Equivalence and precision of knee cartilage morphometry between different segmentation teams, cartilage regions, and MR acquisitions

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 869-879

  Schneider, E ^a,b   Nevitt, M ^c   McCulloch, C ^c   Cicuttini, F M ^d,e   Duryea, J ^f   Eckstein, F ^g,h   Tamez Pena, J ^i,j,k  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b SciTrials LLC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^f BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^h Chondrometrics GmbH   (Germany)

ⁱ VirtualScopics LLC   (United States)

^j ESCUELA DE MEDICINA Y CIENCIAS DE LA SALUD   (Mexico)

^k Qmetrics Technologies   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Cartilage; Knee; Magnetic resonance; Morphometry; Osteoarthritis; Quantitation

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; KNEE; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIBIA;

ADULT; AGED; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PILOT PROJECTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIBIA;

EID: 84862985062     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: 15229653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.04.005     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Pleis J.R., Lethbridge-Cejku M. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey. Vital Health Stat 2005, 10(2006):1-153.
2. Felson D.T., Lawrence R.C., Hochberg M.C., McAlindon T., Dieppe P.A., Minor M.A., et al. Osteoarthritis: new insights. Part 2: treatment approaches. Ann Intern Med 2000, 133:726-737.
3. http://www.oai.ucsf.edu.
4. Peterfy C.G., Schneider E., Nevitt M. The osteoarthritis initiative: report on the design rationale for the magnetic resonance imaging protocol for the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008, 16:1433-1441.
5. Peterfy C.G., Gold G., Eckstein F., Cicuttini F., Dardzinski B., Stevens R. MRI protocols for whole-organ assessment of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, (14 Suppl A):A95-111.
6. Zhai G., Ding C., Cicuttini F., Jones G. Optimal sampling of MRI slices for the assessment of knee cartilage volume for cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2005, 6:10.
7. Eckstein F., Cicuttini F., Raynauld J.P., Waterton J.C., Peterfy C. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, (14 Suppl A):A46-A75.
8. Eckstein F., Mosher T., Hunter D. Imaging of knee osteoarthritis: data beyond the beauty. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2007, 19:435-443.
9. Eckstein F., Guermazi A., Roemer F.W. Quantitative MR imaging of cartilage and trabecular bone in osteoarthritis. Radiol Clin North Am 2009, 47:655-673.
10. Peterfy C., Woodworth T., Altman R. Workshop for consensus on osteoarthritis imaging: MRI of the knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14:44-45.
11. Eckstein F., Charles H.C., Buck R.J., Kraus V.B., Remmers A.E., Hudelmaier M., et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T. Arthritis Rheum 2005, 52:3132-3136.
12. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Berthiaume M.J., Beaudoin G., Choquette D., Haraoui B., et al. Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. Arthritis Res Ther 2006, 8. R21.
13. Disler D.G. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. Am J Roentgenol 1997, 169:1117-1123.
14. Hardy P.A., Recht M.P., Piraino D., Thomasson D. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996, 6:329-335.
15. Graichen H., von Eisenhart-Rothe R., Vogl T., Englmeier K.H., Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:811-816.
16. Eckstein F., Buck R.J., Burstein D., Charles H.C., Crim J., Hudelmaier M., et al. Precision of 3.0 Tesla quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage morphology in a multicentre clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2008, 67:1683-1688.
17. Tamez-Pena J., Barbu-McInnes M., Buck R.J., Totterman S. Cross validation of fused SPGR-GRE T2* MRI at 1.5T and 3.0T for morphological cartilage analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 12(Suppl 2):S1-S2.
18. Eckstein F., Kunz M., Schutzer M., Hudelmaier M., Jackson R.D., Yu J., et al. Two year longitudinal change and test-retest-precision of knee cartilage morphology in a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:1326-1332.
19. Eckstein F., Hudelmaier M., Wirth W., Kiefer B., Jackson R., Yu J., et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006, 65:433-441.
20. Brem M.H., Pauser J., Yoshioka H., Brenning A., Stratmann J., Hennig F.F., et al. Longitudinal in vivo reproducibility of cartilage volume and surface in osteoarthritis of the knee. Skeletal Radiol 2007, 36:315-320.
21. Duryea J., Neumann G., Brem M.H., Koh W., Noorbakhsh F., Jackson R.D., et al. Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007, 15:487-492.
22. Tamez-Pena J., Barbu-McInnes M., Jackson R., Yu J., Eaton C.B., Totterman S. Cartilage quantification: comparison between 3T DESS and 3T FLASH Sequences. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005, 13(Suppl A):S124.
23. Tamez-Pena J., Barbu-McInnes M., Jackson R., Yu J., Eaton C.B., Totterman S. Bone-Cartilage Contrast Ratio (BCCR) from MRI DESS sequence: signal-based quantitative biomarker in OA studies. Am College Rheumatol 2005, 92.
24. Eckstein F., Kunz M., Hudelmaier M., Jackson R., Yu J., Eaton C.B., et al. Impact of coil design on the contrast-to-noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative. Magn Reson Med 2007, 57:448-454.
25. Brem M.H., Lang P.K., Neumann G., Schlechtweg P.M., Schneider E., Jackson R., et al. Magnetic resonance image segmentation using semi-automated software for quantification of knee articular cartilage - initial evaluation of a technique for paired scans. Skeletal Radiol 2009, 38(5):505-511.
26. Altman R., Brandt K.D., Hochberg M.C., Moskowitz R. Design and conduct of clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the Osteoarthritis Research Society. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996, 4:217-243.
