Motion preservation and clinical outcome of porous coated motion cervical disk arthroplasty

Neurosurgery

Volumn 71, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 30-36

  Choi, David ^a   Petrik, Vladimir ^a   Fox, Sally ^a   Parkinson, Joy ^b   Timothy, Jake ^c   Gullan, Richard ^b  

^a NATIONAL HOSPITAL FOR NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY   (United Kingdom)

^b KING S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c LEEDS GENERAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Artificial disk; Cervical; Disk replacement; Diskectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM PAIN; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BONE PROSTHESIS; FEMALE; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTION CERVICAL DISK ARTHROPLASTY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); NECK DISABILITY INDEX; NECK PAIN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADICULOPATHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SHORT FORM 36; SPINAL CORD DISEASE;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISABILITY EVALUATION; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; HYDROXYAPATITES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL CORD DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84862843932     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31824e512e     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cloward RB. The anterior approach for removal of ruptured cervical disks. J Neurosurg. 1958;15(6):602-617.
2. Walker AE, Robinson RA. Anterior cervical fusion [in Spanish]. DiaMed. 1962;34(special):894-900.
3. Seo M, Choi D. Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality? Br J Neurosurg. 2008;22(2):195-199. (Pubitemid 351414898)
4. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81(4):519-528. (Pubitemid 29211592)
5. Mummaneni PV, Burkus JK, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Zdeblick TA. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;6(3):198-209. (Pubitemid 47066071)
6. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):759-763.
7. Pimenta L, McAfee PC, Cappuccino A, Cunningham BW, Diaz R, Coutinho E. Superiority of multilevel cervical arthroplasty outcomes versus single-level outcomes: 229 consecutive PCM prostheses. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(12):1337-1344.
8. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):384-389.
9. Cheng L, Nie L, Zhang L, Hou Y. Fusion versus Bryan cervical disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study. Int Orthop. 2009;33(5):1347-1351.
10. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Spine J. 2009;9(4):275-286.
11. Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23(6):367-371.
12. Grob D, Porchet F, Kleinstück FS, et al. A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):297-306.
13. Bartels RH, Donk R, Verbeek AL. No justification for cervical disk prostheses in clinical practice: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(6):1153-1160.
14. Yi S, Kim KN, Yang MS, et al. Difference in occurrence of heterotopic ossification according to prosthesis type in the cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(16):1556-1561.
15. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(24):2802-2806.
16. Suchomel P, Jurák L, Benes V III, Brabec R, Bradác O, Elgawhary S. Clinical results and development of heterotopic ossification in total cervical disc replacement during a 4-year follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(2):307-315.
17. Puzas JE, Miller MD, Rosier RN. Pathologic bone formation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989;(245):269-281.
18. Ahrengart L, Lindgren U. Heterotopic bone after hip arthroplasty: defining the patient at risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;(293):153-159. (Pubitemid 23242864)
19. Goel A, Sharp DJ. Heterotopic bone formation after hip replacement: the influence of the type of osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1991;73(2):255-257.
20. Wenger M, Hoonacker P, Zachee B, Lange R, Markwalder TM. Bryan cervical disc prostheses: preservation of function over time. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(2): 220-225.