Models of scholarly communication and citation analysis

12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, ISSI 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 10-21

  Åström, Fredrik ^a,b   Sándor, Ágnes ^c  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^c XEROX RESEARCH CENTRE EUROPE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; SEMANTICS;

CITATION ANALYSIS; COMMUNICATING RESEARCHES; EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH; RESEARCH FIELDS; RESEARCH PAPERS; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; THREE CATEGORIES;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84863418032     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. Aït-Mokhtar, S., Chanod, J-P. & Roux, C. (2001). A multi-input dependency parser. In: Proceedings of the Seventh IWPT (International Workshop on Parsing Technologies), Beijing, China, 17-19 October, 2001. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.
2. Aït-Mokhtar, S., Chanod, J-P. & Roux, C. (2002). Robustness beyond shallowness: Incremental dependency parsing. Natural Language Engineering, 8(2/3), 121-144.
3. Åström, F. (2002). Visualizing library and information science concept spaces through keyword and citation based maps and clusters. In: Bruce, Fidel, Ingwersen & Vakkari (Eds.) Emerging frameworks and methods: CoLIS4 (pp. 185-197). Greenwood: Libraries Unlimited.
4. Åström, F. (2008a). Bibliometrics and educational research. Unpublished presentation: The European Conference on Educational Research (ECER 2008) in Gothenburg, Sweden, 11 September 2008.
5. Åström, F. (2008b). Citation patterns in open access journals. Unpublished project report: The OpenAccess.se program, The National Library of Sweden.
6. Becher, T. & Trowler, O.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Buckingham: SRHE & Open University.
7. Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects. The Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223-229.
8. Brun, C. & Hagège, C. (2003). Normalization and paraphrasing using symbolic methods. In: ACL: Second International workshop on Paraphrasing, Paraphrase Acquisition and Applications, Sapporo, Japan, July 7-12, 2003 (pp. 41-48).
9. Brun, C. & Hagège, C. (2004). Intertwining deep syntactic processing and named entity detection. Advances in Natural Language Processing. Volume 3230 (pp. 195-206). Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
10. Cronin, B. (1984). The citation process: The role and significance of citations in scientific communication. London: Taylor Graham.
11. Gibbons, M. et al. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
12. Hagège C. & Roux C. (2002). A robust and flexible platform for dependency extraction. In: Proceedings of LREC 2002 (pp. 520-523). Las Palmas, Canaria, Spain.
13. Hellqvist, B. (2008). Bibliometri och humaniora: En relationsanalys [Bibliometry and the humanities: A relational analysis]. InfoTrend, 63(3).
14. Hellqvist, B. & Åström, F. (2007). Visualizing the humanities through co-citation analyses. Unpublished presentation: 12th Nordic Workshop on Bbibliometrics and Research Policy, Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, Denmark, 13-14 September 2007. Retrieved January 18, 2009 from: http://www.db.dk/nbw2007/files/5b-Hellqvist-%C5str%F6m. pdf.
15. Klein, J.T, (1990). Interdisciplinarity: History, theory and practice. Detroit: Wayne State.
16. Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
17. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago.
18. Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.
19. Lisacek, F., Chichester, C., Kaplan, A. & Sándor, Á. (2005). Discovering paradigm shift patterns in biomedical abstracts: Application to neurodegenerative diseases. Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Semantic Mining in Biomedicine (SMBM) (pp. 41-50). European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, Cambridgeshire, UK, 10th -13th April, 2005.
20. MacRoberts, M.H. & MacRoberts, B.R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
21. Marshakova, I. (1973). System of documentation connections based on references (SCI). Nauchno- Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya, 2, 3-8.
22. McCain, K.W. (1986). Cocited author mapping as a valid representation of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(3), 111-122.
23. Merton, R.K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
24. Merton, R.K. (1974). The sociology of science. Chicago: The University of Chicago.
25. Mizuta, Y., Korhonen, A., Mullen, T & Collier, N. (2006), Zone analysis in biology articles as a basis for information extraction. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 75(6), 468-487.
26. Moravcsik, M.J. & Murugesan, P. (1975). Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5(1), 86-92.
27. Moya-Anegón, F., Herrero-Solana, V., & Jiménez- Contreras, E. (2006). A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: The SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research. Journal of Information Science, 32(1), 63-77.
28. Persson, O. (2001). All author co-citations versus first author co-citations. Scientometrics, 50, 339- 344.
29. Sándor, Á., Kaplan, A. & Rondeau, G. (2006). Discourse and citation analysis with conceptmatching. International Symposium: Discourse and document (ISDD), Caen, France. Retrieved 18 January, 2009 from: http://www.unicaen.fr/services/puc/article.php3?id-article=686.
30. Sándor, Á. (2006). Using the author s comments for knowledge discovery. Semaine de la connaissance, Atelier texte et connaissance, Nantes, June 29, 2006. Retrieved 18 January, 2009 from: http://www.sdc2006.org/ cdrom/contributions/Sandor.pdf.
31. Sándor, Á. (2007). Modeling metadiscourse conveying the author s rhetorical strategy in biomedical research abstracts. No. 2007-2 de la Revue Française de Linguistique Appliquée pp. 97-109.
32. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24, 265-269.
33. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8, 327-340.
34. Teufel, S. & Moens, M. (2002) Summarizing scientific articles: Experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational Linguistics, 28(4).
35. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A. & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. In: Proceedings of EMNLP-06, Sydney, Australia.
36. White, H.D. & Griffith, B.C. (1981). Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163-171.
37. White, H.D. & McCain, K. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355.
38. Whitley, R. (2000). The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: University Press.
39. Wouters, P. (1999). The citation culture. (Doctoral Diss.), Universiteit van Amsterdam. Retrieved 18 January, 2009 from: http://garfield.library.upenn. edu/wouters/wouters.pdf.
40. Zhao, D. (2004). A comparative citation analysis study of web-based and print-journal based scholarly communication in the XML field. (Doctoral Diss.), The Florida State University. Retrieved 18 January, 2009, from: http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd-09232003-012028/.