Interrelationships between spontaneous and low-level stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans

Hearing Research

Volumn 285, Issue 1-2, 2012, Pages 20-28

  Bergevin, Christopher ^a   Fulcher, Analydia ^b   Richmond, Susan ^b   Velenovsky, David ^b   Lee, Jungmee ^c  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^c NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHRONIC OTITIS MEDIA; CONTROLLED STUDY; EARDRUM PERFORATION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; FREQUENCY MODULATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOW FREQUENCY NOISE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MIDDLE EAR EFFUSION; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; OTOSCOPY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; STIMULUS RESPONSE;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEA; EAR, MIDDLE; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMANS; LIZARDS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84862793173     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: 18785891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.02.001     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Bentsen T., Harte J.M., Dau T. Human cochlear tuning estimates from stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2011, 129:3797.
2. Bergevin, C, 2007. Comparative approaches to otoacoustic emissions: towards and understanding of why the ear emits sound, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
3. Bergevin C. Comparison of otoacoustic emissions within gecko Subfamilies: morphological Implications for auditory function in lizards. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2011, 12:203-217.
4. Bergevin C., Shera C. Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 127:2398.
5. Bergevin C., Velenovsky D., Bonine K. " Coupled, Active Oscillators and Lizard Otoacoustic Emissions" , What Fire Is in Mine Ears: Progress in Auditory Biomechanics 2011, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY.
6. Bergevin C., Velenovsky D.S., Bonine K.E. Tectorial membrane morphological variation: effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. Biophys. J. 2010, 99:1064-1072.
7. Bialek W., Wit H. Quantum limits to oscillator stability - theory and experiments on acoustic emissions from the human ear. Phys. Lett. A 1984, 104:173-178.
8. Burns E., Arehart K., Campbell S. Prevalence of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in neonates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992, 91:1571-1575.
9. Burns E.M. Long-term stability of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125:3166-3176.
10. Burns E.M., Strickland E.A., Tubis A., Jones K. Interactions among spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. I. Distortion products and linked emissions. Hear. Res. 1984, 16:271-278.
11. Chiappe M.E., Kozlov A.S., Hudspeth A.J. The structural and functional differentiation of hair cells in a Lizard's basilar Papilla suggests an operational principle of Amniote Cochleas. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:11978-11985.
12. Choi Y., Lee S., Parham K., Neely S., Kim D. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission: measurements in humans and simulations with an active cochlear model. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 123:2651-2669.
13. Cooper N., Manley G. " Comparative Auditory Mechanics: From Species to Species and from Base to Apex - A Moderated Discussion" , What Fire Is in Mine Ears: Progress in Auditory Biomechanics 2011, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY.
14. Elliott E. A ripple effect in the audiogram. Nature 1958, 181:1076.
15. Epp B., Verhey J.L., Mauermann M. Modeling cochlear dynamics: interrelation between cochlea mechanics and psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2010, 128:1870-1883.
16. Goodman S.S., Withnell R.H., Shera C.A. The origin of SFOAE microstructure in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 2003, 183:7-17.
17. Joris P., Bergevin C., Kalluri R., McLaughlin M., Michelet P., van der Heijden M., Shera C. Frequency selectivity in Old World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108:17516-17520.
18. Kalluri R., Shera C.A. Comparing stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions measured by compression, suppression, and spectral smoothing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122:3562.
19. Kalluri R., Shera C.A. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 121:2097-2110.
20. Keefe D.H., Ellison J.C., Fitzpatrick D.F., Gorga M.P. Two-tone suppression of stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2008, 123:1479-1494.
21. Kemp D. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1978, 64:1386-1391.
22. Kemp D. Evidence of mechanical nonlinearity and frequency selective wave amplification in the cochlea. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 1979, 224:37-45.
23. Kemp D.T. Towards a model for the origin of cochlear echoes. Hear. Res. 1980, 2:533-548.
24. Koppl C. Otoacoustic Emissions as an Indicator for Active Cochlear Mechanics: A Primitive Property of Vertebrate Auditory Organs 1995, Advances in Hearing Research, World Scientific, Singapore.
25. Koppl C., Manley G. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard II. Interactions with external tones. Hear. Res. 1994, 72:159-170.
26. Kulawiec J., Orlando M. The contribution of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions to the click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 1995, 16:515-520.
27. Lee J., Long G. Stimulus characteristics which lessen the impact of threshold fine-structure on estimates of hearing status. Hear. Res. 2012, 283:24-32.
28. Lineton B., Wildgoose C.M.B. Comparing two proposed measures of cochlear mechanical filter bandwidth based on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2009, 125:1558-1566.
