The effect of pneumatic tube system on complete blood count parameters and thrombocyte donation in healthy donors

Transfusion and Apheresis Science

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 81-83

  Sari, Ismail ^a   Arslan, Aliriza ^a   Ozlu, Can ^a   Hacioglu, Sibel ^a   Dogu, Mehmet Hilmi ^a   Isler, Kamil ^a   Keskin, Ali ^a  

^a PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Apheresis; Blood count; Donor; Pneumatic tube

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN;

APHERESIS; ARTICLE; BLOOD CELL COUNT; BLOOD DONOR; BLOOD SAMPLING; DONOR SELECTION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LABORATORY; LEUKOCYTE DIFFERENTIAL COUNT; NORMAL HUMAN; PNEUMATIC TOOL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; THROMBOCYTE; THROMBOCYTE COUNT;

BLOOD CELL COUNT; BLOOD DONORS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PLATELETPHERESIS;

EID: 84862838256     PISSN: 14730502     EISSN: 18781683     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.transci.2012.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Fernandes C.M., Worster A., Eva K., et al. Pneumatic tube delivery system for blood samples reduces turnaround times without affecting sample quality. J Emerg Nurs 2006, 32:139-143.
2. Lancé M.D., Marcus M.A., van Oerle R., Theunissen H.M., Henskens Y.M. Platelet concentrate transport in pneumatic tube systems - does it work?. Vox Sang 2012, 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2011.
3. Muhtaroglu S. Sample quality and pneumatic tube systems. Turk J Biochem 2008, 33:29-30.
4. Sodi R., Darn S.M., Stott A. Pneumatic tube system induced haemolysis: assessing sample type susceptibility to haemolysis. Ann Clin Biochem 2004, 41:237-240.
5. Weaver D.K., Miller D., Leventhal E.A., Tropeano V. Evaluation of a computer directed pneumatic-tube system for pneumatic transport of blood specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 1978, 70:400-405.
6. Keshgegian A.A., Bull G.E. Evaluation of a soft-handling computerized pneumatic tube specimen delivery system: effects on analytical results and turnaround time. Am J Clin Pathol 1992, 97:535-540.
7. Kratz A., Salem R.O., Van Cott E.M. Effects of a pneumatic tube system on routine and novel hematology and coagulation parameters in healthy volunteers. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007, 131(2):293-296.
8. Wallin O., Soderberg J., Grankvist K., Jonsson P.A., Hultdin J. Preanalytical effects of pneumatic tube transport on routine haematology, coagulation parameters, platelet function and global coagulation. Clin Chem Lab Med 2008, 46(10):1443-1449.
9. Stair T.O., Howell J.M., Fitzgerald D.J., Bailey S.C., Bastasch M.D. Hemolysis of blood specimens transported from ED to laboratory by pneumatic tube. Am J Emerg Med 1995, 13(4):484-488.
10. Ellis G. An episode of increased hemolysis due to a defective pneumatic air tube delivery system. Clin Biochem 2009, 42(12):1265-1269.
11. Streichert T., Otto B., Schnabel C., et al. Determination of hemolysis thresholds by the use of data loggers in pneumatic tube systems. Clin Chem 2011, 57(10):1390-1397.
12. Hübner U., Böckel-Frohnhöfer N., Hummel B., Geisel J. The effect of a pneumatic tube transport system on platelet aggregation using optical aggregometry and the PFA-100. Clin Lab 2010, 56(1-2):59-64.
13. Bolliger D., Seeberger M.D., Tanaka K.A., et al. Pre-analytical effects of pneumatic tube transport on impedance platelet aggregometry. Platelets 2009, 20(7):458-465.