Diverse roles of Groucho/Tup1-like co-repressors in plant growth and development

Plant Signaling and Behavior

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 86-92

  Lee, Joanne E ^a   Golz, John F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84863033532     PISSN: 15592316     EISSN: 15592324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4161/psb.7.1.18377     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Payankaulam S, Li LM, Arnosti DN. Transcriptional repression: conserved and evolved features. Curr Biol 2010; 20:R764-71; PMID:20833321; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.06.037
2. Chen G, Courey AJ. Groucho/TLE family proteins and transcriptional repression. Gene 2000; 249:1-16; PMID:10831834; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1119(00)00161-X
3. Courey AJ, Jia S. Transcriptional repression: the long and the short of it. Genes Dev 2001; 15:2786-96; PMID:11691830
4. Smith RL, Johnson AD. Turning genes off by Ssn6- Tup1: a conserved system of transcriptional repression in eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 2000; 25:325-30; PMID:10871883; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0004(00)01592-9
5. DeRisi JL, Iyer VR, Brown PO. Exploring the metabolicand genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 1997; 278:680-6; PMID:9381177; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.278.5338.680
6. Green SR, Johnson AD. Promoter-dependent roles for the Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase and the Hda1 deacetylase in Tup1-mediated repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 2004; 15:4191-202; PMID:15240822; http://dx.doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E04-05-0412
7. Liu Z, Karmarkar V. Groucho/Tup1 family corepressors in plant development. Trends Plant Sci 2008; 13:137-44; PMID:18314376; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2007.12.005
8. Kieffer M, Stern Y, Cook H, Clerici E, Maulbetsch C,Laux T, et al. Analysis of the transcription factor WUSCHEL and its functional homologue in Antirrhinum reveals a potential mechanism for their roles in meristem maintenance. Plant Cell 2006; 18:560-73; PMID:16461579; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.039107
9. Sitaraman J, Bui M, Liu Z. LEUNIG_HOMOLOG and LEUNIG perform partially redundant functions during Arabidopsis embryo and floral development. Plant Physiol 2008; 147:672-81; PMID:18390806; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.115923
10. Liu Z, Meyerowitz EM. LEUNIG regulates AGAMOUS expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Development 1995; 121:975-91; PMID:7743940
11. Conner J, Liu Z. LEUNIG, a putative transcriptional corepressor that regulates AGAMOUS expression during flower development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:12902-7; PMID:11058164; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.230352397
12. Sridhar VV, Surendrarao A, Gonzalez D, Conlan RS, Liu Z. Transcriptional repression of target genes by LEUNIG and SEUSS, two interacting regulatory proteins for Arabidopsis flower development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:11494-9; PMID:15277686; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403055101
13. Sridhar VV, Surendrarao A, Liu Z. APETALA1 and SEPALLATA3 interact with SEUSS to mediate transcription repression during flower development. Development 2006; 133:3159-66; PMID:16854969; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.02498
14. Gregis V, Sessa A, Colombo L, Kater MM. AGL24, SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE, and APETALA1 redundantly control AGAMOUS during early stages of flower development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2006; 18:1373-82; PMID:16679456; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1105/tpc.106.041798
15. Gustafson-Brown C, Savidge B, Yanofsky MF. Regulation of the Arabidopsis floral homeotic gene APETALA1. Cell 1994; 76:131-43; PMID:7506995; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90178-3
16. Grigorova B, Mara C, Hollender C, Sijacic P, Chen X, Liu Z. LEUNIG and SEUSS co-repressors regulate miR172 expression in Arabidopsis flowers. Development 2011; 138:2451-6; PMID:21610026; http://dx.doi. org/10.1242/dev.058362
