Using Online Studio Groups to Improve Writing Competency: A Pilot Study in a Quality Improvement Methods Course

Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 363-387

  Kovach, Jamison V ^a   Miley, Michelle ^a   Ramos, Miguel A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Online Collaboration; Online Writing Studios; Quality Improvement Methods; Rubrics; Writing in the Disciplines

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863583934     PISSN: 15404595     EISSN: 15404609     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4609.2012.00349.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. AACSB. (2010). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa, FL: AACSB International-The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business.
2. Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
3. ATMAE. (2009). Accreditation handbook. Ann Arbor, MI: The Association of Technology, Management, and Applied Engineering.
4. Bates, S. (2009). Communication is the key to motivation. Employment Relations Today, 36(2), 53-58.
5. Beaufort, A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
6. Berlin, J. (2003). Rhetorics, poetics, and cultures: Refiguring college English studies. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
7. Brewer, P., Friel, T., Davig, W., & Spain, J. (2002). Quality in the classroom. Quality Progress, 35(1), 67-71.
8. Bruffee, K. (1984). Collaborative learning and the conversation of mankind. College English, 46(7), 635-652.
9. Divoky, J. J., & Rothermel, M. A. (2009). Identification of Nonadaptive MBA Writers Through the Use of Linguistic Analysis. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 7(1), 37-50.
10. Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (2001). The Management and Control of Quality (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
11. Gabric, D., & McFadden, K. (2001). Student and employer perceptions of desirable entry-level operations management skills. Mid-American Journal of Business, 16(1), 51-59.
12. Grego, R., & Thompson, N. (2007). Teaching/writing in thirdspaces: The studio approach. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
13. Halasek, K. (1999). A pedagogy of possibility: Bakhtinian perspectives on composition studies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
14. Holter, N. C., & Kopka, D. J. (2001). Developing a workplace skills course: Lessons learned. The Journal of Education for Business, 76(3), 138-143.
15. ISO. (2010). ISO 9000 Essentials. Retrieved May 29, 2010, from
16. Langer, J. A., & Applebee, A. N. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
17. Levenburg, N. M. (1996). General management skills: Do practitioners and academic faculty agree on their importance Journal of Education for Business, 72(1), 47-51.
18. Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(3), 27-42.
19. Maes, J., Weldy, T., & Icenogle, M. (1997). A managerial perspective: Oral communication competency is most important for business students in the workplace. The Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 67-79.
20. Marcoulides, G. A., & Simkin, M. G. (1991). Evaluating student papers: The case for peer review. Journal of Education for Business, 67(2), 80-83.
21. McLeod, S. (2001). The pedagogy of writing across the curriculum. In G. Tate, A. Rupiper, & K. Schick (Eds.), A guide to composition pedagogies. New York: Oxford UP, 149-164.
22. Miller, C. R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151-167.
23. North, A. B., & Worth, W. E. (2004). Trends in selected entry-level technology, interpersonal, and basic communication scans skills: 1992-2002. Journal of Employment Counseling, 41(2), 60-70.
24. Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1994). Confidence and competence in writing: The role of self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and apprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(3), 313-331.
25. Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78-95.
26. Porter, M. E., Lorsch, J. W., & Nohria, N. (2004). Seven surprises for new CEOs. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 62-72.
27. Prater, E., & Rhee, H. S. (2003). The impact of coordination methods on the enhancement of business writing. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1(1), 57-71.
28. Quible, Z. K., & Griffin, F. (2007). Are Writing Deficiencies creating a lost generation of business writers? The Journal of Education for Business, 83(1), 32-36.
29. Rieber, L. J. (2006). Using peer review to improve student writing in business courses. The Journal of Education for Business, 81(6), 322-326.
30. Stevens, B. (2005). What communication skills do employers want? Silicon valley recruiters respond. Journal of Employment Counseling, 42(1), 2-9.
31. Stevens, D. D., & Levi, A. J. (2005). Introduction to rubrics: An assessment tool to save grading time, convey effective feedback, and promote student learning. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
32. Tague, N. R. (2005). The quality toolbox (2nd ed.). Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
33. Tanyel, F., Mitchell, M., & McAlum, H. (1999). The skill set for success of new business school graduates: Do prospective employers and university faculty agree The Journal of Education for Business, 75(1), 33-37.
34. Thaiss, C., & Zawacki, T. M. (2006). Engaged writers/dynamic disciplines: Research on the academic writing life. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
35. The Conference Board. (2006). Are they really ready to work? Employers' perspectives on the basic knowledge and applied skills of new entrants to the 21st Century U.S. Workforce. Retrieved December 12, 2011, from
36. The National Commission on Writing in America's Schools and Colleges. (2003). The neglected "R": The need for a writing revolution. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from
37. The National Commission on Writing in America's Schools and Colleges. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work...or a ticket out. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from
38. The National Commission on Writing in America's Schools and Colleges. (2006). Writing and school reform. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from
39. The National Writing Project. (2007). The 2007 survey on teaching writing: American public opinion on the importance of writing in schools. Retrieved February 7, 2011, from
40. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 249.
41. U.S. Department of Labor. (1991). What work requires of schools: A SCANS (Secretary's Commission on Achieving Necessary Skills) report for America 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor.
42. Warnock, S. (2010). Teaching writing online: how and why. Urbana, IL: NCTE.
43. Weber, J. M., & Lennon, R. (2007). Multi-course comparison of traditional versus Web-based course delivery systems. The Journal of Educators Online, 4(2), 1-19.
44. Wharton, G. (2002). Faculty perceptions of communication skills and needs of business school undergraduates in Singapore. Business Communication Quarterly, 65(4), 39-59.
45. Young, A. (2006). Teaching writing across the curriculum (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
46. Zorn, T. E., & Violanti, M. T. (1996). Communication abilities and individual achievement in organizations. Management Communication Quarterly, 10(2), 139-167.