Tectorial membrane morphological variation: Effects upon stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1064-1072

  Bergevin, Christopher ^a   Velenovsky, David S ^b   Bonine, Kevin E ^a  

^a The University of Arizona   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANOLIS; ASPIDOSCELIS; MAMMALIA; REPTILIA; SQUAMATA; VERTEBRATA;

EID: 77958177715     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.06.012     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Dallos, P., A. Popper, and R. Fay. 1996. The cochlea. In Springer Handbook of Auditory Research.. Springer, New York.
2. Zwislocki, J., and E. Kletsky. 1979. Tectorial membrane: a possible effect on frequency analysis in the cochlea. Science. 204:639-641.
3. Allen, J. 1980. Cochlear micromechanics-a physical model of trans-duction. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 68:1660-1670.
4. Gummer, A., W. Hemmert, and H. Zenner. 1996. Resonant tectorial membrane motion in the inner ear: its crucial role in frequency tuning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 93:8727-8732.
5. Authier, S., and G. Manley. 1995. A model of frequency tuning in the basilar papilla of the Tokay gecko, Gekko gecko. Hear. Res. 82:1-13.
6. Nam, J., and R. Fettiplace. 2008. Theoretical conditions for high-frequency hair bundle oscillations in auditory hair cells. Biophys. J. 95:4948-4962.
7. Vilfan, A., and T. Duke. 2008. Frequency clustering in spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from a lizard's ear. Biophys. J. 95:4622-4630.
8. Dierkes, K., B. Linder, and F. Jülicher. 2008. Enhancement of sensitivity gain and frequency tuning by coupling of active hair bundles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:18651-18674.
9. Gu, J., W. Hemmert, ..., A. Aranyosi. 2008. Frequency-dependent shear impedance of the tectorial membrane. Biophys. J. 95:2529-2538.
10. Ghaffari, R., A. Aranyosi, and D. Freeman. 2007. Longitudinally propagating traveling waves of the mammalian tectorial membrane. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:16510-16515.
11. Russell, I., P. Legan, ..., G. Richardson. 2007. Sharpened cochlear tuning in a mouse with a genetically modified tectorial membrane. Nat. Neurosci. 10:215-223.
12. Köppl, C. 1995. Advances in Hearing Research: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Hearing. World Scientific, Singapore.
13. Bergevin, C., D. Freeman, ..., C. Shera. 2008. Otoacoustic emissions in humans, birds, lizards, and frogs: evidence for multiple generation mechanisms. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 194:665-683.
14. Coro, F., and M. Kössl. 1998. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions from the tympanic organ in two noctuoid moths. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 183:525-531.
15. Probst, R., B. Lonsbury-Martin, and G. Martin. 1991. A review of otoa-coustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:2027-2067.
16. Neely, S., and D. Kim. 1983. An active cochlear model showing sharp tuning and high sensitivity. Hear. Res. 9:123-130.
17. Shera, C., J. Guinan, and A. Oxenham. 2002. Revised estimates of human cochlear tuning from otoacoustic and behavioral measurements. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:3318-3323.
18. Moleti, A., and R. Sisto. 2003. Objective estimates of cochlear tuning by otoacoustic emission analysis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113: 423-429.
19. Sisto, R., A. Moleti, and C. A. Shera. 2007. Cochlear reflectivity in transmission-line models and otoacoustic emission characteristic time delays. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 122:3554-3561.
20. Bergevin, C., and C. A. Shera. 2010. Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in the gecko. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 127:2398-2409.
21. Rosowski, J., W. Peake, and J. White. 1984. Cochlear nonlinearities inferred from two-tone distortion products in the ear canal of the alligator lizard. Hear. Res. 13:141-158.
22. Manley, G., C. Köppl, and B. Johnstone. 1993. Distortion-product otoa-coustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I. General characteristics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 93:2820-2833.
23. Stewart, C., and A. Hudspeth. 2000. Effects of salicylates and amino-glycosides on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the Tokay gecko. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:454-459.
24. Manley, G. 2006. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions from freestanding stereovillar bundles of ten species of lizard with small papillae. Hear. Res. 212:33-47.
25. Wever, E. 1978. The Reptile Ear. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
26. Manley, G. 2000. Cochlear mechanisms from a phylogenetic viewpoint. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:11736-11743.
27. Peake, W., and A. Ling. 1980. Basilar-membrane motion in the alligator lizard: its relation to tonotopic organization and frequency selectivity. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:1736-1745.
28. Manley, G., G. Yates, and C. Köppl. 1988. Auditory peripheral tuning: evidence for a simple resonance phenomenon in the lizard tiliqua. Hear. Res. 33:181-190.
29. Miller, M. 1992. The Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, Chapt. 23. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.
