Ethical challenge: When clinicians act as surrogates for unrepresented patients

American Journal of Critical Care

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 202-207

  White, Douglas B ^a   Jonsen, Albert ^b   Lo, Bernard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c Greenwall Foundation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ETHICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LONG TERM CARE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PUBLIC OPINION; TERMINAL CARE; TRUST;

CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DECISION MAKING; ETHICAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; LIFE SUPPORT CARE; PATIENT ADVOCACY; PUBLIC OPINION; TERMINAL CARE; TRUST;

EID: 84862834155     PISSN: 10623264     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4037/AJCC2012514     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Cohen S, et al. Communication of end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31(9):1215-1221.
2. Prendergast TJ, Claessens MT, Luce JM. A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(4):1163-1167.
3. Arnold RM, Kellum J. Moral justifications for surrogate decision making in the intensive care unit: implications and limitations. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(5 Suppl):347S-353S.
4. Karp N, Wood E. Incapacitated and Alone: Health Care Decision-Making for the Unbefriended Elderly. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commision on Law and Aging; 2003:62.
5. Fader AM, et al. Implementing a "Do-Not-Resuscitate" (DNR) policy in a nursing home. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1989; 37(6): 544-548.
6. Gillick MR. Medical decision-making for the unbefriended nursing home resident. J Ethics Law Aging. 1995;1(2):87-92.
7. Lo B, et al. "Do not resuscitate" decisions. A prospective study at three teaching hospitals. Arch Intern Med. 1985; 145(6):1115-1117.
8. Smedira NG, et al. Withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(5): 309-315.
9. White DB, et al. Decisions to limit life-sustaining treatment for critically ill patients who lack both decision-making capacity and surrogate decision-makers. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(8):2053-2059.
10. White DB, et al. Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides? Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147 (1):34-40.
11. Asch DA, Hansen-Flaschen J, Lanken PN. Decisions to limit or continue life-sustaining treatment by critical care physicians in the United States: conflicts between physicians' practices and patients' wishes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995;151(2 Pt 1):288-292.
12. Fried TR, et al. Understanding the treatment preferences of seriously ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2002:346(14):1061-1066.
13. Patrick DL, et al. Measuring preferences for health states worse than death. Med Decis Making. 1994;14(1):9-18.
14. Pearlman RA, et al. Insights pertaining to patient assessments of states worse than death. J Clin Ethics. 1993;4(1): 33-41.
15. Jonsen A, Siegler M, Winslade W. Clinical Ethics. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 2010.
16. Brock DW. Good decisionmaking for incompetent patients. Hastings Cent Rep. 1994;24(6):S8-11.
17. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49(5):651-661.
18. Charles C, Whelan T, Gafni A. What do we mean by partnership in making decisions about treatment? BMJ. 1999; 319(7212):780-782.
19. Rai A, Siegler M, Lantos J. The physician as a health care proxy. Hastings Cent Rep. 1999;29(5):14-9.
20. California Probate Code. Section 4701.
21. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physicianpatient relationship. JAMA, 1992;267(16):2221-2226.
22. Emanuel EJ. A communal vision of care for incompetent patients. Hastings Cent Rep. 1987;17(5):15-20.
23. Veatch RM. Generalization of expertise. Stud Hastings Cent. 1973;1(2):29-40.
24. Rothman DJ, et al. Professional medical associations and their relationships with industry: a proposal for controlling conflict of interest. JAMA. 2009;301(13):1367-7132.
25. Cooke M. Cost consciousness in patient care-what is medical education's responsibility? N Engl J Med. 362(14):1253-1255.
26. Members of the Medical Professionalism Project (ABIM Foundation. ACP-ASIM Foundation, European Federation of Internal Medicine). Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136: 243-246.
27. Ward NS, et al. Perceptions of cost constraints, resource limitations, and rationing in United States intensive care units: results of a national survey. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(2):471-476.
28. Levinsky NG. The doctor's master. N Engl J Med. 1984;311 (24):1573-1575.
29. Institute of Medicine. Conflict of interest in medical research, education, and practice. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2009.
30. Meier DE. Voiceless and vulnerable: dementia patients without surrogates in an era of capitation. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45(3):375-377.
31. Levinsky NG. Nonfinancial conflicts of interest in research. N Engl J Med. 2002;347(10):759-761.
32. Azoulay E, et al., Prevalence and factors of intensive care unit conflicts: the conflicus study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2009;180(9)853-860.
33. Cook DJ, et al. Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. JAMA. 1995; 273(9):703-708.
34. Pearlman RA, Inui TS, Carter WB, Variability in physician bioethical decision-making. A case study of euthanasia. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97(3):420-425.
35. Wennberg JE. Unwarranted variations in healthcare delivery: implications for academic medical centres. BMJ. 2002; 325(7370):961-964.
36. Rydvall A, Lynöe N. Withholding and withdrawing lifesustaining treatment: a comparative study of the ethical reasoning of physicians and the general public. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R13.
37. Norris WM, et al. Treatment preferences for resuscitation and critical care among homeless persons. Chest. 2005; 127(6):2180-2187.
38. Burt RA. Death Is That Man Taking Names. New York, NY: The Milbank Memorial Fund; 2002.
39. Mariner WK. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1984;32(10):739-746.
40. Daniels N. Accountability for reasonableness. BMJ. 2000; 321(7272):1300-1301.
41. Daniels N, Sabin J. Limits to health care: fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers. Philos Public Aff. 1997;26(4):303-350.
42. Wilson RF. Hospital ethics committees as the forum of last resort: an idea whose time has not come. North Carolina Law Review. 1998;76:353-396.
43. Baggs JG, et al. Nurse-physician collaboration and satisfaction with the decision-making process in three critical care units. Am J Crit Care. 1997;6(5):393-399.
44. Baggs JG, et al. Association between nurse-physician collaboration and patient outcomes in three intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 1999;27(9):991-998.
45. Rothman DJ. Research ethics at Tuskegee and Willowbrook. Am J Med. 1984;77(6):A49.
46. Buck PS. My Several Worlds: A Personal Record. New York, NY: The John Day Company; 1954.