Influence of the perception of biological or non-biological motion on movement execution

Journal of Sports Sciences

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 519-530

  Bouquet, C A ^a   Gaurier, V ^a   Shipley, T ^b   Toussaint, L ^a   Blandin, Y ^a  

^a MSHS   (France)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMITATION; LEARNING STYLE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); OBSERVATION; PHYSIOLOGY; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARM; HUMANS; IMITATIVE BEHAVIOR; MOTION PERCEPTION; MOVEMENT; OBSERVATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS;

EID: 34249667041     PISSN: 02640414     EISSN: 1466447X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02640410600946803     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Blakemore, S. J. and Frith, C. (2005) The role of motor contagion in the prediction of action. Neuropsychologia, 43, pp. 260-267.
2. Breslin, G., Hodges, N. J., Williams, A. M., Curran, W. and Kremer, J. (2005) Modelling relative motion to facilitate intra-limb coordination. Human Movement Science, 24, pp. 446-463.
3. Casile, A. and Giese, M. A. (2006) Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology, 16, pp. 69-74.
4. Decety, J. and Grèzes, J. (1999) Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 5, pp. 172-178.
5. Dittrich, W. H. (1993) Action categories and the perception of biological motion. Perception, 22, pp. 15-22.
6. Pellegrino, G. Di, Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. (1992) Understanding motor events: A neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91, pp. 176-180.
7. Fadiga, L. and Craighero, L. (2003) New insights on sensorimotor integration: From hand action to speech perception. Brain and Cognition, 53, pp. 514-524.
8. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Pavesi, G. and Rizzolatti, G. (1995) Motor facilitation during action observation: A magnetic stimulation study. Journal of Neurophysiology, 73, pp. 2608-2611.
9. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Rizzolatti, G. (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119, pp. 593-609.
10. Grèzes, J. and Decety, J. (2002) Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia, 40, pp. 212-222.
11. Grèzes, J., Fonlupt, P., Bertenthal, B., Delon-Martin, C., Segebarth, C. and Decety, J. (2001) Does perception of biological motion rely on specific brain regions?. NeuroImage, 13, pp. 775-785.
12. Grossman, E. D. and Blake, R. (2002) Brain areas active during visual perception of biological motion. Neuron, 35, pp. 1167-1175.
13. Grossman, E., Blake, R. and Kim, C. -Y. (2004) Learning to see biological motion: Brain activity parallels behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, pp. 1669-1679.
14. Grossman, E. D., Donnelly, M., Price, P., Morgan, V., Pickens, D. and Neighbor, G. (2000) Brain areas involved in perception of biological motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, pp. 711-720.
15. Hecht, H., Vogt, S. and Prinz, W. (2001) Motor learning enhances perceptual judgement: A case for action - perception transfer. Psychological Research, 65, pp. 3-14.
16. Hill, H. and Johnston, A. (2001) Categorizing sex and identity from the biological motion of faces. Current Biology, 11, pp. 880-885.
17. Hodges, N. J., Hayes, S. J., Breslin, G. and Williams, A. M. (2005) An evaluation of the minimal constraining information during observation for movement reproduction. Acta Psychologica, 119, pp. 264-282.
18. Horn, R., Williams, A. M. and Scott, M. A. (2002) Learning from demonstration: The role of visual search from video and point-light displays. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, pp. 253-269.
19. Howell, D. C. (2002) Statistical methods for psychology, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA
20. Jeannerod, M. (2001) Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, pp. S103-S109.
21. Johansson, G. (1973) Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, pp. 201-211.
22. Johansson, G. (1976) Spatio-temporal differentiation and integration in visual motion perception: An experimental and theoretical analysis of calculus-like functions in visual data processing. Psychological Research, 38, pp. 379-393.
23. Kilner, J. M., Paulignan, Y. and Blakemore, S. J. (2003) An interference effect of observed biological movement on action. Current Biology, 13, pp. 522-525.
24. Kozlowski, L. T. and Cutting, J. E. (1977) Recognizing the sex of a walker from a dynamic point-light display. Perception and Psychophysics, 21, pp. 575-580.
25. Lacquanti, F., Terzuolo, C. A. and Viviani, P. (1983) The law relating kinematic and figural aspects of drawing movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, pp. 115-130.
26. Maeda, F., Kleiner-Fisman, G. and Pascual-Leone, A. (2002) Motor facilitation while observing hand actions: Specificity of the effect and role of observers' orientation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, pp. 1329-1335.
27. Mataric, M. and Pomplun, M. (1998) Fixation behavior in observation and imitation of human movement. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, pp. 191-202.
28. Mather, G. and Murdoch, L. (1994) Gender discrimination in biological motion displays based on dynamic cues. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 258, pp. 273-279.
29. McLeod, P., Dittrich, W., Driver, J., Perret, D. and Zihl, J. (1996) Preserved and impaired detection of structure from motion by a "motion-blind" patient. Visual Cognition, 3, pp. 363-391.
30. Oram, M. W. and Perrett, D. I. (1994) Responses of anterior superior temporal polysensory (STPa) neurons to biological motion stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6, pp. 99-116.
31. Orliaguet, J. P., Kandel, S. and Boë, L. J. (1997) Visual perception of cursive handwriting: Influence of spatial and kinematic information on the anticipation of forthcoming letters. Perception, 26, pp. 905-912.
32. Pavlova, M., Krageloh-Mann, I., Sokolov, A. and Birbaumer, N. (2001) Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception, 30, pp. 925-933.
33. Pelphrey, K. A., Mitchell, T. V., McKeown, M. J., Goldstein, J., Allison, T. and McCarthy, G. (2003) Brain activity evoked by the perception of human walking: Controlling for meaningful coherent motion. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, pp. 6819-6825.
34. Pinto, J. and Shiffrar, M. (1999) Subconfigurations of the human form in the perception of biological motion displays. Acta Psychologica, 102, pp. 293-318.
35. Reed, C. L. and Farah, M. J. (1995) The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, pp. 334-343.
36. Runeson, S. (1994) Perception of biological motion: The KSD-principle and the implications of a distal versus proximal approach. Perceiving events and objects, pp. 383-405. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
37. Shiffrar, M. and Freyd, J. J. (1990) Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science, 1, pp. 257-264.
38. Shipley, T. F. (2003) The effect of object and event orientation on perception of biological motion. Psychological Science, 14, pp. 377-380.
39. Smeets, J. B. J. and Brenner, E. (2004) Curved movements paths and the Hering illusion: Positions or directions?. Visual Cognition, 11, pp. 255-274.
40. Troje, N. F. (2002) Decomposing biological motion: A framework for analysis and synthesis of human gait patterns. Perception, 32, pp. 201-210.
41. Vaina, L. M., Lemay, M., Bienfang, D. C., Choi, A. Y. and Nakayama, K. (1990) Intact biological motion and structure from motion perception in a patient with impaired motion mechanisms: A case study. Visual Neuroscience, 5, pp. 353-369.
42. Viviani, P. and Stucchi, N. (1992) Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor - perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, pp. 603-623.
43. Welsh, T. N., Elliott, D. and Weeks, D. J. (1999) Hand deviations toward distractors: Evidence for response competition. Experimental Brain Research, 127, pp. 207-212.
44. Wohlschläger, A. and Bekkering, H. (2002) Is human imitation based on a mirror-neurone system? Some behavioural evidence. Experimental Brain Research, 143, pp. 335-341.
45. Wohlschläger, A., Gattis, M. and Bekkering, H. (2003) Action generation and action perception in imitation: An instance of the ideomotor principle. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 358, pp. 501-515.