Genome-wide association study identified a narrow chromosome 1 region associated with chicken growth traits

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2012, Pages

  Xie, Liang ^a,d   Luo, Chenglong ^a,c   Zhang, Chengguang ^a   Zhang, Rong ^a   Tang, Jun ^a   Nie, Qinghua ^a   Ma, Li ^b   Hu, Xiaoxiang ^e   Li, Ning ^e   Da, Yang ^b   Zhang, Xiquan ^a  

^a Guangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c State Key Laboratory of Livestock and Poultry Breeding   (China)

^d Hainan Academy of Agricultural Sciences   (China)

^e CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENOMIC DNA; MESSENGER RNA; MICRORNA; MICRORNA 15A; MICRORNA 16 1; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALLELE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY GROWTH; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME IDENTIFICATION; CHROMOSOME MUTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FORKHEAD BOX O1A GENE; GENE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOTYPE; GROWTH RATE; INTEGRATOR COMPLEX SUBUNIT 6 GENE; KARYOPHERIN ALPHA 3 GENE; MALE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; MUSCLE MASS; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; WEIGHT GAIN; ANIMAL; BODY WEIGHT; CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME MAP; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CHROMOSOMES; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 84863164792     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030910     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Carlborg O, Kerje S, Schütz K, Jacobsson L, Jensen P, et al. (2003) A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken. Genome Research 13: 413.
2. Liu X, Zhang H, Li H, Li N, Zhang Y, et al. (2008) Fine-mapping quantitative trait loci for body weight and abdominal fat traits: effects of marker density and sample size. Poult Sci 87: 1314-1319.
3. Hu Z, Park C, Fritz E, Reecy J, (2010) QTLdb: a comprehensive database tool building bridges between genotypes and phenotypes. The 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. Leipzig, Germany August 1-6, 2010.
4. Ankra-Badu GA, Le Bihan-Duval E, Mignon-Grasteau S, Pitel F, Beaumont C, et al. (2010) Mapping QTL for growth and shank traits in chickens divergently selected for high or low body weight. Anim Genet 41: 400-405.
5. Sewalem A, Morrice DM, Law A, Windsor D, Haley CS, et al. (2002) Mapping of quantitative trait loci for body weight at three, six, and nine weeks of age in a broiler layer cross. Poult Sci 81: 1775-1781.
6. Kerje S, Carlborg O, Jacobsson L, Schutz K, Hartmann C, et al. (2003) The twofold difference in adult size between the red junglefowl and White Leghorn chickens is largely explained by a limited number of QTLs. Anim Genet 34: 264-274.
7. Lagarrigue S, Pitel F, Carre W, Abasht B, Le Roy P, et al. (2006) Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting fatness and breast muscle weight in meat-type chicken lines divergently selected on abdominal fatness. Genet Sel Evol 38: 85-97.
8. Atzmon G, Ronin YI, Korol A, Yonash N, Cheng H, et al. (2006) QTLs associated with growth traits and abdominal fat weight and their interactions with gender and hatch in commercial meat-type chickens. Anim Genet 37: 352-358.
9. Gao Y, Hu XX, Du Z, Deng XM, Huang YH, et al. (2006) A genome scan for quantitative trait loci associated with body weight at different developmental stages in chickens. Anim Genet 37: 276-278.
10. Gao Y, Du ZQ, Wei WH, Yu XJ, Deng XM, et al. (2009) Mapping quantitative trait loci regulating chicken body composition traits. Anim Genet 40 (6): 952-954.
11. Liu X, Li H, Wang S, Hu X, Gao Y, et al. (2007) Mapping quantitative trait loci affecting body weight and abdominal fat weight on chicken chromosome one. Poult Sci 86: 1084-1089.
12. Zhou H, Deeb N, Evock-Clover CM, Mitchell AD, Ashwell CM, et al. (2007) Genome-wide linkage analysis to identify chromosomal regions affecting phenotypic traits in the chicken. III. Skeletal integrity. Poult Sci 86: 255.
13. Rao Y, Shen X, Xia M, Luo C, Nie Q, et al. (2007) SNP mapping of QTL affecting growth and fatness on chicken GGA1. Genet Sel Evol 39: 569-582.
14. Ambo M, Moura AS, Ledur MC, Pinto LF, Baron EE, et al. (2009) Quantitative trait loci for performance traits in a broiler×layer cross. Anim Genet 40: 200-208.
15. Le Rouzic A, Alvarez-Castro JM, Carlborg O, (2008) Dissection of the genetic architecture of body weight in chicken reveals the impact of epistasis on domestication traits. Genetics 179: 1591-1599.
16. Wahlberg P, Carlborg O, Foglio M, Tordoir X, Syvanen AC, et al. (2009) Genetic analysis of an F(2) intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for body-weight. BMC Genomics 10: 248.
17. Uemoto Y, Sato S, Odawara S, Nokata H, Oyamada Y, et al. (2009) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting growth and carcass traits in F2 intercross chickens. Poult Sci 88: 477-482.
18. Goddard ME, Hayes BJ, (2009) Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat Rev Genet 10: 381-391.
19. Jiang L, Liu J, Sun D, Ma P, Ding X, et al. (2010) Genome wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein population. PLoS One 5: e13661.
