The lived body in design: Mapping the terrain

Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 181-184

  Loke, Lian ^a   Robertson, Toni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

body; design; embodiment

Indexed keywords

BODY; DESIGN APPROACHES; DESIGN RESEARCH; EMBODIMENT; INTERACTIVE TECHNOLOGY; ON-BODY; RESEARCH ACTIVITIES; THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS;

INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84863526754     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2071536.2071565     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Antle, A. N., Corness, G. and Droumeva, M. What the body knows: Exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interacting with Computers, 21, 1-2 (2009), 66-75.
2. Blom, L. A. and Chaplin, L. T. The moment of movement: Dance improvisation. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pa., 1988.
3. Cranny-Francis, A. The body in the text. Melbourne University Press, 1995.
4. Djajadiningrat, J. P., Matthews, B. and Stienstra, M. Easy doesn't do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 8 (2007), 657-676. (Pubitemid 47617469)
5. Dourish, P. and Bellotti, V. Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces. In Proc. CSCW '92 ACM Press (1992), 107-114.
6. Dourish, P. Where the action is: The foundations of embodied interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 2001.
7. Gaver, W. W. The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. In Proc. CSCW '92, ACM Press (1992), 17-24.
8. Fogtmann, M.H., Fritsch, J. and Kortbek, K.J. Kinesthetic interaction: Revealing the bodily potential in interaction design. In Proc. OZCHI '08, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2008), 89-96.
9. Heath, C., Luff, P. and Sellen, A. Reconsidering the virtual workplace: Flexible support for collaborative activity. In Proc. ECSCW '95 (1995), 83-99.
10. Höök, K. Knowing, communication and experiencing through body and emotion. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies (October-December, 2008), 248-259.
11. Hummels, C., Overbeeke, C.J. and Klooster, S. Move to get moved: A search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11, 8 (2007), 677-690. (Pubitemid 47617470)
12. Jensen, M. V. A physical approach to tangible interaction design. In Proc. TEI '07, ACM (2007), 241-244.
13. Jacucci, C., Jacucci, G., Wagner, I. and Psik, T. 2005. A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In Proc. CC '05, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2005), 19-28.
14. Johnson, D.H. (Ed.), Bone, breath and gesture: Practices of embodiment. North Atlantic Books, Berkeley, CA, 1995.
15. Kirsh, D. Creative cognition in choreography. In Proc. 2nd International Conference on Computational Creativity (2011).
16. Klemmer, S. R., Hartmann, B. and Takayama, L. How bodies matter: Five themes for interaction design. In DIS '06, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2006), 140-149.
17. Klooster, S. and Overbeeke, C. J. Designing products as an integral part of choreography of interaction: The product's form as an integral part of movement. In Proc. DeSForM '05 (2005), 23-35.
18. Larssen, A.T., Robertson, T. and Edwards, J. Experiential bodily knowing as a design (sens)-ability in interaction design. In Proc. DeSForM '07 (2007), 117-126.
19. Loke, L. and Robertson, T. Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design. International Journal of Design 4, 2 (2010), 39-54.
20. Loke, L., Khut, G., Muller, L., Slattery, M., Truman, C. and Duckworth, J. Re-sensitising the body: Interactive art and the Feldenkrais method. International Journal of Arts and Technology (2011), in press.
21. Merleau-Ponty, M. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge, London, 1962 [France, 1945].
22. Mueller, F., Gibbs, M. R. and Frank, V. Towards understanding how to design for social play in exertion games. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 14, 5 (2010), 417-424.
23. Robertson, T. Embodied actions in time and place: The cooperative design of a multimedia, educational computer game. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 5 (1996), 341-367. (Pubitemid 126709709)
24. Robertson, T. Cooperative work and lived cognition: A taxonomy of embodied actions. In ECSCW '97, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA (1997), 205-220.
25. Robertson, T. The public availability of actions and artefacts. 11 (2002), 299-316.
26. Ross, P. R. and Wensveen, S. A. G. Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4, 2 (2010), 3-13.
27. Schiphorst, T. and Andersen, K. Between bodies: Using experience modeling to create gestural protocols for physiological data transfer. In Proc. CHI 2004 Fringe, ACM Press (2004).
28. Schiphorst, T. Self-evidence: Applying somatic connoisseurship to experience design. In Proc. CHI EA '11, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011), 145-160.
29. Suchman, L. A. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987.
30. Svanæs, D. Understanding interactivity: Steps to a phenomenology of human-computer interaction. PhD thesis, Computer Science, NTNU, Trondheim (2000).
31. Wilde, D. Swing that thing: Moving to move. In Proc. TEI 2010 (2010), 303-304.