A further analysis on the use of genetic algorithm to configure support vector machines for inter-release fault prediction

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1215-1220

  Sarro, F ^a   Di Martino, S ^b   Ferrucci, F ^a   Gravino, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

fault prediction; genetic algorithm; support vector machines

Indexed keywords

FAULT PREDICTION; FAULT-PRONE; GRID-SEARCH; MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES; SOFTWARE COMPONENT; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

GENETIC ALGORITHMS;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84863587280     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2245276.2231967     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Arisholm, E., Briand, L., Johannessen, B.: A systematic and comprehensive investigation of methods to build and evaluate fault prediction models. Journal of Systems and Software 83, (2010), 2-17.
2. Witten, I., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, 2nd Ed., San Francisco (2005).
3. Breiman, L.: Random Forests. Machine Learning 45 (1), (2001), 5-32.
4. Corazza, A., Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., Sarro, F., Mendes, E.: How Effective is Tabu Search to Configure Support Vector Regression for Effort Estimation?. In PROMISE Procs, ACM NY, (2010), 4.
5. Chang, C.C., Lin, C.-J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines, 2001. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm.
6. Chidamber, S.R., Kemerer, C. F.: A metrics suite for object oriented design. IEEE TSE, 20(6), (1994), 476-493.
7. Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., Sarro: A Genetic Algorithm to Configure Support Vector Machines for Predicting Fault-Prone Components. In PROFES Procs, LNCS Springer vol. 6759, (2011), 186-201.
8. Elish, K.O., Elish, M.O.: Predicting defect-prone software modules using support vector machines. Journal of Systems and Software 81(5), (2008), 649-660. (Pubitemid 351389562)
9. Goldberg, E.: Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison-Wesley, (1989)
10. Gondra, I.: Applying machine learning to software fault-proneness prediction. Journal of Systems and Software 81 (2008), 186-195.
11. Gray, D., Bowes, D., Davey, N., Sun, Y., Christianson, B.: Using the Support Vector Machine as a Classification Method for Software Defect Prediction with Static Code Metrics. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 43 (2009), 223-234.
12. Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I. H.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations, 11(1), (2009).
13. Jureczko, M, Madeyski, L.: Towards identifying software project clusters with regard to defect prediction. In the PROMISE Procs., ACM NY, (2010), 9.
14. Kitchenham, B., Pickard, L., Peeger, S.: Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE Software 12(4), (1995), 52-62.
15. Kotsiantis, S. B.: Supervised Machine Learning: A Review of Classification Techniques. Informatica 31 (2007) 249-268
16. NASA - Metrics data program. http://mdp.ivv.nasa.gov/
17. Ostrand, T. J., Weyuker, E. J.: How to measure success of fault prediction models. In the WSQA Procs, (2007), 25-30.
18. PROMISE Repository of empirical software engineering data, http://promisedata.org.
19. Vapnik, V.: The nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag, (1995).
20. Watanabe, S., Kaiya, H., Kaijiri, K.: Adapting a Fault Prediction Model to Allow Inter Language Reuse. In the PROMISE Procs, ACM NY, (2008), 19-24.