17. Wollmann H, Mica E, Todesco M, Long JA, Weigel D. On reconciling the interactions between APETALA2, miR172 and AGAMOUS with the ABC model of flower development. Development 2010; 137:3633-42; PMID: 20876650; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.036673
18. Yant L, Mathieu J, Dinh TT, Ott F, Lanz C, Wollmann H, et al. Orchestration of the floral transition and floral development in Arabidopsis by the bifunctional transcription factor APETALA2. Plant Cell 2010; 22:2156-70; PMID:20675573; http://dx. doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.075606
19. Gonzalez D, Bowen AJ, Carroll TS, Conlan RS. The transcription corepressor LEUNIG interacts with the histone deacetylase HDA19 and mediator components MED14 (SWP) and CDK8 (HEN3) to repress transcription. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:5306-15; PMID: 17526732; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.01912-06
20. Tian L, Chen ZJ. Blocking histone deacetylation in Arabidopsis induces pleiotropic effects on plant gene regulation and development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:200-5; PMID:11134508; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.011347998
21. Stahle MI, Kuehlich J, Staron L, von Arnim AG, Golz JF. YABBYs and the transcriptional corepressors LEUNIG and LEUNIG_HOMOLOG maintain leaf polarity and meristem activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2009; 21:3105-18; PMID:19837869; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.070458
22. Navarro C, Efremova N, Golz JF, Rubiera R, Kuckenberg M, Castillo R, et al. Molecular and genetic interactions between STYLOSA and GRAMINIFOLIA in the control of Antirrhinum vegetative and reproduc- tive development. Development 2004; 131:3649-59; PMID:15229173; http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dev.01205
23. Goldshmidt A, Alvarez JP, Bowman JL, Eshed Y. Signals derived from YABBY gene activities in organ primordia regulate growth and partitioning of Arabidopsis shoot apical meristems. Plant Cell 2008; 20:1217-30; PMID:18469164; http://dx.doi.org/10. 1105/tpc.107.057877
24. Huang J, DeBowles D, Esfandiari E, Dean G, Carpita NC, Haughn GW. The Arabidopsis transcription factor LUH/MUM1 is required for extrusion of seed coat mucilage. Plant Physiol 2011; 156:491-502; PMID: 21518777; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.172023
25. Walker M, Tehseen M, Doblin MS, Pettolino FA, Wilson SM, Bacic A, et al. The transcriptional regulator LEUNIG_HOMOLOG regulates mucilage release from the Arabidopsis testa. Plant Physiol 2011; 156:46-60; PMID:21402796; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.111. 172692
26. Usadel B, Kuschinsky AM, Rosso MG, Eckermann N, Pauly M. RHM2 is involved in mucilage pectin synthesis and is required for the development of the seed coat in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2004; 134:286-95; PMID: 14671019; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.034314
27. Western TL, Young DS, Dean GH, Tan WL, Samuels AL, Haughn GW. MUCILAGE-MODIFIED4 encodes a putative pectin biosynthetic enzyme developmentally regulated by APETALA2, TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1, and GLABRA2 in the Arabidopsis seed coat. Plant Physiol 2004; 134:296-306; PMID:14701918; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.103.035519
28. Western TL, Burn J, Tan WL, Skinner DJ, Martin- McCaffrey L, Moffatt BA, et al. Isolation and charac- terization of mutants defective in seed coat mucilage secretory cell development in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2001; 127:998-1011; PMID:11706181; http://dx.doi. org/10.1104/pp.010410
29. Dean GH, Zheng H, Tewari J, Huang J, Young DS, Hwang YT, et al. The Arabidopsis MUM2 gene encodes a b-galactosidase required for the production of seed coat mucilage with correct hydration properties. Plant Cell 2007; 19:4007-21; PMID:18165329; http://dx. doi.org/10.1105/tpc.107.050609
30. Macquet A, Ralet M-C, Loudet O, Kronenberger J, Mouille G, Marion-Poll A, et al. A naturally occurring mutation in an Arabidopsis accession affects a b-β- galactosidase that increases the hydrophilic potential of rhamnogalacturonan I in seed mucilage. Plant Cell 2007; 19:3990-4006; PMID:18165330; http://dx.doi. org/10.1105/tpc.107.050179
