stroke 2004;35:158-162.
5. Quinn TJ, Dawson J, Walters MR, Lees KR. Functional outcome measures in contemporary stroke trials. Int J Stroke 2009;4:200-205.
6. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2011; 42:1482-1488.
7. Saver JL. Optimal end points for acute stroke therapy trials: best ways to measure treatment effects of drugs and devices. Stroke 2011;42:2356-2362.
8. Michel P, Odier C, Rutgers M, et al. The Acute STroke Registry and Analysis of Lausanne (ASTRAL): design and baseline analysis of an ischemic stroke registry including acute multimodal imaging. Stroke 2010;41:2491-2498.
9. Vemmos KN, Takis CE, Georgilis K, et al. The Athens stroke registry: results of a five-year hospital-based study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2000;10:133-141.
10. The Vienna Stroke Registry: objectives and methodology: the Vienna Stroke Study Group. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2001;113:141-147.
11. Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke: definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial: TOAST: Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment. Stroke 1993;24:35-41.
12. Ntaios G, Egli M, Faouzi M, Michel P. J-shaped association between serum glucose and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 2010;41:2366-2370.
13. Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, Royston P, Moons KG. Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model. BMJ 2009;338:b605.
14. German Stroke Study Collaboration. Predicting outcome after acute ischemic stroke: an external validation of prognostic models. Neurology 2004;62:581-585.
15. Konig IR, Ziegler A, Bluhmki E, et al. Predicting longterm outcome after acute ischemic stroke: a simple index works in patients from controlled clinical trials. Stroke 2008;39:1821-1826.
16. Ricci S, Celani MG, La Rosa F, et al. SEPIVAC: a community-based study of stroke incidence in Umbria, Italy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991;54:695-698.
17. Anderson CS, Jamrozik KD, Burvill PW, Chakera TM, Johnson GA, Stewart-Wynne EG. Ascertaining the true incidence of stroke: experience from the Perth Community Stroke Study, 1989-1990. Med J Aust 1993;158: 80-84.
18. Counsel C, Dennis MS, Lewis S, Warlow C. Performance of a statistical model to predict stroke outcome in the context of a large, simple, randomized, controlled trial of feeding. Stroke 2003;34:127-133.
19. Reid JM, Gubitz GJ, Dai D, et al. External validation of a six simple variable model of stroke outcome and verification in hyper-acute stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78:1390-1391.
20. Lewis SC, Sandercock PA, Dennis MS. Predicting outcome in hyper-acute stroke: validation of a prognostic model in the Third International Stroke Trial (IST3). J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79:397-400.
21. Baird AE, Dambrosia J, Janket S, et al. A three-item scale for the early prediction of stroke recovery. Lancet 2001; 357:2095-2099.
22. Johnston KC, Connors AF Jr, Wagner DP, Haley EC Jr. Predicting outcome in ischemic stroke: external validation of predictive risk models. Stroke 2003;34:200-202.
23. Johnston KC, Wagner DP, Haley EC Jr, Connors AF Jr. Combined clinical and imaging information as an early stroke outcome measure. Stroke 2002;33:466-472.
24. Johnston KC, Connors AF Jr, Wagner DP, Knaus WA, Wang X, Haley EC Jr. A predictive risk model for outcomes of ischemic stroke. Stroke 2000;31:448-455.
25. Duncan PW, Jorgensen HS, Wade DT. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials: a systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000;31: 1429-1438.
26. Saver JL. Novel end point analytic techniques and interpreting shifts across the entire range of outcome scales in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2007;38:3055-3062.
27. Lees KR, Hankey GJ, Hacke W. Design of future acutestroke treatment trials. Lancet Neurol 2003;2:54-61.