Transcriptome analysis of tree peony during chilling requirement fulfillment: Assembling, annotation and markers discovering

Gene

Volumn 497, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 256-262

  Gai, Shupeng ^a   Zhang, Yuxi ^a   Mu, Ping ^a   Liu, Chunying ^a   Liu, Shao ^a   Dong, Lei ^a   Zheng, Guosheng ^a  

^a QINGDAO AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

454 pyrosequencing; Chilling treatment; Endo dormancy; Paeonia suffruticosa Andrews; SSR; Transcriptome

Indexed keywords

CONTIG; PRIMER DNA; PRIMER RNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; TRANSCRIPTOME;

ARTICLE; CONTIG MAPPING; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC POLYMORPHISM; INDUCED HYPOTHERMIA; LABORATORY DEVICE; NONHUMAN; PAEONIA SUFFRUTICOSA; PLANT GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYROSEQUENCING; SEED DORMANCY; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SIMPLE SEQUENCE REPEAT;

COLD TEMPERATURE; EXPRESSED SEQUENCE TAGS; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOME, PLANT; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PAEONIA; POLYMORPHISM, GENETIC; SEED DORMANCY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TREES;

PAEONIA SUFFRUTICOSA;

EID: 84862785809     PISSN: 03781119     EISSN: 18790038     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2011.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson J.V., Gesch R.W., Jia Y., Chao W.S., Horvath D.P. Seasonal shifts in dormancy status, carbohydrate metabolism, and related gene expression in crown buds of leafy spurge. Plant Cell Environ. 2005, 28:1567-1578.
2. Arora R., Rowland L.J., Tanino K. Induction and release of bud dormancy in woody perennials: a science comes of age. HortScience 2003, 38:911-921.
3. Bevan M., Walsh S. The Arabidopsis genome: a foundation for plant research. Genome Res. 2005, 5(12):1632-1642.
4. Bielenberg D.G., et al. Sequencing and annotation of the evergrowing locus in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] reveals a cluster of six MADS-box transcription factors as candidate genes for regulation of terminal bud formation. Tree Genet. Genomes 2008, 4:495-507.
5. Brunel N., Leduc N., Poupard P., Simoneau P., Mauqet J.C., Viemont J.D. KNAPA2, a class I KN1-like gene is a negative marker of bud growth potential in apple trees (Malus domestica [L.] Borkh.). J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53:2143-2149.
6. Ellegren H. Sequencing goes 454 and takes large-scale genomics into the wild. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17(7):1629-1631.
7. Faust M., Erez A., Rowland I.J., Wang S.Y., Norman H.A. Bud dormancy in perennial fruit trees: physiological basis for dormancy induction, maintenance, and release. HortScience 1997, 32:623-628.
8. Faye M.R., Jennifer K.H., Harry T.H., Peter J.D., David J.H. Overexpression of a KNOTTED-like homeobox gene of potato alters vegetative development by decreasing gibberellin accumulation. Plant Physiol. 2003, 132:106-117.
9. Halaly T., et al. Similar mechanisms might be triggered by alternative external stimuli that induce dormancy release in grape buds. Planta 2008, 228:79-88.
10. Han X.Y., Wang L.S., Shu Q.Y., Liu Z.A., Xu S.X., Tetsumura T. Molecular characterization of tree peony germplasm using sequence-related amplified polymorphism markers. Biochem. Genet. 2008, 46:162-179.
11. Hong D.Y., Pan K.Y. Notes on taxonomy of Paeonia sect. Moutan DC. (Paeoniaceae). Acta Phytotax. Sin. 2005, 43:169-177.
12. Hong D.Y., Pan K.Y. Additional taxonomic notes on Paeonia sect. Moutan (Paeoniaceae). Acta Phytotax. Sin. 2005, 43:284-287.
13. Hong D.Y., Pan K.Y. Paeonia cathayana D.Y. Hong & K.Y. Pan, a new tree peony, with revision of P. suffruticosa ssp. yinpingmudan. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 2007, 45:285-288.
14. Hou X.G., Guo D.L., Cheng S.P., Zhang J.Y. Development of thirty new polymorphic microsatellite primers for Paeonia suffruticosa. Biol. Plant. 2011, 55(4):708-710.
15. Huang F., Chi Y.J., Meng Q.C., Gai J.G., Yu D.Y. Gm ZFP1 coding a single zinc finger protein is expressed with enhancement in reproductive organs and late seed development in soybean (Glycine max). Mol. Biol. Rep. 2006, 33:279-285.
16. Huang X., et al. Genes associated with the release of dormant buds in Tree Peonies (Paeonia suffruticosa). Acta Physiol. Plant. 2008, 30(6):797-806.
17. Huang X., et al. The involvement of mitochondrial phosphate transporter in accelerating bud dormancy release during chilling treatment of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Planta 2008, 228(4):545-552.
18. Jain M., et al. F-box protein in rice. Genome-wide analysis, classification, temporal and spatial gene expression during panicle and seed development, and regulation by light and abiotic stress. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:1467-1483.
19. Lalitha S. Primer premier 5. Biotech. Software Internet Rep. 2000, 1:270-272.
20. Lang G.A., Martin G.C. Endo-, para-, and eco-dormancy: physiological terminology and classification for dormancy research. HortScience 1987, 22:371-377.
21. Li C.H., et al. Flavonoid composition and antioxidant activity of tree peony (Paeonia Section Moutan) yellow flowers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57:8496-8503.
22. Li C.Y., Anneli V.A., Tuula P., Olavi J., Pekka H., Palva E.T. Ecotype-dependent control of growth Dormancy and freezing tolerance under seasonal changes in Betula pendula Roth. Trees Struct. Funct. 2003, 17:127-132.