30. Weiss, T., M. Mulroy, ..., C. Pike. 1976. Tuning of single fibers in the cochlear nerve of the alligator lizard: relation to receptor morphology. Brain Res. 115:71-90.
31. Turner, R. 1987. Neural tuning in the granite spiny lizard. Hear. Res. 26:287-299.
32. Manley, G. 2002. Evolution of structure and function of the hearing organ of lizards. J. Neurobiol. 53:202-211.
33. Taschenberger, G., L. Gallo, and G. Manley. 1995. Filtering of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear of birds and lizards. Hear. Res. 91:87-92.
34. Lukashkin, A., V. Lukashkina, ..., I. Russell. 2004. Role of the tectorial membrane revealed by otoacoustic emissions recorded from wild-type and transgenic tecta mice. J. Neurophysiol. 91:163-171.
35. Manley, G. 2000. Comparative hearing: birds and reptiles. In Springer Handbook of Auditory Research, Vol. 13, Chapt. 4. Springer, New York.
36. Schairer, K., J. Ellison, ..., D. Keefe. 2006. Use of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission latency and level to investigate cochlear mechanics in human ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 120:901-914.
37. Shera, C. A., and J. J. Guinan. 1999. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:782-798.
38. Shera, C. A., and J. J. Guinan. 2003. Stimulus-frequency-emission group delay: a test of coherent reflection filtering and a window on cochlear tuning. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2762-2772.
39. Cleveland, W. 1993. Visualizing Data. Hobart Press, Summit, NJ.
40. Bergevin, C., D. Velenovsky, and K. Bonine. 2010. Otoacoustic emission temperature dependence across the lacertilia. In Abstracts of the Thirty-Third Midwinter Research Meeting. Association for Research in Otolaryngology, Anaheim, CA.
41. Köppl, C., and G. Manley. 1993. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the bobtail lizard. I. General characteristics. Hear. Res. 71:157-169.
42. Manley, G., L. Gallo, and C. Köppl. 1996. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in two gecko species, Gekko gecko and Eublepharis macu-larius. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1588-1603.
43. Frishkopf, L., and D. DeRosier. 1983. Mechanical tuning of freestanding stereociliary bundles and frequency analysis in the alligator lizard cochlea. Hear. Res. 12:393-404.
44. Aranyosi, A., and D. Freeman. 2004. Sound-induced motions of individual cochlear hair bundles. Biophys. J. 87:3536-3546.
45. Strimbu, C., D. Ramunno-Johnson, ..., D. Bozovic. 2009. Correlated movement of hair bundles coupled to the otolithic membrane in the bullfrog sacculus. Hear. Res. 256:58-63.
46. Köppl, C. 1988. Morphology of the basilar papilla of the bobtail lizard tiliqua rugosa. Hear. Res. 35:209-228.
47. Zweig, G., and C. A. Shera. 1995. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98: 2018-2047.
48. Hubbard, A. 1993. A traveling-wave amplifier model of the cochlea. Science. 259:68-71.
49. Lukashkin, A., and I. Russell. 2003. A second, low-frequency mode of vibration in the intact mammalian cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:1544-1550.
50. Thalmann, I., G. Thallinger, ..., R. Thalmann. 1987. Composition and supramolecular organization of the tectorial membrane. Laryngoscope. 97:357-367.
51. Hasko, J., and G. Richardson. 1988. The ultrastructural organization and properties of the mouse tectorial membrane matrix. Hear. Res. 35:21-38.
52. Masaki, K., J. Gu, ..., A. Aranyosi. 2009. Col11a2 deletion reveals the molecular basis for tectorial membrane mechanical anisotropy. Bio-phys. J. 96:4717-4724.
53. Miller, M. 1974. Scanning electron microscope studies of some skink papillae basilares. Cell Tissue Res. 150:125-141.
54. He, D., K. Beisel, ..., R. Salvi. 2003. Chick hair cells do not exhibit voltage-dependent somatic motility. J. Physiol. 546:511-520.
55. Koppl, C., A. Forge, and G. Manley. 2004. Low density of membrane particles in auditory hair cells of lizards and birds suggests an absence of somatic motility. J. Comp. Neurol. 479:149-155.
56. Tanaka, K., and C. Smith. 1975. Structure of the avian tectorial membrane. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 84:287-296.
57. Marcinelli, D. 1977. Acoustic and visual display behavior in Gekkonid lizards. Am. Zool. 17:251-260.
58. Russell, A., D. Rittenhouse, and A. Bauer. 2000. Laryngotracheal morphology of Afro-Madagascan geckos: a comparative survey. J. Morphol. 245:241-268.
59. Chiappe, M., A. Kozlov, and A. Hudspeth. 2007. The structural and functional differentiation of hair cells in a lizard's basilar papilla suggests an operational principle of amniote cochleas. J. Neurosci. 27:11978-11985.
60. van Dijk, P., M. Mason, and P. Narins. 2002. Distortion product otoa-coustic emissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties. Hear. Res. 173:100-108.
61. Mulroy, M., and R. Williams. 1987. Auditory stereocilia in the alligator lizard. Hear. Res. 25:11-21.
62. Manley, G., and L. Gallo. 1997. Otoacoustic emissions, hair cells, and myosin motors. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1049-1055.
63. Losos, J., and C. Schneider. 2009. Anolis lizards. Curr. Biol. 19: R316-R318.
64. Miller, M. 1985. Quantitative studies of auditory hair cells and nerves in lizards. J. Comp. Neurol. 232:1-24.