Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing the effectiveness of on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 125, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 338-344

  Chen, Yong Bing ^a   Shu, Jian ^a   Yang, Wen Tao ^a   Shi, Li ^a   Guo, Xu Feng ^a   Wang, Fei Ge ^a   Qian, Yong Yue ^a  

^a SOOCHOW UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Atrial fibrillation; Coronary artery bypass grafting; Myocardial infarction; Off pump; Randomized clinical trials; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; META ANALYSIS; OFF PUMP CORONARY SURGERY; ON PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT SAFETY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK REDUCTION; STROKE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS, OFF-PUMP; FEMALE; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862926195     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2012.02.032     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. SoS Investigators. Coronary artery bypass surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (the Stent or Surgery trial): A randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 965-970.
2. Stover EP, Siegel LC, Parks R, Levin J, Body SC, Maddi R, et al. Variability in transfusion practice for coronary artery bypass surgery persists despite national consensus guidelines: A 24-institution study. Anesthesiology 1998; 88: 327-333.
3. Stamou SC, Hill PC, Dangas G, Pfister AJ, Boyce SW, Dullum MK, et al. Stroke after coronary artery bypass: Incidence, predictors, and clinical outcome. Stroke 2001; 32: 1508-1513.
4. Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, Friedman AS, Koch C, Mangano DT, et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. JAMA 1996; 276: 300-306.
5. Rose EA. Off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 379-380.
6. Ascione R, Caputo M, Angelini GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: not a flash in the pan. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 306-313.
7. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6, the Cochrane Library. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2006.
8. Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Stat Med 2004; 23: 1351-1375.
9. Friedrich JO, Adhikari NK, Beyene J. Inclusion of zero total event trials in meta-analyses maintains analytic consistency and incorporates all available data. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007; 7: 5.
10. Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Eng J Med 2009; 361: 1827-1837.
11. Al-Ruzzeh S, George S, Bustami M, Wray J, Ilsley C, Athanasiou T, et al. Effect of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery on clinical, angiographic, neurocognitive, and quality of life outcomes: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2006; 332: 1365-1372.
12. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC, Ascione R. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2002; 359: 1194-1199.
13. Raja SG, Haider Z, Ahmad M. Predictors of gastrointestinal complications after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery. Surgeon 2003; 1: 221-228.
14. Czerny M, Baumer H, Kilo J, Zuckermann A, Grubhofer G, Chevtchik O, et al. Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2001; 71: 165-169.
15. Khan NE, De Souza A, Mister R, Flather M, Clague J, Davies S, et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2004; 350: 21-28.
16. Kobayashi J, Tashiro T, Ochi M, Yaku H, Watanabe G, Satoh T, et al. Early outcome of a randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multiple arterial coronary revascularization. Circulation 2005; 112: I338-I343.
17. Legare JF, Buth KJ, King S, Wood J, Sullivan JA, Hancock Friesen C, et al. Coronary bypass surgery performed off pump does not result in lower in-hospital morbidity than coronary artery bypass grafting performed on pump. Circulation 2004; 109: 887-892.
18. Lingaas PS, Hol PK, Lunblad R, Rein KA, Tonnesen TI, Svennevig JL, et al. Clinical and angiographic outcome of coronary surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: aprospective randomized trial. Heart Surg Forum 2004; 7: 37-41.
19. Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A, Manfredi J, Metra M, Nodari S, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery technique for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 778-783.
20. Nathoe HM, van Dijk D, Jansen EW, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, van Boven WJ, et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 394-402.
21. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM, Huber PR, Block PC, Duke PG, et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 2004; 291: 1841-1849.
22. Straka Z, Widimsky P, Jirasek K, Stros P, Votava J, Vanek T, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery: final results from a prospective randomized study PRAGUE-4. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 789-793.
23. Zamvar V, Williams D, Hall J, Payne N, Cann C, Young K, et al. Assessment of neurocognitive impairment after off-pump and on-pump techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: prospective randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2002; 325: 1268-1271.
