Randomly oriented edge arrangements dominate naturalistic arrangements in binocular rivalry

Vision Research

Volumn 64, Issue , 2012, Pages 49-55

  Hunt, Jonathan J ^a   Mattingley, Jason B ^a   Goodhill, Geoffrey J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Co circularity; Natural scene statistics; Saliency

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BINOCULAR VISION; ENTROPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; NATURALISTIC INQUIRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; VISION; VISUAL FIELD; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); DOMINANCE, OCULAR; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL CLOSURE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 84862993298     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: 18785646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Alais D., Blake R. Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research 1999, 39(26):4341-4353.
2. Alais D., Lorenceau J., Arrighi R., Cass J. Contour interactions between pairs of Gabors engaged in binocular rivalry reveal a map of the association field. Vision Research 2006, 46(8-9):1473-1487.
3. Arnold D., James B., Roseboom W. Binocular rivalry: Spreading dominance through complex images. Journal of Vision 2009, 9(13):1-9.
4. Baker D.H., Graf E.W. Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2009, 106(13):5436-5441.
5. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. The independent components of natural scenes are edge filters. Vision Research 1997, 37(23):3327-3338.
6. Ben-Shahar O. Visual saliency and texture segregation without feature gradient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2006, 103(42):15704-15709.
7. Bindemann M. Scene and screen center bias early eye movements in scene viewing. Vision Research 2010, 50(23):2577-2587.
8. Blake R. A primer on binocular rivalry, including current controversies. Brain and Mind 2001, 2:5-38.
9. Blake R., Westendorf D., Fox R. Temporal perturbations of binocular rivalry. Perception and Psychophysics 1990, 48(6):593-602.
10. Bonneh Y., Sagi D. Configuration saliency revealed in short duration binocular rivalry. Vision Research 1999, 39:271-281.
11. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 1997, 10(4):433-436.
12. Brascamp J.W., van Ee R., Noest A.J., Jacobs R.H.A.H., van den Berg A.V. The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise. Journal of Vision 2006, 6(11):1244-1256.
13. Bruce N., Tsotsos J. Saliency based on information maximization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2006, 18:155.
14. Cerf M., Harel J., Einhäuser W., Koch C. Predicting human gaze using low-level saliency combined with face detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 2008, 20:241-248.
15. Chong S., Tadin D., Blake R. Endogenous attention prolongs dominance durations in binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision 2005, 5(11):1004-1012.
16. Clifford C.W.G. Quick guide: Binocular rivalry. Current Biology 2009, 19(22):1022-1023.
17. Dong D.W., Atick J.J. Statistics of natural time-varying images. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 1995, 6:345-358.
18. Elder J.H., Goldberg R.M. Ecological statistics of Gestalt laws for the perceptual organization of contours. Journal of Vision 2002, 2(4):324-353.
19. Field D.J. Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 1987, 4(12):2379-2394.
20. Field D.J., Hayes A. Contour integration and the lateral connections of V1 neurons. The Visual, Neurosciences 2004, 1069-1079.
21. Geisler W.S. Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:167-192.
22. Geisler W., Perry J. Contour statistics in natural images: Grouping across occlusions. Visual neuroscience 2009, 26(01):109-121.
23. Geisler W.S., Perry J.S., Super B.J., Gallogly D.P. Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance. Vision Research 2001, 41(6):711-724.
24. Grossberg S., Pessoa L. Texture segregation, surface representation and figure-ground separation. Vision Research 1998, 38(17):2657-2684.
25. Hollins M. The effect of contrast on the completeness of binocular rivalry suppression. Perception and Psychophysics 1980, 27(6):550-556.
26. Hosoya T., Baccus S., Meister M. Dynamic predictive coding by the retina. Nature 2005, 436(7047):71-77.
27. Hunt, J. J. (2011). Natural scene statistics and the development of the primary visual cortex. Ph.D. thesis. University of QLD.
28. Hunt J.J., Bosking W.H., Goodhill G.J. Statistical structure of lateral connections in the primary visual cortex. Neural Systems and Circuits 2011, 1(1):3.
29. Hunt J.J., Giacomantonio C.E., Tang H., Mortimer D., Jaffer S., Vorobyov V., et al. Natural scene statistics and the structure of orientation maps in the visual cortex. Neuroimage 2009, 47(1):157-172.
30. Itti L., Baldi P. Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research 2009, 49(10):1295-1306.
31. Johnson M.H., Dziurawiec S., Ellis H., Morton J. Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline. Cognition 1991, 40(1-2):1-19.
