Multi-objective game-theory models for conflict analysis in reservoir watershed management

Chemosphere

Volumn 87, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 608-613

  Lee, Chih Sheng ^a  

^a KUN SHAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Conflict analysis; Game theory; Geographical information system (GIS); Land use management; Multi objective optimization; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

DECISION THEORY; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EUTROPHICATION; FORESTRY; GAME THEORY; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; LAND USE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT; RESERVOIRS (WATER); SOIL CONSERVATION; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; WATERSHEDS;

CONFLICT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS; EUTROPHICATION CONTROL; LAND-USE MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC INTERACTIONS; WATER QUALITY PROTECTION; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

DECISION MAKING;

DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAME THEORY; GIS; INNOVATION; LAND USE CHANGE; MULTIOBJECTIVE PROGRAMMING; NUMERICAL MODEL; RESERVOIR; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EUTROPHICATION; FOREST; GAME; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM; LAND USE; MULTI OBJECTIVE GAME THEORY MODEL; POLLUTANT; RESIDENTIAL AREA; SOIL PROPERTY; TAIWAN; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER SUPPLY; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

TAIWAN; TSENG-WEN BASIN;

EID: 84862794983     PISSN: 00456535     EISSN: 18791298     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.01.014     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bogardi I., Szidarovszky F. Application of game theory in water management. Appl. Math. Modell. 1976, 1:16-20.
2. Bruckmeier K. Interdisciplinary conflict analysis and conflict mitigation in local resource management. Ambio 2005, 34:65-73.
3. Camerer C.F. Progress in behavioral game theory. J. Econ. Perspect. 1997, 11:167-188.
4. Carraro C., Marchiori C., Sgobbi A. Negotiating on water: Insights from non-cooperative bargaining theory. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2007, 12:329-349.
5. Chang N.-B., Chen H.-W., Jeng K.-Y., Ning S.-K., Lee C.-S. Evaluating of non-point source loads in the reservoir watershed using the GIS/GPS/RS information technologies and numerical models. Water Int. 2001, 26:239-251.
6. Cohon J.L. Multi-objective Programming and Planning 1978, Academic Press, San Diego.
7. Council of Agriculture, 2009. Cost and Benefit of Agricultural Products, Taipei. (in Chinese, accessed 02.07.10). http://www.coa.gov.tw/view.php?catid=17759.
8. Davila E., Chang N.-B., Diwakaruni S. Landfill space consumption dynamics in the lower Rio Grande valley by grey integer programming-based games. J. Environ. Manage. 2005, 75:353-365.
9. Ganji A., Karamouz M., Khalili D. Development of stochastic dynamic Nash game model for reservoir operation. I. The symmetric stochastic model with perfect information. Adv. Water Resour. 2007, 30:528-542.
10. Gibbons R. An introduction to applicable game theory. J. Econ. Perspect. 1997, 11:127-149.
11. Lee C.-S., Chang S.-P. Interactive fuzzy optimization for an economic and environmental balance in a river system. Water Res. 2005, 39:221-231.
12. Lee C.-S., Wen C.-G. Application of multi-objective programming to water quality management in a river basin. J. Environ. Manage. 1996, 47:11-26.
13. Lee C.-S., Chang C.-H., Wen C.-G., Chang S.-P. Comprehensive nonpoint source pollution models for a free-range chicken farm in a rural watershed in Taiwan. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 139:23-32.
14. Lund J.R., Palmer R.N. Water resource system modeling for conflict resolution. Water Resour. Update 1997, 3(108):70-82.
15. Madani K. Game theory and water resources. J. Hydrol. 2010, 381:225-238.
16. Myerson R.B. On the value of game theory in social science. Ration. Soc. 1992, 4:62-73.
17. Osborne M., Rubinstein A. A Course of Game Theory 1994, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
18. Parrachino, I., Dinar, A., Patrone, F., 2006a. Cooperative Game Theory and its Application to Natural, Environmental, and Water Resource Issues: 3. Application to Water Resources. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4074, WPS4074, Washington, DC. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4074. (accessed 05.05.10). http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2006/11/21/000016406_20061121155643/Rendered/PDF/wps4074.pdf.
19. Parrachino, I., Zara, S., Patrone, F., 2006b. Cooperative Game Theory and its Application to Natural, Environmental, and Water Resource Issues: 1. Basic Theory. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4072, WPS4072, Washington, DC. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4072. (accessed 22.1011). http://econ.worldbank.org/external/default/main?pagePK=64165259&theSitePK=469382&piPK=64165421&menuPK=64166093&entityID=000016406_20061121155643.
20. Shields D.J., Tolwinski B., Kent B.M. Models for conflict resolution in ecosystem management. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 1999, 33:61-84.
21. Supalla R., Klaus B., Yeboah O., Bruins R. A game theory approach to decoding who will supply instream flow water. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2002, 38:959-966.
22. Suzuki M., Nakayama M. The cost assignment of the cooperative water resource development: a game theoretical approach. Manage. Sci. 1976, 22:1081-1086.
23. US Water Resources Council, 1973. Principles and Standards for Planning Water and Related Land Resources. Federal Register 38(174), Part III, 24778, September 10.
24. von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior 1944, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
25. Wang L.Z., Fang L., Hipel K.W. Water resources allocation: a cooperative game theoretic approach. J. Environ. Inf. 2003, 2:11-22.
26. Wen, C.-G., Kao, M.M., Lin, J.-F., Chang, S.-P., Lee, C.-S., 2005. Removing Nutrient Sources for Reservoir Watershed by Using Ecological Engineering Approaches. Taiwan Environmental Protection Administration, TEPA. Research Report of EPA, EPA-94-J1-02-09-06, Taipei (in Chinese).