24. Widimsky P, Straka Z, Stros P, Jirasek K, Dvorak J, Votava J, et al. One-year coronary bypass graft patency: a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump surgery angiographic results of the PRAGUE-4 trial. Circulation 2004; 110: 3418-3423.
25. Gerola LR, Buffolo E, Jasbik W, Botelho B, Bosco J, Brasil LA, et al. Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in low-risk patients with one or two vessel disease: perioperative results in a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 569-573.
26. Hernandez F Jr, Brown JR, Likosky DS, Clough RA, Hess AL, Roth RM, et al. Neurocognitive outcomes of off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2007; 84: 1897-1903.
27. Møller CH, Perko MJ, Lund JT, Andersen LW, Kelbaek H, Madsen JK, et al. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: The Best Bypass Surgery Trial. Circulation 2010; 121: 498-504.
28. Niranjan G, Asimakopoulos G, Karagounis A, Cockerill G, Thompson M, Chandrasekaran V. Effects of cell saver autologous blood transfusion on blood loss and homologous blood transfusion requirements in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on- versus off-cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 271-277.
29. Motallebzadeh R, Bland JM, Markus HS, Kaski JC, Jahangiri M. Health-related quality of life outcome after on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized study. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 82: 615-619.
30. Kochamba GS, Yun KL, Pfeffer TA, Sintek CF, Khonsari S. Pulmonary abnormalities after coronary arterial bypass grafting operation: cardiopulmonary bypass versus mechanical stabilization. Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 69: 1466-1470.
31. Alwan K, Falcoz PE, Alwan J, Mouawad W, Oujaimi G, Chocron S, et al. Beating versus arrested heart coronary revascularization: evaluation by cardiac troponin I release. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 77: 2051-2055.
32. Wandschneider W, Thalmann M, Trampitsch E, Ziervogel G, Kobinia G. Off-pump coronary bypass operations significantly reduce S100 release: an indicator for less cerebral damage? Ann Thorac Surg 2000; 70: 1577-1579.
33. Smith A, Grattan A, Harper M, Royston D, Riedel BJ. Coronary revascularization: a procedure in transition from on-pump to off-pump? the role of glucose-insulin-potassium revisited in a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2002; 16: 413-420.
34. Sahlman A, Ahonen J, Nemlander A, Salmenpera M, Eriksson H, Ramo J, et al. Myocardial metabolism on off-pump surgery; a randomized study of 50 cases. Scand Cardiovasc J 2003; 37: 211-215.
35. Wehlin L, Vedin J, Vaage J, Lundahl J. Activation of complement and leukocyte receptors during on- and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2004; 25: 35-42.
36. Selvanayagam JB, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Robson MD, Kardos A, Neubauer S, et al. Effects of off-pump versus on-pump coronary surgery on reversible and irreversible myocardial injury: a randomized trial using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and biochemical markers. Circulation 2004; 109: 345-50.
37. Vedin J, Nyman H, Ericsson A, Hylander S, Vaage J. Cognitive function after on or off pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006; 30: 305-310.
38. Ascione R, Talpahewa S, Rajakaruna C, Reeves BC, Lovell AT, Cohen A, et al. Splanchnic organ injury during coronary surgery with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 97-103.
39. Cavalca V, Sisillo E, Veglia F, Tremoli E, Cighetti G, Salvi L, et al. Isoprostanes and oxidative stress in off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 562-567.
40. Morris CD, Puskas JD, Pusca SV, Lattouf OM, Cooper WA, Vassiliades TA, et al. Outcomes after off-pump reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting: 5. Innovations: //9th ISMICS Annual Scientific Meeting, San Francisco, California, USA, 2007: 181-182.
41. Tully PJ, Baker RA, Kneebone AC, Knight JL. Neuropsychologic and quality-of-life outcomes after coronary artery bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass: a prospective randomized trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2008; 22: 515-521.
