Automated categorization of German-language patent documents

Expert Systems with Applications

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 269-277

  Fall, C J ^a   Torcsvari A ^b   Fievet P ^c   Karetka, G ^c  

^a E doc Division   (Switzerland)

^b Arcanum Development   (Hungary)

^c WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Categorization; Hierarchical taxonomy; Intellectual Property; International Patent Classification; Patent

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); LEARNING ALGORITHMS; LINGUISTICS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

AUTOMATED CATEGORIZATION; TAXONOMY;

EXPERT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0347534201     PISSN: 09574174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00141-6     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Adams S. Using the international patent classification in an online environment. World Patent Information. 22:2000;291-300.
2. Calvert J., Makarov M. The reform of the ipc. World Patent Information. 23:2001;133-136.
3. Chakrabarti S., Dom B., Agrawal R., Raghavan P. Jarke M., Carey M.J., Dittrich K.R., Lochovsky F.H., Loucopoulos P., Jeusfeld M.A. Using taxonomy, discriminants, and signatures for navigating in text databases. VLDB'97, Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, August 25-29. 1997;446-455 Morgan Kaufmann, Athens, Greece.
4. Chakrabarti S., Dom B., Agrawal R., Raghavan P. Scalable feature selection, classification and signature generation for organizing large text databases into hierarchical topic taxonomies. VLDB Journal. 7:1998;163-178.
5. Chakrabarti S., Dom B.E., Indyk P. Haas L.M., Tiwary A. Enhanced hypertext categorization using hyperlinks. Proceedings of SIGMOD-98, ACM International Conference on Management of Data. 1998;307-318 ACM Press, New York, US.
6. Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (Eds.) (1999). Internationale Patentklassifikation (7th ed.) (Vol. 1-9). Köln: Carl Heymanns KG.
7. Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt. Stich- und Schlagwörterverzeichnis zur IPC-Internationale Patentklassifikation. 7th ed: 1999;Carl Heymanns KG, Köln.
8. Fall, C. J., Törcsvári, A., Benzineb, K., Karetka, G (2003). Automated categorization in the international patent classification. ACM SI IR Forum 37.
9. Gey F.C., Buckland M., Chen C., Larson R. Entry vocabulary - a technology to enhance digital search. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Human Language Technology. 2001;. (pp. 91-95).
10. Hull D., At-Mokhtar S., Chuat M., Eisele A., Gaussier E., Grefenstette G., Isabelle P., Samuelsson C., Segond F. Language technologies and patent search and classification. World Patent Information. 23:2001;265-268.
11. Kohonen T., Kaski S., Lagus K., Salojärvi J., Honkela J., Paatero V., Saarela A. Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. 11:2000;574-585.
12. Koster C.H.A., Seutter M. Taming wild phrases. Proceedings of ECIT03 Conference. 2003.
13. Koster C.H.A., Seutter M., Beney J. Classifying patent applications with winnow. Proceedings of Benelearn 2001 Conference. 2001.
14. Krier M., Zaccà F. Automatic categorization applications at the European patent office. World Patent Information. 24:2002;187-196.
15. Larkey, L. S (1998). Some issues in the automatic classification of US patents. AAAi-98 working notes.
16. Larkey L.S. Fox E.A., Rowe N. A patent search and classification system. Proceedings of DL-99, Fourth ACM Conference on Digital Libraries. 1999;179-187 ACM Press, New York, US.
17. Lewis D.D., Yang Y., Rose T.F.L. RCV1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research. 2003;. (in press).
18. Lezius, W., Rapp, R., Wettler, M (1998). A freely available morphological analyzer, disambiguator and context sensitive lemmatizer for german. In COLING-ACL (pp. 743-748).
19. McCallum, A. K (1996). Bow: A toolkit for statistical language modeling, text retrieval, classification and clustering. www.cs.cmu.edu/̃mccallum/bow.
20. Oppenheimer C., Jones M.C., Carpenter A.M. Consistency of use of the international patent classification. International Classification. 5:1978;30-32.
21. Paige C.C., Saunders M.A. Algorithm 583: Lsqr: Sparse linear equations and least squares problems. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software. 8:1982;195-209.
22. Schewe, S (1997). Automatische kategorizierung von volltexten unter anwendung von nlp-techniken. Master's thesis. Diplomarbeit am Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Dortmund.
23. Sebastiani F. Machine learning in automated text categorization. ACM Computing Surveys. 34:2002;1-47.
24. Smith H. Automation of patent classification. World Patent Information. 24:2002;269-271.
25. Teichert T., Mittermayer M.-A. Text mining for technology monitoring. Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, IEMC-2002. 2002;. (pp. 596-601).
26. Vachon T., Grandjean N., Parisot P. Interactive exploration of patent data for competitive intelligence: Applications in ulix (novartis knowledge miner). Proceedings of the International Chemical Information Conference. 2001.
27. WIPO (1999). Guide, Survey of Classes and Summary of Main Groups (7th ed.) (Vol. 9). Geneva: World Intellectual Property Organization.
28. Zakaria, S (1989). Automated patent classification for german patent documents. PhD thesis. University of Saarland, Germany.