29. Long G., Tubis A. Investigations into the nature of the association between threshold microstructure and otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1988, 36:125-138.
30. Long G., Tubis A. Modification of spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions and associated psychoacoustic microstructure by aspirin consumption. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 84:1343-1353.
31. Long G.R., Talmadge C.L. Spontaneous otoacoustic emission frequency is modulated by heartbeat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1997, 102:2831-2848.
32. Lonsbury-Martin B., Martin G., Probst R., Coats A. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. II. Cochlear anatomy. Hear. Res. 1988, 33:69-93.
33. Manley G. Evidence for an active process and a cochlear amplifier in nonmammals. J. Neurophysiol. 2001, 86:541-549.
34. Martin G., Lonsbury-Marin B., Probst R., Coats A. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions. Hear. Res. 1988, 33:49-68.
35. McFadden D., Plattsmier H.S. Aspirin abolishes spontaneous oto-acoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 76:443-448.
36. Moulin A., Collet L., Veuillet E., Morgon A. Interrelations between transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions, spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and acoustic distortion products in normally hearing subjects. Hear. Res. 1993, 65:216-233.
37. Murphy W., Tubis A., Talmadge C., Long G. Relaxation dynamics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions perturbed by external tones. II. Suppression of interacting emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 97:3711-3720.
38. Neely S., Norton S., Gorga M., Jesteadt W. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1988, 83:652-656.
39. Peake W.T., Ling A. Basilar-membrane motion in the alligator lizard: its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1980, 67:1736-1745.
40. Probst R., Coats A., Martin G., Lonsbury-Martin B. Spontaneous, click-evoked, and toneburst-evoked otoacoustic emissions from normal ears. Hear. Res. 1986, 21:261-275.
41. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1991, 89:2027.
42. Ruggero M., Rich N., Recio A., Narayan S., Robles L. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1997, 101:2151-2163.
43. Schairer K.S., Ellison J.C., Fitzpatrick D., Keefe D.H. Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2006, 120:901-914.
44. Shera C., Guinan J. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1999, 105:782-798.
45. Shera C., Guinan J. Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 113:2762-2772.
46. Shera C.A. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2003, 114:244-262.
47. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J., Oxenham A.J. Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99:3318-3323.
48. Shera C.A., Zweig G. Noninvasive measurement of the cochlear traveling-wave ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1993, 93:3333-3352.
49. Siegel J.H., Cerka A.J., Recio-Spinoso A., Temchin A.N., van Dijk P., Ruggero M.A. Delays of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions and cochlear vibrations contradict the theory of coherent reflection filtering. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2005, 118:2434-2443.
50. Sisto R., Moleti A. Transient evoked otoacoustic emission latency and cochlear tuning at different stimulus levels. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122:2183-2190.
51. Sisto R., Moleti A., Shera C. Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2007, 122:3554-3561.
52. Stewart C., Hudspeth A. Effects of salicylates and aminoglycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2000, 97:454-459.
53. Talmadge C., Long G., Murphy W., Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human-subjects. Hear. Res. 1993, 71:170-182.
54. Talmadge C., Tubis A. On modeling the connection between spontaneous and evoked otoacoustic emissions. Biophysics of Hair-Cell Sensory Systems 1993, 25-32. World Scientific Press. H. Duifhuis, J. Horst, P. van Dijk, S. van Netten (Eds.).
55. Talmadge C., Tubis A., Long G., Piskorski P. Modeling otoacoustic emission and hearing threshold fine structures. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1998, 104:1517-1543.
56. Talmadge C.L., Tubis A., Long G.R., Tong C. Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2000, 108:2911.
57. Thomas I. Microstructure of the pure-tone threshold. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1975, 57:S26.
58. van Dijk P., Maat B., de Kleine E. The effect of static ear canal pressure on human spontaneous otoacoustic emissions: spectral width as a measure of the intra-cochlear oscillation amplitude. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2011, 12:13-28.
59. van Hengel P., Duifhuis H., van den Raadt M. Spatial periodicity in the cochlea: the result of interaction of spontaneous emissions?. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1996, 99:3566-3571.
60. Whitehead M. Slow variations of the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 1991, 53:269-280.
61. Whitehead M.L., Kamal N., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in different racial groups. Scand. Audiol. 1993, 22:3-10.
62. Zurek P. Spontaneous narrowband acoustic-signals emitted by human ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1981, 69:514-523.
63. Zweig G., Shera C.A. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1995, 98:2018-2047.
64. Zwicker E. Otoacoustic emissions in research of inner ear signal processing. Cochlear Mechanisms and Otoacoustic Emissions 1990, 63-76. Karger. F. Grandori, G. Cianfrone, D. Kemp (Eds.).
65. Zwicker E., Schloth E. Interrelation of different oto-acoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1984, 75:1148-1154.