A core erythroid transcriptional network is repressed by a master regulator of myelo-lymphoid differentiation

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 109, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 3832-3837

  Wontakal, Sandeep N ^a   Guo, Xingyi ^a   Smith, Cameron ^a   MacCarthy, Thomas ^a,b   Bresnick, Emery H ^c   Bergman, Aviv ^a   Snyder, Michael P ^e,f   Weissman, Sherman M ^d   Zheng, Deyou ^a   Skoultchi, Arthur I ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Stony Brook University   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ChIP sequencing; Cross antagonism; Erythropoiesis

Indexed keywords

TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR GATA 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR KLF1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR PU 1; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR TAL1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FATE; ERYTHROID CELL; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPRESSION; GENE TARGETING; HEMATOPOIESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOUSE; MYELOLYMPHOID DIFFERENTIATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; RECEPTOR UPREGULATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION;

ANIMALS; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; ERYTHROCYTES; ERYTHROID-SPECIFIC DNA-BINDING FACTORS; GATA1 TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; KRUPPEL-LIKE TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; LYMPHOCYTES; MICE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PROTO-ONCOGENE PROTEINS; STEM CELLS; TRANS-ACTIVATORS; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84863264788     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1121019109     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Cole MF, Young RA (2008) Mapping key features of transcriptional regulatory circuitry in embryonic stem cells. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 73:183-193.
2. Boyer LA, et al. (2005) Core transcriptional regulatory circuitry in human embryonic stem cells. Cell 122:947-956. (Pubitemid 41345211)
3. Odom DT, et al. (2004) Control of pancreas and liver gene expression by HNF transcription factors. Science 303:1378-1381. (Pubitemid 38269432)
4. Cantor AB, Orkin SH (2002) Transcriptional regulation of erythropoiesis: An affair involving multiple partners. Oncogene 21:3368-3376. (Pubitemid 34587709)
5. Tsiftsoglou AS, Vizirianakis IS, Strouboulis J (2009) Erythropoiesis: Model systems, molecular regulators, and developmental programs. IUBMB Life 61:800-830.
6. Wadman IA, et al. (1997) The LIM-only protein Lmo2 is a bridging molecule assembling an erythroid, DNA-binding complex which includes the TAL1, E47, GATA-1 and Ldb1/NLI proteins. EMBO J 16:3145-3157. (Pubitemid 27234954)
7. Anguita E, et al. (2004) Globin gene activation during haemopoiesis is driven by protein complexes nucleated by GATA-1 and GATA-2. EMBO J 23:2841-2852. (Pubitemid 39013556)
8. Lahlil R, Lécuyer E, Herblot S, Hoang T (2004) SCL assembles a multifactorial complex that determines glycophorin A expression. Mol Cell Biol 24:1439-1452. (Pubitemid 38167068)
9. Rodriguez P, et al. (2005) GATA-1 forms distinct activating and repressive complexes in erythroid cells. EMBO J 24:2354-2366. (Pubitemid 41032587)
10. Gregory RC, et al. (1996) Functional interaction of GATA1 with erythroid Krüppel-like factor and Sp1 at defined erythroid promoters. Blood 87:1793-1801.
11. Merika M, Orkin SH (1995) Functional synergy and physical interactions of the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 with the Krüppel family proteins Sp1 and EKLF. Mol Cell Biol 15:2437-2447.
12. Fujiwara T, et al. (2009) Discovering hematopoietic mechanisms through genome-wide analysis of GATA factor chromatin occupancy. Mol Cell 36:667-681.
13. Yu M, et al. (2009) Insights into GATA-1-mediated gene activation versus repression via genome-wide chromatin occupancy analysis. Mol Cell 36:682-695.
14. Kassouf MT, et al. (2010) Genome-wide identification of TAL1's functional targets: Insights into its mechanisms of action in primary erythroid cells. Genome Res 20:1064-1083.
15. Tallack MR, et al. (2010) A global role for KLF1 in erythropoiesis revealed by ChIP-seq in primary erythroid cells. Genome Res 20:1052-1063.
16. Rekhtman N, Radparvar F, Evans T, Skoultchi AI (1999) Direct interaction of hematopoietic transcription factors PU.1 and GATA-1: Functional antagonism in erythroid cells. Genes Dev 13:1398-1411. (Pubitemid 29270245)
17. Rao G, Rekhtman N, Cheng G, Krasikov T, Skoultchi AI (1997) Deregulated expression of the PU.1 transcription factor blocks murine erythroleukemia cell terminal differentiation. Oncogene 14:123-131. (Pubitemid 27042962)
