Binocular rivalry: Spreading dominance through complex images

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1-9

  Arnold, Derek H ^a   James, Bridie ^a   Roseboom, Warrick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Binocular rivalry; Binocular vision; Visual awareness

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EYE DOMINANCE; HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE;

DOMINANCE, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; VISION, BINOCULAR;

EID: 77950360834     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.13.1     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alais, D., & Blake, R. (1999). Grouping visual features during binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 4341-4353.
2. Alais, D., & Melcher, D. (2007). Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity. Vision Research, 47, 269-279.
3. Arnold, D. H., Grove, P. M., & Wallis, T. S. A. (2007). Staying focussed: A functional account of perceptual suppression during binocular rivalry. Journal of Vision, 7(7):7, 1-8, http://journalofvision.org/7/7/7/, doi:10.1167/7.7.7.
4. Arnold, D. H., Law, P., & Wallis, T. S. A. (2008). Binocular switch suppression: A new method for persistently rendering the visible 'invisible'. Vision Research, 48, 994-1001.
5. Baker, D. H., & Graf, E. W. (2009). Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 5436-5441.
6. Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews, Neuroscience, 3, 13-23.
7. Blake, R., O'Shea, R. P., & Mueller, T. J. (1992). Spatial zones of binocular rivalry in central and peripheral vision. Visual Neuroscience, 8, 469-478.
8. Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223-231.
9. Changizi, M. A., & Shimojo, S. (2008). "X-ray vision" and the evolution of forward-facing eyes. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 254, 756-767.
10. Das, A., & Gilbert, C. D. (1995). Long-range horizontal connections and their role in cortical reorganization revealed by optical recording of cat primary visual cortex. Nature, 375, 780-784.
11. Dorrenhaus, W. (1975). Musterspezifischer visueller Wettstreit. Die Naturwissenschaften, 62, 578-579.
12. Fahle, M. (1982). Binocular Rivalry: Suppression depends on orientation and spatial frequency. Vision Research, 22, 787-800.
13. Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integrations by the human visual system: Evidence for a local 'association' field. Vision Research, 33, 173-193.
14. Haynes, J. D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eyespecific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 428, 496-499.
15. Horton, J. C., & Hoyt, W. F. (1991). The representation of the visual field in human striate cortex: A revision of the classic Holmes map. Archives of Ophthalmology, 109, 816-824.
16. Kang, M.-S., Heeger, D., & Blake, R. (2009). Periodic perturbations producing phase-locked fluctuations in visual perception. Journal of Vision, 9(2):8, 1-12, http://journalofvision.org/9/2/8/, doi:10.1167/9.2.8.
17. Kanizsa, G. (1979). In Organization in vision: Essays on gestalt perception. New York: Praeger.
18. Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 4302-4311.
19. Knapen, T., van Ee, R., & Blake, R. (2007). Stimulus motion propels traveling waves in binocular rivalry. PLoS One, 8, 1-7.
20. Lee, S. H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447-1454.
21. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. (2005). Travelling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 22-23.
22. Lee, S. H., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. (2007). Hierarchy of cortical responses underlying binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1048-1054.
23. Lee, T. S., & Nguyen, M. (2001). Dynamics of subjective contour formation in the early visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 1907-1911.
24. Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkey's percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549-553.
25. Levelt, W. J. M. (1968). On binocular rivalry. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
26. Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621-624.
27. Logothetis, N. K., & Schall, J. D. (1989). Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. Science, 245, 761-763.
28. Maruya, K., & Blake, R. (2009). Spatial spread of interocular suppression is guided by stimulus configuration. Perception, 38, 215-231.
29. Mendola, J. D., Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., Liu, A. K., & Tootell, R. B. (1999). The representation of illusory and real contours in human cortical visual areas revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Neuroscience, 19, 8560-8572.
30. Polonsky, A., Blake, R., & Heeger, D. J. (2000). Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 1153-1159.
31. Tong, F., & Engel, S. E. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195-199.
32. Watson, T. L., Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. (2004). Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670-1674.
33. Wilson, H. R., Blake, R., & Lee, S. H. (2001). Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception. Nature, 412, 907-910.
34. Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 1595-1602.