Studies of dancers: Moving from experience to interaction design

International Journal of Design

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 1-16

  Loke, Lian ^a   Robertson, Toni ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Dance; Felt experience; Interaction design; Kinaesthetic; Movement

Indexed keywords

EID: 84892880224     PISSN: 19913761     EISSN: 1994036X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Blom, L. A., & Chaplin, L. T. (1988). The moment of movement: Dance improvisation. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
2. Boehner, K., Sengers, P., & Warner, S. (2008). Interfaces with the ineffable: Meeting aesthetic experience on its own terms. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(3), 35-63.
3. Brand, E., & Grunnet, C. (2000). Evoking the future: drama and props in user centered deign. In Proceedings of the Conference on Participatory Design (pp. 11-20). New York: CPSR.
4. Buur, J., Jensen, M. V., & Djajadiningrat, T. (2004). Hands-only scenarios and video action walls: Novel methods for tangible user interaction design. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (pp. 185-192). New York: ACM.
5. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York: Capricorn Books.
6. Djajadiningrat, J. P., Matthews, B., & Stienstra, M. (2007). Easy doesn't do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 657-676.
7. Ehn, P., & Sjögren, D. (1992). From system descriptions to scripts for action. In Design at work: Ccooperative design of computer systems (pp. 241-268). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Fiore, S., Wright, P., & Edwards, A. (2005). A pragmatist aesthetics approach to the design of a technological artefact. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense And Sensibility (pp. 129-132). New York: ACM.
9. Fraleigh, S. H. (1987). Dance and the lived body: A descriptive aesthetics. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., & Pacenti, E. (1999). Cultural probes. Interactions, 6(1), 21-29.
11. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
12. Henderson, K. (1991). Flexible sketches and inflexible data-bases: Visual communication, conscription devices, and boundary objects in design engineering. Science, Technology and Human Values, 16(4), 448-473.
13. Höysniemi, J., & Hämäläinen, P. (2004). Describing children's intuitive movements in a perceptive adventure game. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Multimodal Corpora (pp. 21-24). Paris: European Language Resources Association.
14. Hummels, C., Overbeeke, C. J., & Klooster, S. (2007). Move to get moved: A search for methods, tools and knowledge to design for expressive and rich movement-based interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 677-690.
15. Hutchinson, A. (1977). Labanotation or kinetography Laban: The system of analyzing and recording movement (3rd ed.). New York: Theatre Arts Books.
16. Jacucci, C., Jacucci, G., Wagner, I., & Psik, T. (2005). A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between sense and sensibility (pp. 19-28). Denmark: ACM.
17. Jensen, M. V. (2007). A physical approach to tangible interaction design. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 241-244). New York: ACM.
18. Jensen, M. V., & Stienstra, M. (2007). Making sense: Interactive sculptures as tangible design material. In Proceedings of the 2007 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 255-269). New York: ACM.
19. Jordan, B., & Henderson, A. (1995). Interaction analysis: Foundations and practice. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4(1), 39-103.
20. Klooster, S., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2005). Designing products as an integral part of choreography of interaction: The product's form as an integral part of movement. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (pp. 23-35). Newcastle: DeSForM.
21. Kyng, M. (1995). Creating contexts for design. In J. M. Carroll (Ed.), Scenario-based design: Envisioning work and technology in system development (pp. 85-107). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
22. Laban, R. (1971). The mastery of movement (3rd ed.). Boston: Play.
23. Larssen, A. T., Robertson, T., & Edwards, J. (2007). Experiential bodily knowing as a design (sens)-ability in interaction design. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (pp. 117-126). Newcastle: DeSForM.
24. Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., Jung, H., & Donaldson, J. (2007). Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces (pp. 239-254). New York: ACM.
25. Löwgren, J. (2007). Fluency as an experiential quality in augmented spaces. International Journal of Design, 1(3), 1-10.
26. Loke, L., Larssen, A. T., & Robertson, T. (2005). Labanotation for design of movement-based interaction. In Proceedings of the 2nd Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment (pp. 113-120). New York: ACM.
27. Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2007). Making strange with the falling body in interactive technology design. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement (pp. 164-175). Newcastle: DeSForM.
28. Loke L., & Robertson T. (2008). Inventing and devising movement in the design of movement-based interactive systems. In Proceedings of 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (pp. 81-88). New York: ACM.
29. Loke, L., & Robertson, T. (2009). Design representations of moving bodies in interactive, immersive spaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 67(4), 394-410.
30. McCarthy, P., & Wright, P. (2004). Technology as experience. London: MIT Press.
31. McCarthy, J., & Wright, P. (2005). Putting felt-life at the centre of human-computer interaction. Cognition Technology & Work, 7(4), 262-271.
32. Moen, J. (2007). From hand-held to body-worn: Embodied experiences of the design and use of a wearable movementbased interaction concept. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (pp. 251-258). New York: ACM.
33. Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., Krogh, P. G., & Ludvigsen, M. (2004). Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist's aesthetics of interactive systems. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 269-276). New York: ACM.
34. Schiphorst, T., & Andersen, K. (2004). Between bodies: Using experience modeling to create gestural protocols for physiological data transfer. In Proceedings of the CHI 2004 Fringe. New York: ACM. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from http://www.sfu.ca/amb4/iat320/Week%202/Between_Bodies.pdf
35. Schiphorst, T. (2007). Really, really small: The palpability of the invisible. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition (pp. 7-16). New York: ACM.
36. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
37. Shusterman, R. (2000). Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
38. Wright, P., Wallace, J., & McCarthy, J. (2008). Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 15(4), 1-21.