32. Jones J.P., Palmer L.A. An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology 1987, 58(6):1233-1258.
33. Kang M.-s. Size matters: A study of binocular rivalry dynamics. Vision Research 2009, 9(1):1-11.
34. Kim Y.-J., Grabowecky M., Suzuki S. Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry. Vision research 2006, 46(3):392-406.
35. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D., Vecchi M.P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 1983, 220(4598):671-680.
36. Knapen T., van Ee R., Blake R. Stimulus motion propels traveling waves in binocular rivalry. PLoS One 2007, 2(1):e739.
37. Krips R., Furst M. Stochastic properties of coincidence-detector neural cells. Neural Computation 2009, 21(9):2524-2553.
38. Kruger N. Collinearity and parallelism are statistically significant second-order relations of complex cell responses. Neural Processing Letters 1998, 8:117-129.
39. -α scaling in natural image spectra. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 2000, 17(1):28-33.
40. Ledgeway T., Hess R.F., Geisler W.S. Grouping local orientation and direction signals to extract spatial contours: Empirical tests of association fieldmodels of contour integration. Vision Research 2005, 45:2511-2522.
41. Lehky S.R. Binocular rivalry is not chaotic. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B 1995, 259(1354):71-76.
42. Leonards U., Scott-Samuel N.E. Idiosyncratic initiation of saccadic face exploration in humans. Vision Research 2005, 45(20):2677-2684.
43. Lesica N.A., Jin J., Weng C., Yeh C.-I., Butts D.A., Stanley G.B., et al. Adaptation to stimulus contrast and correlations during natural visual stimulation. Neuron 2007, 55(3):479-491.
44. Lorigo L., Pan B., Hembrooke H., Joachims T., Granka L., Gay G. The influence of task and gender on search and evaluation behavior using Google. Information Processing and Management 2006, 42:1123-1131.
45. Motoyoshi I., Kingdom F.A.A. The role of co-circularity of local elements in texture perception Isamu Motoyoshi. Journal of Vision 2010, 10(3):1-8.
46. Najemnik J., Geisler W.S. Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search. Nature 2005, 434(7031):387-391.
47. Paffen C.L.E., Alais D., Verstraten F.A.J. Attention speeds binocular rivalry. Psychological Science 2006, 17:752.
48. Parkhurst D., Law K., Niebur E. Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research 2002, 42(1):107-123.
49. Polat U., Sagi D. Lateral interactions between spatial channels: suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments. Vision Research 1993, 33(7):993-999.
50. Reinagel P., Zador A.M. Natural scene statistics at the centre of gaze. Network 1999, 10(4):341-350.
51. Renninger L.W., Verghese P., Coughlan J. Where to look next? Eye movements reduce local uncertainty. Journal of Vision 2007, 7:1-17.
52. Ruderman D., Bialek W. Statistics of natural images: Scaling in the woods. Physical Review Letters 1994, 73(6):814-817.
53. Schultz W., Dickinson A. Neuronal coding of prediction errors. Annual Review of Neuroscience 2000, 23:473-500.
54. Schwartz O., Hsu A., Dayan P. Space and time in visual context. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2007, 8(7):522-535.
55. Sigman M., Cecchi G.A., Gilbert C.D., Magnasco M.O. On a common circle: Natural scenes and Gestalt rules. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2001, 98(4):1935-1940.
56. Simoncelli, E. P., & Freeman, W. T. (1995). The steerable pyramid: A flexible architecture for multi-scale derivative computation. In 2nd Annual international conference on image processing.
57. Tong F., Meng M., Blake R. Neural bases of binocular rivalry. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10(11):1364-6613.
58. Valois R.L.D., Albrecht D.G., Thorell L.G. Spatial frequency selectivity of cells in macaque visual cortex. Vision Research 1982, 22(5):545-559.
59. Van Hateren J.H., Van der Schaaf A. Independent component filters of natural images compared with simple cells in primary visual cortex. Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B 1998, 265(1394):359-366.
60. Walker P. Stochastic properties of binocular rivalry alternations. Perception 1975, 18(6):467-473.
61. Whittle P. Binocular rivalry and the contrast at contours. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1965, 17(3):217.
62. Williams D., Reingold E., Moscovitch M., Behrmann M. Patterns of eye movements during parallel and serial visual search tasks. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 1997, 51(2):151-164.
63. Wolfson S.S., Orientation T., Landy M.S. Discrimination of orientation-defined texture edges. Vision Research 1995, 35(20):2863-2877.
64. Zhang L., Tong M., Marks T., Shan H., Cottrell G. SUN: A Bayesian framework for saliency using natural statistics. Journal of Vision 2008, 8(7):1-20.
65. Zhaoping L. Theoretical understanding of the early visual processes by data compression and data selection. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 2006, 17(4):301-334.