Reliability and validity of the Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale in clinical use

Psychotherapy Research

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 617-626

  Peters, Eric J ^a   Hilsenroth, Mark J ^b   Eudell Simmons, Erin M ^c   Blagys, Matthew D ^d   Handler, Leonard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b ADELPHI UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d AUSTEN RIGGS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHODYNAMICS; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SOCIAL COGNITION AND OBJECT RELATIONS SCALE; SOCIAL STATUS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 33749556452     PISSN: 10503307     EISSN: 14684381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10503300600591288     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Ackerman, S. and Clemence, J. and Weatherill, R. and Hilsenroth, J. (1999) Use of the TAT in the assessment of DSM-IV cluster B personality disorders Journal of Personality Assessment, 73, pp. 422-442.
2. Ackerman, S. and Hilsenroth, M. and Clemence, A. and Weatherill, R. and Fowler, J. C. (2000) The effects of social cognition and object representation on psychotherapy continuation Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 64, pp. 386-408.
3. Ackerman, S. and Hilsenroth, M. and Clemence, A. and Weatherill, R. and Fowler, J. C. (2001) Convergent validity of Rorschach and TAT scales of object relations Journal of Personality Assessment, 77, pp. 295-306.
4. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). WashingtonDC: Author.
5. Callahan, K. and Price, J. and Hilsenroth, M. (2003) Psychological assessment of adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse within a naturalistic clinical sample Journal of Personality Assessment, 80, pp. 173-184.
6. Cohen, J. (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. New York: Academic Press.
7. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1983) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences 2nd ed. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Field, N. and Sturgeon, S. and Puryear, R. and Hibbard, S. and Horowitz, M. (2001) Object relations as a predictor of adjustment in conjugal bereavement Development and Psychopathology, 13, pp. 399-412.
9. Finn, S. and Tonsager, M. (1992) Therapeutic effects of providing MMPI-2 test feedback to college students awaiting therapy Psychological Assessment, 4, pp. 278-287.
10. Finn, S. and Tonsager, M. (1997) Information-gathering and therapeutic models of assessment: Complementary paradigms Psychological Assessment, 19, pp. 374-385.
11. Fischer, C. (1994) Individualized psychological assessment. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Fleiss, J. (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
13. Ford, J. and Fisher, P. and Larson, L. (1997) Object relations as a predictor of treatment outcome with chronic post traumatic stress disorder Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, pp. 547-559.
14. Fowler, J. C. and Hilsenroth, M. J. and Handler, L. (1995) Early memories: An exploration of theoretically derived queries and their clinical utility Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 52, pp. 31-52.
15. Fowler, J. C. and Ackerman, S. and Speanburg, S. and Bailey, A. and Blagys, M. (2004) Personality and symptom change in treatment-refractory inpatients: Evaluation of the phase model of change using Rorschach, TAT, and DSM-IV Axis V Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, pp. 306-322.
16. Hemphill, J. (2003) Interpreting the magnitudes of correlation coefficients American Psychologist, 58, pp. 78-79.
17. Hibbard, S. and Hilsenroth, M. and Hibbard, J. and Nash, M. (1995) A validity study of two projective object representations measures Psychological Assessment, 7, pp. 432-439.
18. Hilsenroth, M. (2002). Adelphi University: Psychodynamic psychotherapy process and outcome research team. InP.Fonagy(Ed.), An open door review of outcome studies in psychoanalysis (2nd ed., pp. 241-247). London: International Psychoanalysis Association.
19. Hilsenroth, M. and Ackerman, S. and Blagys, M. (2001) Evaluating the phase model of change during short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy Psychotherapy Research, 11, pp. 29-47.
20. Hilsenroth, M. and Ackerman, S. and Blagys, M. and Baity, M. and Mooney, M. (2003) Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for depression: An evaluation of statistical, clinically significant, and technique specific change Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, pp. 349-357.
21. Hilsenroth, M. and Ackerman, S. and Blagys, M. and Baumann, B. and Baity, M. and Smith, S. and (2000) Reliability and validity of the DSM-IV Axis V American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, pp. 1858-1863.
22. Hilsenroth, M. and Callahan, K. and Eudell, E. (2003) Further reliability, convergent and discriminant validity of overall defensive functioning Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 191, pp. 730-737.
23. Hilsenroth, M. and Peters, E. and Ackerman, S. (2004) The development of the therapeutic alliance during psychological assessment: Patient and therapist perspectives across treatment Journal of Personality Assessment, 83, pp. 332-344.
24. Hilsenroth, M., Stein, M., & Pinsker, J. (2004). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Global Method (SCORS-G). Unpublished manuscript. The Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, Garden CityNY.
25. Huprich, S. and Greenberg, R. (2003) Advances in the assessment of object relations in the 1990s Clinical Psychology Review, 23, pp. 665-698.
26. Kaslow, N. and Reviere, S. and Chance, S. and Rogers, J. and Hatcher, C. and Wasserman, F. and (1997) An empirical study of the psychodynamics of suicide Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 46, pp. 777-796.
27. Porcerelli, J. and Cogan, R. and Hibbard, S. (1998) Cognitive and affective representations of people and MCMI-II personality psychopathology Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, pp. 535-540.
28. Porcerelli, J. and Hill, K. and Dauphin, V. (1995) Need-gratifying object relations and psychopathology Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 59, pp. 99-104.
29. Segal, H. and Westen, D. and Lohr, N. and Silk, K. (1993) Clinical assessment of object relations and social cognition using stories told to the picture arrangement subtest of the WAIS-R Journal of Personality Assessment, 61, pp. 58-80.
30. Shrout, P. and Fleiss, J. (1979) Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability Psychological Bulletin, 8, pp. 420-428.
31. Stricker, G., & Gooen-Piels, J. (2004). Projective assessment of object relations. InM. J.Hilsenroth & D. L.Segal(Eds.), Handbook of psychological assessment: Vol. 2. Personality Assessment (pp. 449-465). New York: Wiley.
32. Tramantano, G. and Javier, R. and Colon, M. (2003) Discriminating subgroups of borderline personality disorder: An assessment of object representations The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63, pp. 149-175.
33. Wechsler, D. (1981) Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. New York: Psychological Corporation.
34. Westen, D. (1995). Social Cognition and Object Relations Scale: Q-Sort for projective stories. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University Medical School.
35. Westen, D. and Arkowitz-Westen, L. (1998) Limitations of Axis II in diagnosing personality pathology in clinical practice American Journal of Psychiatry, 155, pp. 1767-1771.
36. Westen, D. and Lohr, N. and Silk, K. and Gold, L. and Kreber, K. (1990) Object relations and social cognition in borderlines, major depressives, and normals: A Thematic Apperception Test analysis Psychological Assessment, 2, pp. 355-364.
37. Westen, D. and Novotny, C. and Thompson-Brenner, H. (2004) The empirical status of empirically supported psychotherapies: Assumptions, findings, and reporting in controlled clinical trials Psychological Bulletin, 130, pp. 631-663.
38. Zittel-Conklin, C. and Westen, D. (2005) Borderline personality disorder in clinical practice American Journal of Psychiatry, 162, pp. 867-875.