20. Hirschhorn JN, Daly MJ, (2005) Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits. Nat Rev Genet 6: 95-108.
21. Kamei Y, Miura S, Suzuki M, Kai Y, Mizukami J, et al. (2004) Skeletal muscle FOXO1 (FKHR) transgenic mice have less skeletal muscle mass, down-regulated Type I (slow twitch/red muscle) fiber genes, and impaired glycemic control. J Biol Chem 279: 41114-41123.
22. Cho JE, Fournier M, Da X, Lewis MI, (2010) Time course expression of Foxo transcription factors in skeletal muscle following corticosteroid administration. J Appl Physiol 108: 137.
23. Kitamura T, Kitamura YI, Funahashi Y, Shawber CJ, Castrillon DH, et al. (2007) A Foxo/Notch pathway controls myogenic differentiation and fiber type specification. J Clin Invest 117: 2477-2485.
24. Leger B, Cartoni R, Praz M, Lamon S, Deriaz O, et al. (2006) Akt signalling through GSK-3b, mTOR and Foxo1 is involved in human skeletal muscle hypertrophy and atrophy. J Physiol 576: 923-933.
25. Southgate RJ, Neill B, Prelovsek O, El-Osta A, Kamei Y, et al. (2007) FOXO1 regulates the expression of 4E-BP1 and inhibits mTOR signaling in mammalian skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem 282: 21176-21186.
26. Yuan Y, Shi X, Liu Y, Yang G, (2011) FoxO1 regulates muscle fiber-type specification and inhibits calcineurin signaling during C2C12 myoblast differentiation. Mol Cell Biochem 348: 77-87.
27. Shmueli O, Horn-Saban S, Chalifa-Caspi V, Shmoish M, Renjamin-Rodrig H, et al. (2003) Genenote: whole genome expression profiles in normal human tisues. C R Biol 326: 1067-1072.
28. National Center for Biotechnology Information (2011) Entrez gene. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed 06 July 2011.
29. Bartel DP, (2009) MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136: 215-233.
30. Aqeilan RI, Calin GA, Croce CM, (2010) miR-15a and miR-16-1 in cancer: discovery, function and future perspectives. Cell Death Differ 17: 215-220.
31. Cimmino A, Calin GA, Fabbri M, Iorio MV, Ferracin M, et al. (2005) miR-15 and miR-16 induce apoptosis by targeting BCL2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 13944-13949.
32. Grimson A, Farh KK, Johnston WK, Garrett-Engele P, Lim LP, et al. (2007) MicroRNA targeting specificity in mammals: determinants beyond seed pairing. Mol Cell 27: 91-105.
33. Zavadil J, Ye H, Liu Z, Wu J, Lee P, et al. (2010) Profiling and functional analyses of microRNAs and their target gene products in human uterine leiomyomas. PloS ONE 5: e12362.
34. Kruger J, Rehmsmeier M, (2006) RNAhybrid: microRNA target prediction easy, fast and flexible. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W451-454.
35. Besnier F, Wahlberg P, Ronnegard L, Ek W, Andersson L, et al. (2011) Fine mapping and replication of QTL in outbred chicken advanced intercross lines. Genet Sel Evol 43: 33.
36. Gu X, Feng C, Ma L, Song C, Wang Y, et al. (2011) Genome-wide association study of body weight in chicken F2 resource population. PLoS ONE 6 (7): e21872 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021872.
37. Lei MM, Nie QH, Peng X, Zhang DX, Zhang XQ, (2005) Single nucleotide polymorphisms of the chicken insulin-like factor binding protein 2 gene associated with chicken growth and carcass traits. Poult Sci 84: 1191.
38. Marklund S, Carlborg O, (2010) SNP detection and prediction of variability between chicken lines using genome resequencing of DNA pools. BMC Genomics 11: 665.
39. Groenen M, Hillier L, Crooijmans R, Warren W, Muir W, et al. (2009) Design Of A 60 K Illumina Iselect™ Beadchip Covering All Chicken Chromosomes. Plant & Animal Genomes XVII Conference. Town & Country Convention Center, San Diego, CA, USA.
40. Ma L, Runesha HB, Dvorkin D, Garbe JR, Da Y, (2008) Parallel and serial computing tools for testing single-locus and epistatic SNP effects of quantitative traits in genome-wide association studies. BMC Bioinformatics 9: 315.
41. Mao Y, London NR, Ma L, Dvorkin D, Da Y, (2006) Detection of SNP epistasis effects of quantitative traits using an extended Kempthorne model. Physiol Genomics 28: 46-52.
42. Minitab Inc. (2011) Minitab® 16. Available: http://www.minitab.com. Accessed 30 June 2011.
43. Duggal P, Gillanders EM, Holmes TN, Bailey-Wilson JE, (2008) Establishing an adjusted p-value threshold to control the family-wide type 1 error in genome wide association studies. BMC Genomics 9: 516.
44. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ, (2005) Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics 21: 263-265.
45. Wang S, Dvorkin D, Da Y, (2011) SNPEVG: A graphical tool for SNP effect viewing and graphing. Available: http://animalgene.umn.edu. Accessed 30 June 2011.
46. IBM Research (2001) RNA22 microRNA target detection. Available: http://cbcsrv.watson.ibm.com/rna22.html. Accessed 18 May 2001.
47. Lewis BP, Burge CB, Bartel DP, (2005) Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. 120: 15-20.
48. Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (2011) TargetScan release 5.2. Available: http://www.targetscan.org. Accessed 30 June 2011.
49. Ensembl Genome Browser (2011) Ensembl release 63. Available: http://useast.ensembl.org/index.html. Accessed 30 June 2011.