31. Long JA, Woody S, Poethig S, Meyerowitz EM, Barton MK. Transformation of shoots into roots in Arabidopsis embryos mutant at the TOPLESS locus. Development 2002; 129:2797-806; PMID:12050130
32. Long JA, Ohno C, Smith ZR, Meyerowitz EM. TOPLESS regulates apical embryonic fate in Arabidopsis. Science 2006; 312:1520-3; PMID: 16763149; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1123841
33. Zhu Z, Xu F, Zhang Y, Cheng YT, Wiermer M, Li X, et al. Arabidopsis resistance protein SNC1 activates immune responses through association with a transcriptional corepressor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010; 107:13960-5; PMID:20647385; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1002828107
34. Smith ZR, Long JA. Control of Arabidopsis apical-basal embryo polarity by antagonistic transcription factors. Nature 2010; 464:423-6; PMID:20190735; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08843
35. Friml J, Vieten A, Sauer M, Weijers D, Schwarz H, Hamann T, et al. Efflux-dependent auxin gradients establish the apical-basal axis of Arabidopsis. Nature 2003; 426:147-53; PMID:14614497; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature02085
36. Berleth T, Jürgens G. The role of the monopteros gene in organising the basal body region of the Arabidopsis embryo. Development 1993; 118:575-87.
37. Hardtke CS, Berleth T. The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. EMBO J 1998; 17:1405-11; PMID:9482737; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/emboj/17.5.1405
38. Ulmasov T, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ. Activation andrepression of transcription by auxin-response factors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:5844-9; PMID: 10318972; http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.10.5844
39. Hamann T, Benkova E, Bäurle I, Kientz M, Jürgens G. The Arabidopsis BODENLOS gene encodes an auxin response protein inhibiting MONOPTEROS-mediated embryo patterning. Genes Dev 2002; 16:1610-5; PMID: 12101120; http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/gad.229402
40. Weijers D, Benkova E, Jäger KE, Schlereth A, Hamann T, Kientz M, et al. Developmental specificity of auxin response by pairs of ARF and Aux/IAA transcriptional regulators. EMBO J 2005; 24:1874-85; PMID: 15889151; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.emboj.7600659
41. Gray WM, Kepinski S, Rouse D, Leyser O, Estelle M. Auxin regulates SCFTIR1-dependent degradation of AUX/IAA proteins. Nature 2001; 414:271-6; PMID: 11713520; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35104500
42. Weijers D, Schlereth A, Ehrismann JS, Schwank G, Kientz M, Jürgens G. Auxin triggers transient local signaling for cell specification in Arabidopsis embryo- genesis. Dev Cell 2006; 10:265-70; PMID:16459305; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2005.12.001
43. Szemenyei H, Hannon M, Long JA. TOPLESS mediates auxin-dependent transcriptional repression during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Science 2008; 319: 1384-6; PMID:18258861; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/ science.1151461
44. Aida M, Beis D, Heidstra R, Willemsen V, Blilou I, Galinha C, et al. The PLETHORA genes mediate patterning of the Arabidopsis root stem cell niche. Cell 2004; 119:109-20; PMID:15454085; http://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.018
45. Schlereth A, Möller B, Liu W, Kientz M, Flipse J, Rademacher EH, et al. MONOPTEROS controls embryonic root initiation by regulating a mobile transcription factor. Nature 2010; 464:913-6; PMID: 20220754; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08836
46. Tiwari SB, Hagen G, Guilfoyle TJ. Aux/IAA proteins contain a potent transcriptional repression domain. Plant Cell 2004; 16:533-43; PMID:14742873; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.017384
47. Kazan K, Manners JM. Jasmonate signaling: toward an integrated view. Plant Physiol 2008; 146:1459-68; PMID:18390489; http://dx.doi.org/10.1104/pp.107.115717
48. Browse J. Jasmonate passes muster: a receptor and targets for the defense hormone. Annu Rev Plant Biol 2009; 60:183-205; PMID:19025383; http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092007
