Patent classification using ontology-based patent network analysis

PACIS 2010 - 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 962-972

  Shih, Meng Jung ^a   Liu, Duen Ren ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

K nearest neighbor; Patent classification; Patent network analysis; Patent ontology network

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION METHODS; COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE; CONVENTIONAL APPROACH; CONVENTIONAL METHODS; DATA SETS; INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS; K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR CLASSIFIER; K-NEAREST NEIGHBORS; NETWORK-BASED; NETWORK-BASED APPROACH; ONTOLOGY-BASED; PATENT CLASSIFICATIONS; PATENT DOCUMENTS; PATENT MANAGEMENT; PATENT NETWORK; UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE;

COMPETITION; DATA PROCESSING; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; METADATA; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; STATISTICAL TESTS;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84862938048     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Cong, H. and Tong, L. H. (2008). Grouping of TRIZ Inventive Principles to facilitate automatic patent classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 788-795.
2. Cong, H. and Loh, H. T. (2010). Pattern-Oriented Associative Rule-Based Patent Classification. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(3), 2395-2404.
3. Fall, C. J., Torcsvari, A., Benzineb, K. and Karetka, G. (2003). Automated categorization in the International Patent Classification. In SIGIR Forum, 10-25.
4. Fall, C. J., Torcsvari, A., Benzineb, K. and Karetka, G. (2004). Automated categorization of Germanlanguage Patent Documents. Expert Systems with Applications, 26(2), 269-277.
5. O'Hara, K., Alani, H. and Shadbolt, N. (2002). Identifying Communities of Practice: Analysing Ontologies as Network to Support Community Recognition. In Proceeding Conference International Federation Information Processing, World Computer Congress.
6. Kim, J. H. and Choi, K. S. (2007). Patent document categorization based on semantic structural information. Information Processing and management, 43, 1200-1215.
7. Kohonen, T., Kaski, S., Lagus, K., Salojavi, J., Honkela, J., Paatetro, V., et al. (2000). Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 11(3), 574-585.
8. Lai, K. K., Wu, S. J. (2005). Using the Patent Co-citation Approach to Establish a New Patent Classification System. Information Processing and Management, 41, 313-330.
9. Larkey, L. S. (1999). A Patent Search and classification system. In Proceedings of the fourth ACM conference on Digital libraries, 179-183.
10. th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital libraries, 419-427.
11. Loh, H. T., He, C. and Shen, L. (2006). Automatic classification of patent documents for TRIZ users. World Patent Information, 28(1), 6-13.
12. Richter, G. and MacFarlane, A. (2005). The Impact of metadata on the accuracy of automated patent classification. World patent Information, 27(1), 13-26.
13. Salton, G. and Buckley, C. (1988). Term-Weighting Approaches in Automatic Text Retrieval. Information Process Management, 24(4), 323-328.
14. Trappey, A.J.C., Hsu, F. C., Trappey, C. V., Lin, C-I. (2006). Development of a patent document classification and search platform using a back-propagation network. Expert Systems with Applications, 31, 755-765.
15. Van Rijsbergen, C. J. (1979). Information retrieval (2nd ed.). London: Butterworths.
16. Yang, Y. (1994). Expert Network: Effective and Efficient Learning from Human Decisions in Text Categorisation and Retrieval. In: Croft WB, van Rijsbergen CJ, editors. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin, 3-6 July. New York: ACM, 13-22.