Validity of DSM-IV axis v global assessment of relational functioning scale: A multimethod assessment

Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Volumn 197, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 50-55

  Stein, Michelle B ^a   Hilsenroth, Mark ^b   Pinsker Aspen, Janet H ^b   Primavera, Louis ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c TOURO COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

GARF, IIP; Multimethod assessment; Relational functioning; SCORS

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; RATING SCALE; SELF REPORT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; VALIDITY; HUMAN RELATION; MENTAL STRESS; MOOD DISORDER; OBJECT RELATION; OUTPATIENT; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MOOD DISORDERS; OBJECT ATTACHMENT; OUTPATIENTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 59249102263     PISSN: 00223018     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181923ca1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ackerman S, Hilsenroth MJ, Clemence AJ, Weatherill R, Fowler JC (2000) The effects of social cognition and object representation on psychotherapy continuation. Bull Menninger Clin. 64:386-408.
2. Ackerman SJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Clemence AJ, Weatherill R, Fowler JC (2001) Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations. J Pers Assess. 77(2):295-306.
3. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, (4th ed). Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association.
4. Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull. 88:588-606.
5. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 107:238-246.
6. Bollen KA (1989) Structural Equations With Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.
7. Bornstein R (2002) A process dissociation approach to objective-projective test score interrelationships. J Pers Assess. 78:47-68.
8. Bryant FB, Yarnold PR (1995) Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In Grimm L, Yarnold PR (Eds), Reading and Understanding Multivariate Statistics (pp. 99-136). Washington (DC): APA.
9. Child I, Frank K, Storm T (1956) Self ratings and TAT: Their relations to each other and to adulthood background. J Pers. 25:96-114.
10. Dausch B, Miklowitz D, Richards J (1996) Global assessment of relational functioning scale (GARF): II. Reliability and validity in a sample of families of bipolar patients. Fam Process. 35:175-189.
11. Fabrigar L, Wegener D, MacCallum R, Strahan E (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychol Methods. 4:272-299.
12. Floyd FJ, Widaman KF (1995) Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 7:286-299.
13. Fowler C, Hilsenroth M, Handler L (1995) Early Memories: An exploration of theoretically derived queries and their clinical utility. Bull Menninger Clin. 59:79-98.
14. Fowler C, Ackerman S, Speanburg S, Bailey A, Blagys M, Conklin AC (2004) Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: Evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V. J Pers Assess. 83:306-322.
15. Group for the Advancement of Psychiatry Committee on the Family (GAP) (1996) Global assessment of relational functioning scale (GARF): 1. Background and Rationale. Fam Process. 35:155-172.
16. Hay P, Phil D, Katsikitis M, Begg J, DaCosta J, Blumenfeld N (2003) A two-year follow-up study and prospective evaluation of the DSM-IV Axis V. Psychiatr Serv. 54:1028-1030.
17. Hibbard S, Hilsenroth M, Hibbard J, Nash M (1995) A validity study of two projective representation measures. Psychol Assess. 7:332-339.
18. Hilsenroth M (2007) A programmatic study of short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy: Assessment, process, outcome, and training. Psychother Res. 17:31-45.
19. Hilsenroth M, Ackerman S, Blagys M, Baity M, Mooney M (2003) Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: An examination of statistical, clinically significant, and technique-specific change. J Nerv Ment Dis. 191: 349-357.
20. Hilsenroth M, Ackerman S, Blagys M, Baumann B, Baity M, Smith S, Price J, Smith C, Heindselman T, Mount M, Holdwick D (2000) Reliability and validity of DSM-IV Axis V. Am J Psychiatry. 157:1858-1863.
21. Hilsenroth M, Stein M, Pinsker J (2004) Social cognition and object relations scale: Global rating method (SCORS-G). Unpublished manuscript, Garden City, NY: The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University. For a copy of the manual, please email this address: mstein3@partners.org.
22. Horowitz LM, Alden LE, Wiggins JS, Pincus AL (2000) IIP-C: Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Manual. Psychological Corporation.
23. Hoyle R, Panter A (1995) Writing about structural equation models. In Hoyle RH (Ed), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues and Applications (pp. 158-176). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
24. Hu L, Bentler PM (1995) Evaluating Model Fit. In Hoyle RH (Ed), Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications (pp. 76-99). Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
25. Kenny DA, Kashy DA (1992) Analysis of the Multitrait-MultiMethod matrix by confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Bull. 112:165-172.
26. Marsh HW (1989) Confirmatory factor analyses of Multitrait-Multimethod data: Many problems and a few solutions. Appl Psychol Meas. 13:335-361.
27. McClelland D, Koestner R, Weinberger J (1989) How do self-attributed and implicit motives differ? Psychol Rev. 96:690-702.
28. Mottarella K, Philpot C, Fritzsche B (2001) Don't Take Out This Appendix! Generalizability of the global assessment of relational functioning scale. Am J Fam Ther. 29:271-278.
29. Peters EJ, Hilsenroth MJ, Eudell-Simmons EM, Blagys MD, Handler L (2006) Reliability and validity of the social cognition and object relations scale in clinical use. Psychother Res. 16:617-626.
30. Rosen K, McCollum E, Middleton K, Locke L, Bird K (1997) Interrater reliability and validity of the global assessment of relational functioning (GARF) scale in a clinical setting: A preliminary study. American J Fam Ther. 25:357-360.
31. Ross N, Doherty W (2001) Validity of the global assessment of relational functioning (GARF) when used by community-based therapists. Am J Fam Ther. 29:239-253.
32. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 86:420-428.
33. Steiger JH (1990) Structural model evaluation and modifications: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behav Appr. 25:173-180.
34. Stein MB, Pinsker JH, Hilsenroth MJ (2007) Borderline pathology and the personality assessment inventory (PAI): An evaluation of criterion and concurrent validity. J Pers Assess. 88:81-89.
35. Tucker LR, Lewis C (1973) A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika. 38:1-10.
36. Wilde NJ, Strauss E, Chelune G, Hermann B, Hunter M, Loring D, Martin R, Sherman (2003) Confirmatory factor analysis of the WMS-III in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. Psychol Assess. 15:56-63.
37. Wilkens L, White M (2001) Interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the global assessment of relational functioning (GARF) scale using a card sort method: A pilot study. Fam Ther. 28:157-170.
38. Yingling L, Miller W, McDonald A, Galewaler S (1998) GARF Assessment Sourcebook: Using the DSM-IV Global Assessment of Relational Functioning. Washington (DC): Taylor and Francis.