Changes across time in spike rate and spike amplitude of auditory nerve fibers stimulated by electric pulse trains

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 356-372

  Zhang, Fawen ^a   Miller, Charles A ^a,b   Robinson, Barbara K ^a   Abbas, Paul J ^a,b   Hu, Ning ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Auditory nerve; Cat; Cochlear implant; Electric stimulation; Single fiber

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ADAPTATION; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CAT; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC CURRENT; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HAIR CELL; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; MEASUREMENT; NERVE FIBER MEMBRANE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPIKE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; CATS; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 34547657395     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-007-0086-7     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Babalian AL, Ryugo DK, Rouiller EM. Discharge properties of identified cochlear nucleus neurons and auditory nerve fibers in response to repetitive electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. Exp Brain Res. 153:452-460, 2003.
2. BeMent SL, Ranck JB, Jr. A quantitative study of electrical stimulation of central myelinated fibers. Exp. Neurol. 24:147-170, 1969a.
3. BeMent SL, Ranck JB, Jr. A model for electrical stimulation of central myelinated fibers with monopolar electrodes. Exp. Neurol. 24:171-186, 1969b.
4. Bevington PR. Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences. New York, McGraw-Hill, 1969.
5. Briaire JJ, Frijns JH. Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear Res. 205:143-156, 2005.
6. Bruce IC, White MW, Irlicht LS, O'Leary SJ, Clark GM. The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:1393-1404, 1999.
7. Cartee LA. Spiral ganglion cell site of excitation: II. Numerical model analysis. Hear Res. 215:22-30, 2006.
8. Cartee LA, van den Honert C, Finley CC, Miller RL. Evaluation of a model of the cochlear neural membrane. I. Physiological measurement of membrane characteristics in response to intrameatal electrical stimulation. Hear Res. 146:143-152, 2000.
9. Chimento TC, Schreiner CE. Adaptation and recovery from adaptation in single fiber responses of the cat auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:263-273, 1991.
10. Colombo J, Parkins CW. A model of electrical excitation of the mammalian auditory-nerve neuron. Hear Res. 31:287-311, 1987.
11. Cooper NP, Robertson D, Yates GK. Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics. J. Neurophysiol. 70:370-386, 1993.
12. Dynes SB, Delgutte B. Phase-locking of auditory-nerve discharges to sinusoidal electric stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 58:79-90, 1992.
13. Dynes SBC. Discharge characteristics of auditory nerve fibers for pulsatile electrical stimuli Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1996.
14. Eggermont JJ. Peripheral auditory adaptation and fatigue: a model oriented review. Hear Res. 18:57-71, 1985.
15. Finley CC, Wilson BS, White MW. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: Miller JM and Spelman FA (eds) Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. New York, Springer-Verlag, 1990.
16. Frijns JH, Briaire JJ, Grote JJ. The importance of human cochlear anatomy for the results of modiolus-hugging multichannel cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 22:340-349, 2001.
17. Gaumond RP, Kim DO, Molnar CE. Response of cochlear nerve fibers to brief acoustic stimuli: role of discharge-history effects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 74:1392-1398, 1983.
18. Hartmann R, Topp G, Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear Res. 13:47-62, 1984.
19. Javel E, Tong YC, Shepherd RK, Clark GM. Responses of cat auditory nerve fibers to biphasic electrical current pulses. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 96 (Suppl. 128):26-30, 1987.
20. Javel E. Acoustic and electrical encoding of temporal information. In: Miller JM and Spelman FA (eds) Cochlear Implants. Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear. New York, Springer-Verlag, pp. 247-295, 1990.
21. Javel E. Long-term adaptation in cat auditory-nerve fiber responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1040-1052, 1996.
22. Javel E, Shepherd RK. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure. Hear Res. 140:45-76, 2000.
23. Kiang NY, Watanabe T, Thomas EC, Clark LF. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve. Cambridge, MIT Press, 1965.
24. Killian MJP (1994) Excitability of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Doctoral thesis, Utrecht University.
25. Liang DH, Lusted HS, White RL. The nerve-electrode interface of the cochlear implant: current spread. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 46:35-43, 1999.
26. Liberman MC, Oliver ME. Morphometry of intracellularly labeled neurons of the auditory nerve: correlations with functional properties. J. Comp. Neurol. 223:163-176, 1984.
27. Litvak L, Delgutte B, Eddington D. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electric stimulation: modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110:368-379, 2001.
28. Litvak LM. Towards a better sound processor for cochlear implants: Auditory-nerve responses to high-rate electric pulse trains. Doctoral thesis. Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2002.
29. Litvak LM, Smith ZM, Delgutte B, Eddington DK. Desynchronization of electrically evoked auditory-nerve activity by high-frequency pulse trains of long duration. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2066-2078, 2003.
30. McNeal DR. Analysis of a model for excitation of myelinated nerve. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 23:329-337, 1976.
31. Meddis R. Simulation of mechanical to neural transduction in the auditory receptor. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:702-711, 1986.
32. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK, Rubinstein JT, Matsuoka AJ. Electrically evoked single-fiber action potentials from cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear Res. 130:197-218, 1999.
33. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Robinson BK. Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:216-232, 2001.
34. Miller CA, Abbas PJ, Nourski KV, Hu N, Robinson BK. Electrode configuration influences action potential initiation site and ensemble stochastic response properties. Hear Res. 175:200-214, 2003.
35. Mino H, Rubinstein JT, Miller CA, Abbas PJ. Effects of electrode-to-fiber distance on temporal neural response with electrical stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 51:13-20, 2004.
36. Nourski KV, Abbas PJ, Miller CA. Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function, 15th Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Contract N01-DC-2-1005, 2006.
37. Parkins CW, Colombo J. Auditory-nerve single-neuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes. Hear Res. 31:267-285, 1987.
38. Parkins CW. Temporal response patterns of auditory nerve fibers to electrical stimulation in deafened squirrel monkeys. Hear Res. 41:137-168, 1989.
39. Rebscher SJ, Snyder RL, Leake PA. The effect of electrode configuration and duration of deafness on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2035-2048, 2001.
40. Relkin EM, Doucet JR. Recovery from prior stimulation. I: Relationship to spontaneous firing rates of primary auditory neurons. Hear Res. 55:215-222, 1991.
41. Rubinstein JT, Wilson BS, Finley CC, Abbas PJ. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear Res. 127:108-118, 1999.
42. Smith RL. Short-term adaptation in single auditory nerve fibers: some poststimulatory effects. J. Neurophysiol. 40:1098-1111, 1977.
43. Smith RL, Brachman ML. Adaptation in auditory-nerve fibers: a revised model. Biol. Cybern. 44:107-120, 1982.
44. van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear Res. 14:225-243, 1984.
45. van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear Res. 29:195-206, 1987a.
46. van den Honert C, Stypulkowski PH. Temporal response patterns of single auditory nerve fibers elicited by periodic electrical stimuli. Hear Res. 29:207-222, 1987b.
47. Verveen AA. Fluctuation in Excitability. Drukkerij Holland N.V., Amsterdam, 1961.
48. Westerman LA, Smith RL. Rapid and short-term adaptation in auditory nerve responses. Hear Res. 15:249-260, 1984.
49. Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Zerbi M. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Eleventh Quarterly Progress Report. NIH Contract N01-DC-2-2401. Research Triangle Park, Research Triangle Institute, 1995.
50. Zhang X, Carney LH. Analysis of models for the synapse between the inner hair cell and the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118:1540-1553, 2005.