42. Selnes OA, Grega MA, Bailey MM, Pham LD, Zeger SL, Baumgartner WA, et al. Do management strategies for coronary artery diseasev infiuence 6-year cognitive outcomes? Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 88: 445-454.
43. Van Dijk D, Nierich AP, Jansen EW, Nathoe HM, Suyker WJ, Diephuis JC, et al. Early outcome after off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: results from a randomized study. Circulation 2001; 104: 1761-1766.
44. Lee JD, Lee SJ, Tsushima WT, Yamauchi H, Lau WT, Popper J, et al. Benefits of off-pump bypass on neurologic and clinical morbidity: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Thorac Surg 2003; 76: 18-25.
45. Velissaris T, Tang AT, Murray M, Mehta RL, Wood PJ, Hett DA, et al. A prospective randomized study to evaluate stress response during beating-heart and conventional coronary revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2004; 78: 506-512.
46. Johansson-Synnergren M, Nilsson F, Bengtsson A, Jeppsson A, Wiklund L. Off-pump CABG reduces complement activation but does not significantly affect peripheral endothelial function:a prospective randomized study. Scand Cardiovasc J 2004; 38: 53-58.
47. Mariscalco G, Engström KG, Ferrarese S, Cozzi G, Bruno VD, Sessa F, et al. Relationship between atrial histopathology and atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 1364-1372.
48. Quaniers JM, Leruth J, Albert A, Limet RR, Defraigne JO. Comparison of inflammatory responses after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery using surface modifying additives circuit. Ann Thorac Surg 2006; 81: 1683-1690.
49. Michaux I, Filipovic M, Skarvan K, Schneiter S, Schumann R, Zerkowski HR, et al. Effects of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery Bypass graft surgery on right ventricular function. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006; 131: 1281-1288.
50. Ozkara C, Guler N, Batyraliev T, Okut H, Agirbasli M. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery reduce secretion of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1? Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 763-767.
51. Alamanni F, Dainese L, Naliato M, Gregu S, Agrifoglio M, Polvani GL, et al. On-and off-pump coronary surgery and perioperative myocardial infarction: an issue between incomplete And extensive revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2008; 34: 118-126.
52. Ascione R, Angelini GD. Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery the implications of the evidence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 125: 779-781.
53. Bonchek LI. Off-pump coronary bypassis it for everyone? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002; 124: 431-434.
54. Sedrakyan A, Wu AW, Parashar A, Bass EB, Treasure T. Off-pump surgery is associated with reduced occurrence of stroke and other morbidity as compared with traditional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of systematically reviewed trials. Stroke 2006; 37: 2759-2769.
55. Feng ZZ, Shi J, Zhao XW, Xu ZF. Meta-analysis of on-pump and off-pump coronary arterial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg 2009; 87: 757-765.
56. Cheng DC, Bainbridge D, Martin JE, Novick RJ; Evidence-Based Perioperative Clinical Outcomes Research Group. Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology 2005; 102: 188-203.
57. Wijeysundera DN, Beattie WS, Djaiani G, Rao V, Borger MA, Karkouti K, et al. Off-pump coronary artery surgery for reducing mortality and morbidity: meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 872-882.
58. Giri S, White CM, Dunn AB, Felton K, Freeman-Bosco L, Reddy P, et al. Oral amiodarone for prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery, the Atrial Fibrillation Supression Trial (AFIST): a randomised lacebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 830-836.
59. McKhann GM, Grega MA, Borowicz LM Jr, Baumgartner WA, Selnes OA. Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery: an update. Stroke 2006; 37: 562-571.
60. Kjaergard LL, Villumsen J, Gluud C. Reported methodologic quality and discrepancies between large and small randomized trials in meta-analyses. Ann Intern Med 2001; 135: 982-989.
61. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, Cook DJ, Jadad AR, Moher M, et al. Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet 1998; 352: 609-613.
62. Schulz KF, Chalmers I, Hayes RJ, Altman DG. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA 1995; 273: 408-412.