Accuracy of a newly developed open-source system for dental implant planning

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 128-137

  Dreiseidler, Timo ^a   Tandon, Daniel ^a   Ritter, Lutz ^a   Neugebauer, Jörg ^a   Mischkowski, Robert A ^a   Scheer, Martin ^a   Zöller, Joachim E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Computer aided implant placement; Computer aided surgery; Cone beam computed tomography; Implant dentistry; Surgical templates

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PROCEDURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; EVALUATION; FIDUCIAL MARKER; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL MODELS; FIDUCIAL MARKERS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE VALIDATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84863599287     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ewers R, Schicho K, Truppe M, et al. Computer-aided navigation in dental implantology: 7 years of clinical experience. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62: 329-334.
2. Mupparapu M, Singer SR. Implant imaging for the dentist. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70: 32.
3. Neugebauer J, Stachulla G, Ritter L, et al. Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for guided implant placement. Expert Rev Med Devices 2010;7: 113-129.
4. Fortin T, Champleboux G, Bianchi S, Buatois H, Coudert JL. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 651-656.
5. Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spuntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: Optical tracking vs stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 709-716.
6. Fortin T, Isidori M, Blanchet E, Perriat M, Bouchet H, Coudert JL. An image-guided system-drilled surgical template and trephine guide pin to make treatment of completely edentulous patients easier: A clinical report on immediate loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6: 111-119.
7. Hassfeld S, Muhling J. Comparative examination of the accuracy of a mechanical and an optical system in CT and MRT based instrument navigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;29: 400-407.
8. Sarment DP, Sukovic P, Clinthorne N. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical guide. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18: 571-577.
9. Birkfellner W, Solar P, Gahleitner A, et al. In-vitro assessment of a registration protocol for image guided implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12: 69-78.
10. Widmann G, Bale RJ. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-A review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21: 305-313.
11. D’Haese J, Van De Velde T, Komiyama A, Hultin M, De Bruyn H. Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: A review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 May 11. [Epub ahead of print]
12. DelBalso AM, Greiner FG, Licata M. Role of diagnostic imaging in evaluation of the dental implant patient. Radiographics 1994;14: 699-719.
13. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003;31: 825-833.
14. Tal H, Moses O. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991;20: 40-42.
15. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, Mosier KM, Ruprecht A, Shrout MK. Parameters of radiologic care: An official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;91: 498-511.
16. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: Preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998;8: 1558-1564.
17. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003;32: 229-234.
18. Visser H, Hermann KP, Bredemeier S, Kohler B. Dose measurements comparing conventional and digital panoramic radiography [in German]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 2000;4: 213-216.
19. Cohnen M, Kemper J, Mobes O, Pawelzik J, Modder U. Radiation dose in dental radiology. Eur Radiol 2002;12: 634-637.
20. Broer N, Fuhrmann A, Bremert S, Schulze D, Kahl-Nieke B. Evaluation of transversal slice imaging in the diagnosis of tooth displacement with special consideration of the upper canines. J Orofac Orthop 2005;66: 94-109.
21. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003; 96: 508-513.
22. Hagtvedt T, Aalokken TM, Notthellen J, Kolbenstvedt A. A new low-dose CT examination compared with standard-dose CT in the diagnosis of acute sinusitis. Eur Radiol 2003;13: 976-980.
23. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106: 106-114.
24. Dreiseidler T, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, Zoller JE. Comparison of cone-beam imaging with orthopantomography and computerized tomography for assessment in presurgical implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 216-225.
25. Ziegler CM, Woertche R, Brief J, Hassfeld S. Clinical indications for digital volume tomography in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2002;31: 126-130.
26. Nickenig HJ, Wichmann M, Hamel J, Schlegel KA, Eitner S. Evaluation of the difference in accuracy between implant placement by virtual planning data and surgical guide templates versus the conventional free-hand method: A combined in vivo - in vitro technique using cone-beam CT (Part II). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2010; 38: 488-493.
27. Schneider D, Marquardt P, Zwahlen M, Jung RE. A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template- based implant dentistry. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20(suppl 4): 73-86.
28. Dreiseidler T, Neugebauer J, Ritter L, et al. Accuracy of a newly developed integrated system for dental implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20: 1191-1199.
29. Mischkowski RA, Ritter L, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Keeve E, Zoller JE. Diagnostic quality of panoramic views obtained by a newly developed digital volume tomography device for maxillofacial imaging. Quintessence Int 2007;38: 763-772.
30. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104: 551-559.
31. Mischkowski RA, Pulsfort R, Ritter L, et al. Geometric accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam device for maxillofacial imaging. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104: 551-559.
32. Watanabe H, Honda E, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T. A comparative study for spatial resolution and subjective image characteristics of a multi-slice CT and a cone-beam CT for dental use. Eur J Radiol 2011;77: 397-402.
33. Liang X, Lambrichts I, Sun Y, et al. A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT. Part II: On 3D model accuracy. Eur J Radiol 2010;75: 270-274.
34. Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Guerrero ME, et al. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of threedimensional cone-beam images: A pilot study. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34: 816-821.
35. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: A clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24: 234-242.