27. Glaser C., Burgkart R., Kutschera A., Englmeier K.H., Reiser M., Eckstein F. Femoro-tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: technique, test-retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med 2003, 50:1229-1236.
28. Eckstein F., Ateshian G., Burgkart R., Burstein D., Cicuttini F., Dardzinski B., et al. Proposal for a nomenclature for magnetic resonance imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14:974-983.
29. Hudelmaier M., Wirth W., Wehr B., Kraus V., Wyman B.T., Hellio Le Graverand M.P., et al. Femorotibial cartilage morphology: reproducibility of different metrics and femoral regions, and sensitivity to change in disease. Cells Tissues Organs 2010, 192(5):340-350.
30. Buckland-Wright C. Review of the anatomical and radiological differences between fluoroscopic and non-fluoroscopic positioning of osteoarthritic knees. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006, 14(Suppl A):A19-A31.
31. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Abram F., Dorais M., Haraoui B., Choquette D., et al. Analysis of the precision and sensitivity to change of different approaches to assess cartilage loss by quantitative MRI in a longitudinal multicentre clinical trial in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Res Ther 2008, 10. R129.
32. Raynauld J.P. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 2003, 15:647-650.
33. Wirth W., Larroque S., Davies R.Y., Nevitt M., Gimona A., Baribaud F., et al. Comparison of 1-year versus 2-year change in regional cartilage thickness in osteoarthritis results from 346 participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011, 19:74-83.
34. Wirth W., Nevitt M., Hellio Le Graverand M.P., Benichou O., Dreher D., Davies R.Y., et al. Sensitivity to change of cartilage morphometry using coronal FLASH, sagittal DESS, and coronal MPR DESS protocols-comparative data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2010, 18:547-554.
35. Eckstein F., Heudorfer L., Faber S.C., Burgkart R., Englmeier K.H., Reiser M. Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002, 10:922-928.
36. Kiel D.P., Mercier C.A., Dawson-Hughes B., Cali C., Hannan M.T., Anderson J.J. The effects of analytic software and scan analysis technique on the comparison of dual X-ray absorptiometry with dual photon absorptiometry of the hip in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 1995, 10(7):1130-1136.
37. Wirth W., Hellio Le Graverand M.P., Wyman B.T., Maschek S., Hudelmaier M., Hitzl W., et al. Regional analysis of femorotibial cartilage loss in a subsample from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009, 17:291-297.
38. Hunter D.J., Niu J., Zhang Y., Totterman S., Tamez J., Dabrowski C., et al. Change in cartilage morphometry: a sample of the progression cohort of the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:349-356.
39. Cicuttini F.M., Baker J., Hart D.J., Spector T.D. Association of pain with radiological changes in different compartments and views of the knee joint. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1996, 4:143-147.
40. Cicuttini F.M., Wluka A.E., Wang Y., Davis S.R., Hankin J., Ebeling P. Compartment differences in knee cartilage volume in healthy adults. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:554-556.
41. Cicuttini F.M., Wluka A.E., Wang Y., Stuckey S.L. Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50:94-97.
42. Cicuttini F., Wluka A., Hankin J., Wang Y. Longitudinal Study of the Relationship between Knee Angle and Tibiofemoral Cartilage Volume in Subjects with Knee Osteoarthritis 2004, Rheumatology, Oxford.
43. Eckstein F., Schnier M., Haubner M., Priebsch J., Glaser C., Englmeier K.H., et al. Accuracy of cartilage volume and thickness measurements with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop 1998, 137-148.
44. Cicuttini F.M., Wluka A.E., Stuckey S.L. Tibial and femoral cartilage changes in knee osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2001, 60:977-980.
45. Eckstein F., Maschek S., Wirth W., Hudelmaier M., Hitzl W., Wyman B., et al. One year change of knee cartilage morphology in the first release of participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative progression subcohort: association with sex, body mass index, symptoms and radiographic osteoarthritis status. Ann Rheum Dis 2009, 68:674-679.
46. Eckstein F., Benichou O., Wirth W., Nelson D.R., Maschek S., Hudelmaier M., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based cartilage loss in painful contralateral knees with and without radiographic joint space narrowing: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2009, 61:1218-1225.
47. Eckstein F., Lemberger B., Gratzke C., Hudelmaier M., Glaser C., Englmeier K.H., et al. In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64(2):291-295.
48. Pelletier J.P., Raynauld J.P., Berthiaume M.J., Abram F., Choquette D., Haraoui B., et al. Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study. Arthritis Res Ther 2007, 9. R74.
49. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Berthiaume M.J., Labonté F., Beaudoin G., de Guise J.A., et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of knee osteoarthritis progression over two years and correlation with clinical symptoms and radiologic changes. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 50(2):476-487.
50. Eckstein F., Wirth W. Quantitative cartilage imaging in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis 2011, 1:1-19.
51. Lassere M.N. Longitudinal and observational studies module. J Rheumatol 1999, 26(2):459-468.
52. Bruynesteyn K., Boers M., Kostense P., van der Linden S., van der Heijde Deciding on progression of joint damage in paired films of individual patients: smallest detectable difference or change. Ann Rheum Dis 2005, 64:179-182.