Genetic analysis of an F2 intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for body-weight

BMC Genomics

Volumn 10, Issue , 2009, Pages

  Wahlberg, Per ^a   Carlborg, Örjan ^b   Foglio, Mario ^c   Tordoir, Xavier ^a,f   Syvänen, Ann Christine ^d   Lathrop, Mark ^c   Gut, Ivo G ^c   Siegel, Paul B ^e   Andersson, Leif ^a,b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^c DIF   (France)

^d UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BODY WEIGHT; BREEDING LINE; CHICKEN; CHROMOSOME 7; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOME ANALYSIS; GROWTH REGULATION; INBRED STRAIN; MALE; MICROCHROMOSOME; NONHUMAN; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME MAP; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC EPISTASIS; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHENOTYPE;

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

ANIMALS; BODY WEIGHT; CHICKENS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; CROSSES, GENETIC; EPISTASIS, GENETIC; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOTYPE; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI;

EID: 67649116325     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-248     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Dunnington EA Siegel PB Long-term divergent selection for eight-week body weight in white Plymouth rock chickens Poult Sci 1996, 75(10):1168-1179 8893291
2. Jacobsson L Park HB Wahlberg P Fredriksson R Perez-Enciso M Siegel PB Andersson L Many QTLs with minor additive effects are associated with a large difference in growth between two selection lines in chickens Genet Res 2005, 86(2):115-125 10.1017/S0016672305007767 16356285
3. Park HB Jacobsson L Wahlberg P Siegel PB Andersson L QTL analysis of body composition and metabolic traits in an intercross between chicken lines divergently selected for growth Physiol Genomics 2006, 25(2):216-223 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00113.2005 16390876
4. Carlborg O Jacobsson L Ahgren P Siegel P Andersson L Epistasis and the release of genetic variation during long-term selection Nat Genet 2006, 38(4):418-420 10.1038/ng1761 16532011
5. Wahlberg P Stromstedt L Tordoir X Foglio M Heath S Lechner D Hellstrom AR Tixier-Boichard M Lathrop M Gut IG et al A high-resolution linkage map for the Z chromosome in chicken reveals hot spots for recombination Cytogenet Genome Res 2007, 117(1-4):22-29 10.1159/000103161 17675841
6. Green P Falls K Crooks S Documentation for CRI-MAP, version 2.4 Washington School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 1990
7. Jacobsson L Park HB Wahlberg P Jiang S Siegel PB Andersson L Assignment of fourteen microsatellite markers to the chicken linkage map Poult Sci 2004, 83(11):1825-1831 15554057
8. Lander ES Botstein D Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps Genetics 1989, 121(1):185-199 1203601 2563713
9. Haley CS Knott SA A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers Heredity 1992, 69(4):315-324 16718932
10. Haley CS Knott SA Elsen JM Mapping quantitative trait loci in crosses between outbred lines using least squares Genetics 1994, 136(3):1195-1207 1205874 8005424
11. Seaton G Haley CS Knott SA Kearsey M Visscher PM QTL Express: Mapping quantitative trait loci in simple and complex pedigrees Bioinformatics 2002, 18(2):339-340 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.339 11847090
12. Carlborg O Kerje S Schutz K Jacobsson L Jensen P Andersson L A global search reveals epistatic interaction between QTL for early growth in the chicken Genome Res 2003, 13(3):413-421 430275 12618372 10.1101/gr.528003
13. Churchill GA Doerge RW Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping Genetics 1994, 138(3):963-971 1206241 7851788
14. Carlborg O Andersson L Use of randomization testing to detect multiple epistatic QTLs Genet Res 2002, 79(2):175-184 10.1017/S001667230200558X 12073555
15. Nei M Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Columbia University Press, New York 1987
16. Raymond M Rousset F GENEPOP Version 1.2: Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism J Hered 1995, 86(3):248-249
17. Paterson AH Damon S Hewitt JD Zamir D Rabinowitch HD Lincoln SE Lander ES Tanksley SD Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato: Comparison across species, generations, and environments Genetics 1991, 127(1):181-197 1204303 1673106
18. Groenen MA Cheng HH Bumstead N Benkel BF Briles WE Burke T Burt DW Crittenden LB Dodgson J Hillel J et al A consensus linkage map of the chicken genome Genome Res 2000, 10(1):137-147 310508 10645958
19. Groenen MA Wahlberg P Foglio M Cheng HH Megens HJ Crooijmans RP Besnier F Lathrop M Muir WM Wong GK et al A high-density SNP-based linkage map of the chicken genome reveals sequence features correlated with recombination rate Genome Res 2009, 19(3):510-519 10.1101/gr.086538.108 19088305
20. Carlborg Ö Andersson L Kinghorn B The use of a genetic algorithm for simultaneous mapping of multiple interacting quantitative trait loci Genetics 2000, 155(4):2003-2010 1461191 10924492
21. Le Rouzic A Siegel PB Carlborg Ö Phenotypic evolution from genetic polymorphisms in a radial network architecture BMC Biol 2007, 5:50 2194667 18001473 10.1186/1741-7007-5-50
22. Smith JM Haigh J The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene Genet Res 1974, 23(1):23-35 4407212
23. Keightley PD Hill WG Quantitative genetic variation in body size of mice from new mutations Genetics 1992, 131(3):693-700 1205040 1628812
24. International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium Sequence and comparative analysis of the chicken genome provide unique perspectives on vertebrate evolution Nature 2004, 432(7018):695-716 10.1038/ nature03154 15592404
25. Gordon L Yang S Tran-Gyamfi M Baggott D Christensen M Hamilton A Crooijmans R Groenen M Lucas S Ovcharenko I et al Comparative analysis of chicken chromosome 28 provides new clues to the evolutionary fragility of gene-rich vertebrate regions Genome Res 2007, 17(11):1603-1613 2045143 17921355 10.1101/gr.6775107