18. Pop R, et al. (2010) A key commitment step in erythropoiesis is synchronized with the cell cycle clock through mutual inhibition between PU.1 and S-phase progression. PLoS Biol 8:e1000484.
19. Rhodes J, et al. (2005) Interplay of pu.1 and gata1 determines myelo-erythroid progenitor cell fate in zebrafish. Dev Cell 8:97-108. (Pubitemid 40058009)
20. Wontakal SN, et al. (2011) A large gene network in immature erythroid cells is controlled by the myeloid and B cell transcriptional regulator PU.1. PLoS Genet 7:e1001392.
21. Dolznig H, et al. (2005) Expansion and differentiation of immature mouse and human hematopoietic progenitors. Methods Mol Med 105:323-344.
22. Soler E, et al. (2010) The genome-wide dynamics of the binding of Ldb1 complexes during erythroid differentiation. Genes Dev 24:277-289.
23. Cheng Y, et al. (2009) Erythroid GATA1 function revealed by genome-wide analysis of transcription factor occupancy, histone modifications, and mRNA expression. Genome Res 19:2172-2184.
24. Kerenyi MA, Orkin SH (2010) Networking erythropoiesis. J Exp Med 207:2537-2541.
25. Macquarrie KL, Fong AP, Morse RH, Tapscott SJ (2011) Genome-wide transcription factor binding: Beyond direct target regulation. Trends Genet 27(4):141-148.
26. Schoenfelder S, et al. (2010) Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet 42:53-61.
27. Novershtern N, et al. (2011) Densely interconnected transcriptional circuits control cell states in human hematopoiesis. Cell 144:296-309.
28. Tsai SF, Strauss E, Orkin SH (1991) Functional analysis and in vivo footprinting implicate the erythroid transcription factor GATA-1 as a positive regulator of its own promoter. Genes Dev 5:919-931. (Pubitemid 21906007)
29. Ogilvy S, et al. (2007) The SCL +40 enhancer targets the midbrain together with primitive and definitive hematopoiesis and is regulated by SCL and GATA proteins. Mol Cell Biol 27:7206-7219. (Pubitemid 47549756)
30. Kulessa H, Frampton J, Graf T (1995) GATA-1 reprograms avian myelomonocytic cell lines into eosinophils, thromboblasts, and erythroblasts. Genes Dev 9:1250-1262.
31. Visvader JE, Elefanty AG, Strasser A, Adams JM (1992) GATA-1 but not SCL induces megakaryocytic differentiation in an early myeloid line. EMBO J 11:4557-4564.
32. Iwasaki H, et al. (2003) GATA-1 converts lymphoid and myelomonocytic progenitors into the megakaryocyte/erythrocyte lineages. Immunity 19:451-462. (Pubitemid 37153420)
33. Zhang P, et al. (1999) Negative cross-talk between hematopoietic regulators: GATA proteins repress PU.1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:8705-8710. (Pubitemid 29354855)
34. Nerlov C, Querfurth E, Kulessa H, Graf T (2000) GATA-1 interacts with the myeloid PU.1 transcription factor and represses PU.1-dependent transcription. Blood 95:2543-2551. (Pubitemid 30210532)
35. Graf T, Enver T (2009) Forcing cells to change lineages. Nature 462:587-594.
36. Scott EW, Simon MC, Anastasi J, Singh H (1994) Requirement of transcription factor PU.1 in the development of multiple hematopoietic lineages. Science 265:1573-1577.
37. McKercher SR, et al. (1996) Targeted disruption of the PU.1 gene results in multiple hematopoietic abnormalities. EMBO J 15:5647-5658. (Pubitemid 26385624)
38. Back J, Dierich A, Bronn C, Kastner P, Chan S (2004) PU.1 determines the self-renewal capacity of erythroid progenitor cells. Blood 103:3615-3623. (Pubitemid 38596273)
39. Rekhtman N, et al. (2003) PU.1 and pRB interact and cooperate to repress GATA-1 and block erythroid differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 23:7460-7474. (Pubitemid 37271448)
40. Stopka T, Amanatullah DF, Papetti M, Skoultchi AI (2005) PU.1 inhibits the erythroid program by binding to GATA-1 on DNA and creating a repressive chromatin structure. EMBO J 24:3712-3723. (Pubitemid 41581688)
41. Hodge D, et al. (2006) A global role for EKLF in definitive and primitive erythropoiesis. Blood 107:3359-3370.
42. Chou ST, et al. (2009) Graded repression of PU.1/Sfpi1 gene transcription by GATA factors regulates hematopoietic cell fate. Blood 114:983-994.
43. Alon U (2007) Network motifs: Theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 8:450-461.
44. Wang J, et al. (2006) A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 444:364-368. (Pubitemid 44764111)
45. Choe KS, Ujhelly O, Wontakal SN, Skoultchi AI (2010) PU.1 directly regulates cdk6 gene expression, linking the cell proliferation and differentiation programs in erythroid cells. J Biol Chem 285:3044-3052.
46. Im H, et al. (2005) Chromatin domain activation via GATA-1 utilization of a small subset of dispersed GATA motifs within a broad chromosomal region. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:17065-17070. (Pubitemid 41692684)
47. Robertson G, et al. (2007) Genome-wide profiles of STAT1 DNA association using chromatin immunoprecipitation and massively parallel sequencing. Nat Methods 4:651-657. (Pubitemid 47202477)