49. Chini A, Fonseca S, Fernández G, Adie B, Chico JM, Lorenzo O, et al. The JAZ family of repressors is the missing link in jasmonate signalling. Nature 2007; 448:666-71; PMID:17637675; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature06006
50. Fernández-Calvo P, Chini A, Fernández-Barbero G, Chico J-M, Gimenez-Ibanez S, Geerinck J, et al. The Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factors MYC3 and MYC4 are targets of JAZ repressors and act additively with MYC2 in the activation of jasmonate responses. Plant Cell 2011; 23:701-15; PMID:21335373; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.110.080788
51. Niu Y, Figueroa P, Browse J. Characterization of JAZinteracting bHLH transcription factors that regulate jasmonate responses in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 2011;62:2143-54; PMID:21321051; http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq408
52. Thines B, Katsir L, Melotto M, Niu Y, Mandaokar A, Liu G, et al. JAZ repressor proteins are targets of the SCFCOI1 complex during jasmonate signalling. Nature 2007; 448:661-5; PMID:17637677; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature05960
53. Pauwels L, Barbero GF, Geerinck J, Tilleman S, Grunewald W, Perez AC, et al. NINJA connects the co-repressor TOPLESS to jasmonate signalling. Nature 2010; 464:788-91; PMID:20360743; http://dx.doi. org/10.1038/nature08854
54. Ohta M, Matsui K, Hiratsu K, Shinshi H, Ohme-Takagi M. Repression domains of class II ERF trans- criptional repressors share an essential motif for active repression. Plant Cell 2001; 13:1959-68; PMID: 11487705
55. Kagale S, Links MG, Rozwadowski K. Genome-wide analysis of ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated amphiphilic repression motif-containing transcriptional regulators in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 2010; 152:1109-34; PMID:20097792; http://dx.doi. org/10.1104/pp.109.151704
56. Schoof H, Lenhard M, Haecker A, Mayer KFX, Jürgens G, Laux T. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems is maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 2000; 100:635-44; PMID:10761929; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80700-X
57. Brand U, Fletcher JC, Hobe M, Meyerowitz EM, Simon R. Dependence of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis on a feedback loop regulated by CLV3 activity. Science 2000; 289:617-9; PMID:10915624; http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5479.617
58. Leibfried A, To JPC, Busch W, Stehling S, Kehle A, Demar M, et al. WUSCHEL controls meristem function by direct regulation of cytokinin-inducible response regulators. Nature 2005; 438:1172-5; PMID: 16372013; http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature04270
59. Busch W, Miotk A, Ariel FD, Zhao Z, Forner J, Daum G, et al. Transcriptional control of a plant stem cell niche. Dev Cell 2010; 18:841-853; PMID:20493816; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.03.012
60. Ikeda M, Mitsuda N, Ohme-Takagi M. Arabidopsis WUSCHEL is a bifunctional transcription factor that acts as a repressor in stem cell regulation and as an activator in floral patterning. Plant Cell 2009; 21:3493-505; PMID:19897670; http://dx.doi.org/10.1105/tpc.109.069997
61. Ahn J-W, Lee Y-A, Ahn J-H, Choi CY. Covalent conjugation of Groucho with SUMO-1 modulates itscorepressor activity. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2009; 379:160-5; PMID:19101520; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.12.043
62. Choi CY, Kim YH, Kim Y-O, Park SJ, Kim E-A, Riemenschneider W, et al. Phosphorylation by the DHIPK2 protein kinase modulates the corepressor activity of Groucho. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:21427-36; PMID:15802274; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M500496200
63. Kang W-H, Park Y-H, Park H-M. The LAMMER kinase homolog, Lkh1, regulates Tup transcriptional repressors through phosphorylation in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. J Biol Chem 2010; 285:13797-806; PMID: 20200159; http://dx.doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.113555
64. Nuthall HN, Joachim K, Stifani S. Phosphorylation of serine 239 of Groucho/TLE1 by protein kinase CK2 is important for inhibition of neuronal differentiation. MolCell Biol 2004; 24:8395-407; PMID:15367661; http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/MCB.24.19.8395-8407.2004