Modeling the temporal dynamics of social rating networks using bidirectional effects of social relations and rating patterns

Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 527-536

  Jamali, Mohsen ^a   Haffari, Gholamreza ^a   Ester, Martin ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Generative models; Social rating networks; Temporal dynamics; User behavioral modeling

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL MODELING; BIDIRECTIONAL EFFECTS; COMMUNITY STRUCTURES; DATA SETS; EVALUATION CRITERIA; EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES; GENERATIVE MODEL; NETWORK EVOLUTION; RATING PATTERN; REAL LIFE DATASETS; REAL WORLD DATA; SOCIAL NETWORKS; SOCIAL RATINGS; SOCIAL RELATIONS; SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS; TEMPORAL BEHAVIOR; TEMPORAL DYNAMICS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; RATING; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); WORLD WIDE WEB;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

EID: 84862973537     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1963405.1963480     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. A. Anagnostopoulos, R. Kumar, and M. Mahdian. Influence and correlatino in social networks. In KDD 2008.
2. M. Cha, A. Mislove, and K. P. Gummadi. A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual World Wide Web Conference (WWW'09), Madrid, Spain, April 2009.
3. D. Crandall, D. Cosley, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and S. Suri. Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In KDD 2008.
4. N. E. Friedkin. A Structural Theory of Social Influence. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
5. D. Goldberg, D. Nichols, B. M. Oki, and D. Terry. Using collaborative filtering to weave an information tapestry. Communications of the ACM, 35(12), 1992.
6. P. Holland and S. Leinhardt. Some evidence on the transitivity of positive interpersonal sentiment. American Journal of Sociology, pages 1205-1209, 1972.
7. P. Holme and M. Newman. Nonequilibrium phase transition in the coevolution of networks and opinions. Physical Review E, 74:056108, 2006.
8. D. R. Hunter, S. M. Goodreau, and M. S. Handcock. Goodness of fit of social network models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(481), 2008.
9. R. Kumar, J. Novak, and A. Tomkins. Structure and evolution of online social networks. In KDD 2006.
10. J. Leskovec, L. Backstrom, R. Kumar, and A. Tomkins. Microscopic evolution of social networks. In KDD 2008.
11. Y. Matsuo and H. Yamamoto. Community gravity: measuring bidirectional effects by trust and rating on online social networks. In WWW 2009.
12. M. Mcpherson, L. S. Lovin, and J. M. Cook. Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1):415-444, 2001.
13. A. Mislove, M. Marcon, K. P. Gummadi, P. Druschel, and B. Bhattacharjee. Measurement and analysis of online social networks. In IMC '07: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGCOMM conference on Internet measurement, 2007.
14. M. Newman. Power laws, pareto distributions and zipfŠs law. Contemporary Physics, 46(5):323-351, 2005.
15. M. Newman, A.-L. Barabási, and D. J. Watts. The Structure and Dynamics of Networks. Princeton University Press, 2006.
16. P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. Grouplens: an open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In CSCW '94: ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1994.
17. M. Richardson and P. Domingos. Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing. In KDD 2002.
18. E. Zheleva, H. Sharara, and L. Getoor. Co-evolution of social and affiliation networks. In KDD 2009.