23. Li Q., Wan J.M. SSR Hunter: Development of a local searching software for SSR sites. Hereditas 2005, 27:808-810.
24. Li Y., et al. EST analysis reveals putative genes involved in glycyrrhizin biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:268-278.
25. Lomax J. Get ready to GO! A biologist's guide to the Gene Ontology. Brief. Bioinform. 2005, 6(3):298-304.
26. Luo H.M., et al. Comparison of 454-ESTs from Huperzia serrate and Phlegmariurus carinatus reveals putative genes involved in lycopodium alkaloid biosynthesis and developmental regulation. BMC Plant Biol. 2010, 10:209-225.
27. Margulies M., et al. Genome Sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 2005, 437:376-380.
28. Meyer E., et al. Sequencing and de novo analysis of a coral larval transcriptome using 454 GS FLX. BMC Genomics 2009, 10:219-236.
29. Morgante M., Hanafey M., Powell W. Microsatellites are preferentially associated with nonrepetive DNA in plant genomes. Nat. Genet. 2002, 30:194-200.
30. Ophir R., et al. Gene-expression profiling of grape bud response to two alternative dormancy-release stimuli expose possible links between impaired mitochondrial activity, hypoxia, ethylene-ABA interplay and cell enlargement. Plant Mol. Biol. 2009, 71:403-423.
31. Or E. Grape bud dormancy release- the molecular aspect. Grapevine Molecular Physiology & Biotechnology 2009, 1-29. Springer Science, German. 2nd edition. K.A. Roubelakis-Angelakis (Ed.).
32. Or E., Vilozny I., Eyal Y., Ogrodovitch A. The transduction of the signal for grape bud dormancy breaking induced by hydrogen cyanamide may involve the SNF-like protein kinase GDBRPK. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 43:483-494.
33. Or E., Vilozny I., Eyal Y., Ogrodovitch A. Dormancy in grape buds: Isolation and characterization of catalase cDNA and analysis of its expression following chemical induction of bud dormancy release. Plant Sci. 2002, 162:121-130.
34. Pacey-Miller T., et al. Genes associated with the end of dormancy in grapes. Funct. Intergr. Genomics 2003, 3:144-152.
35. Pang X., et al. Involvement of calcium signaling in dormancy release of grape buds. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:3249-3262.
36. Saure M. Dormancy release in deciduous fruit trees. Hort. Rev. 1985, 7:239-300.
37. Shu Q.Y., et al. Functional annotation of expressed sequence tags as a tool to understand the molecular mechanism controlling flower bud development in tree peony. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 135:436-449.
38. Singh K.B., Foley R.C., Onate-Sanchez L. Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5(5):430-436.
39. Sun C., et al. Sequencing and de novo analysis of American ginseng root transcriptome using a GS FLX Titanium platform to discover putative genes involved in ginsenoside biosynthesis. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:262-273.
40. Temnykh S., et al. Computational and experimental analysis of microsatellites in rice (Oryza sativa L.): frequency, length variation, transposon associations, and genetic marker potential. Genome Res. 2001, 11:1441-1452.
41. Theißen G. Development of floral organ identity: stories from the MADS house. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4:75-85.
42. Thiel T., Michalek W., Varshney R.K., Graner A. Exploiting EST databases for the development and characterization of gene-derived SSR-markers in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Theor. Appl. Genet. 2003, 106:411-422.
43. Varsjmeu R.K., Thiel T., Stein N., Langridge P., Graner A. In silico analysis on frequency and distribution of microsatellites in ESTs of some cereal species. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2002, 7:537-546.
44. Vera J.C., et al. Rapid transcriptome characterization for a nonmodel organism using 454 pyrosequencing. Mol. Ecol. 2008, 17(7):1636-1647.
45. Wang J.X., Xia T., Zhang J.M., Zhou S.L. Isolation and characterization of fourteen microsatellites from a tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa). Conserv. Genet. 2009, 10:1029-1031.
46. Wang L.S., Shiraishi A., Hashimoto F., Aoki N., Shimizu K., Sakata Y. Phenetics in tree peony species from china by flower pigment cluster analysis. J. Plant Res. 2001, 114:33-43.
47. Wang Z.H., Zhang Y.X. Studies on morphogenesis and life cycle of the flower bud of tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.). J. Shandong Agric. Univ. 1987, 3:9-15.
48. Wang Z.Z., Han L., Kong F.J. Effects of temperature treatment on flowering and leafing of Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. Acta Hort. Sin. 1996, 23(3):307-308.
49. Yilmaz S., Mittler R. The zinc finger network of plants. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2008, 65(7-8):1150-1160.
50. Zeng S.H., et al. Development of EST dataset and characterization of EST-SSRs in a traditional Chinese medicinal plant, Epimedium sagittatum (Sieb. Et Zucc.) Maxim. BMC Genomics 2010, 11:94-104.
51. Zhang J.J., Shu Q.Y., Liu Z.A., Ren H.X., Wang L.S., De Keyser E. Two EST-derived marker systems for cultivar identification in tree peony. Plant Cell Rep. 2011, 10.1007/s00299-011-1164-1.
52. Zhang J.M., Wang J.X., Xia T., Zhou S.L. DNA barcoding: species delimitation in tree peonies. Sci. China Ser. C-Life Sci. 2009, 52(6):568-578.
53. Zhou Y., et al. The Schistosoma japonicum genome reveals features of host-parasite interplay. Nature 2009, 460(16):345-352.
54. Zhou Z.Q., Pan K.Y., Hong D.Y. Advances in studies on relationships among wild tree peony species and the origin of cultivated tree peonies. Acta Hort. Sin. 2003, 30:751-757.