The assessment of the social cognition and object relations scale on TAT and interview data

Journal of Personality Assessment

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 372-379

  Inslegers, Ruth ^a   Vanheule, Stijn ^a   Meganck, Reitske ^a   Debaere, Virginie ^a   Trenson, Eline ^a   Desmet, Mattias ^a   Roelstraete, Bjorn ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBJECT RELATION; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STANDARD;

ADULT; BELGIUM; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBJECT ATTACHMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PSYCHOMETRICS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; THEMATIC APPERCEPTION TEST;

EID: 84862852991     PISSN: 00223891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00223891.2012.662187     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Ackerman, S. J., Clemence, A. J., Weatherill, R., & Hilsenroth, M. J. (2001). Use of the TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV Cluster B personality disorders. Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, 422-448.
2. Ackerman, S. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Clemence, A. J., Weatherill, R., & Fowler, J. C. (2001). Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations. Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, 295-306. (Pubitemid 32977699)
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed., text revision). Washington, DC: Author.
4. Barends, A., Westen, D., Leigh, J., Silbert, D., & Byers, S. (1990). Assessing Affect-Tone of relationship paradigms from TAT and interview data. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 329-332.
5. Briggs, S. R., & Cheek, J. M. (1986). The role of factor analysis in the development and evaluation of personality scales. Journal of Personality, 54, 106-148.
6. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K.A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7. Byrne, B. M. (2005). Factor analytic models: Viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 17-32. (Pubitemid 41060301)
8. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
9. Cogan, R., & Porcerelli, J. H. (1996). Object relations in abusive partner relationships: An empirical investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 106-115. (Pubitemid 26057141)
10. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
11. Dimaggio, G., Lysaker, P. H., Carcione, A., Nicol̀o, G., & Semerari, A. (2008). Know yourself and you shall know the other to a certain extent: Multiple paths of influence of self-reflection on mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 778-789.
12. Eurelings-Bontekoe, E. H. M., Luyten, P., & Snellen, W. (2009). Validation of a theory driven profile interpretation of the Dutch Short Form of the MMPI using TAT Social Cognitions and Object Relations Scale (SCORS). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 155-165.
13. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., &Williams, J. B.W. (1997). Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV axis I disorders. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harcourt Test.
14. First, M. B., Spitzer, R. L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J. B. W., & Benjamin, J. (1997). Structural Clinical Interview for DSM-IV axis II personality disorders. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harcourt Test.
15. Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
16. Fowler, J. C., Ackerman, S. J., Speanburg, S., Bailey, A., Blagys, M., & Conklin, A. C. (2004). Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: Evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, 306-322. (Pubitemid 39578817)
17. Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
18. Hibbard, S., Hilsenroth, M. J., Hibbard, J., & Nash, M. N. (1995). A validity study of two projective object representation measures. Psychological Assessment, 7, 432-439. (Pubitemid 26017341)
19. Hibbard, S., Mitchell, P., & Porcerelli, J. (2001). Internal consistency of the Object Relations and Social Cognition scales for the Thematic Apperception Test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 7, 408-419. (Pubitemid 34019966)
20. Hilsenroth, M., Stein, M., & Pinsker, J. (2007). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global rating method (SCORS-G; 3rd ed.). Unpublished manuscript, TheDerner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies,Adelphi University, Garden City, NY.
21. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
22. Huprich, S. K., & Greenberg, R. P. (2003). Advances in the assessment of object relations in the 1990s. Clinical Psychological Review, 23, 665-698. (Pubitemid 37100983)
23. Leigh, J., Westen, D., Barends, A., Mendel, M., & Byers S. (1992). The assessment of complexity of representations of people using TAT and interview data. Journal of Personality, 60, 809-837.
24. Lysaker, P. H., Dimaggio, G., Buck, K. D., Carcione, A., & Nicol̀o, G. (2007). Metacognition within narratives of schizophrenia: Associations with multiple domains of neurocognition. Schizophrenia Research, 93, 278-287. (Pubitemid 46817940)
25. Meyer, G. J. (1996). The Rorschach and MMPI: Toward a more scientifically differentiated understanding of cross-method assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 558-578. (Pubitemid 26382971)
26. Meyer, G. J., Finn, S. E., Eyde, L. D., Kay, G. G., Moreland, K. L., Dies, R. R., Reed, G. M. (2001). Psychological testing and psychological assessment: A review of evidence and issues. American Psychologist, 56, 128-165. (Pubitemid 33624315)
27. Murray, H. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test: Manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Muth́en, L.,&Muth́en,B. (2004). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles,CA: Muth́en &Muth́en.
29. Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
30. Peters, E. J., Hilsenroth, M. J., Eudell-Simmons, E. M., Blagys, M. D., & Handler, L. (2006). Reliability and validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in clinical use. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 617-626. (Pubitemid 44530276)
31. Pinsker-Aspen, J. H., Stein,M. B., & Hilsenroth,M. J. (2007). Clinical utility of early memories as a predictor of early therapeutic alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 44, 96-109. (Pubitemid 46569976)
32. Porcerelli, J. H., Cogan, R., & Hibbard, S. (1998). Cognitive and affective representations of people and MCMI-II personality psychopathology. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 535-540. (Pubitemid 28402248)
33. Porcerelli, J. H., Shahar, G., Blatt, S. J., Ford, R. Q., Mezza, J. A., & Greenlee, L. M. (2006). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Convergent validity and changes following inpatient treatment. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 407-417. (Pubitemid 44011289)
34. Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics. Berne, Switzerland: Haus Huber.
35. Stein, M. B., Hilsenroth, M., Pinsker-Aspen, J. H., & Primavera, L. (2009). Validity of DSM-IV AxisVGlobalAssessment of Relational Functioning Scale: Amultimethod assessment. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 197, 50-55.
36. Viglione, D. J. (1996). Data and issues to consider in reconciling self-report and the Rorschach. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67, 579-587.
37. Westen,D. (1990). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS):Manual for coding TAT data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
38. Westen,D. (1991). Social cognition and object relations. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 429-455.
39. Westen, D. (2006). Clinical Diagnostic Interview. Unpublished manuscript, Emory University, Atlanta, CA. Retrieved from http://www. psychsystems.net/lab
40. Westen, D., Barends, A., Leigh, J., Mendel, M., & Silbert, D. (1990). Social ognition and Object Relations Scale (SCORS): Manual for coding interview data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
41. Westen, D., Klepser, J., Ruffins, S. A., Silverman, M., Lifton, N., & Boekamp, J. (1991). Object relations in childhood and adolescence: The development of working representations. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 400-409.
42. Westen, D., Lohr, N., Silk, K. R., Gold, L., & Kerber, K. (1990). Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 355-364.