Estimating Human Error Probability using a modified CREAM

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 100, Issue , 2012, Pages 28-32

  Sun, Zhiqiang ^a   Li, Zhengyi ^b   Gong, Erling ^a   Xie, Hongwei ^a  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF DEFENSE TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Changsha Social Work College   (China)

Author keywords

Common performance condition; CREAM; Human Error Probability; Human reliability

Indexed keywords

COMMON PERFORMANCE CONDITION; CREAM; HUMAN ERROR PROBABILITY; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; HUMAN RELIABILITY; POINT ESTIMATION; PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT; REASONABILITY; SOCIOTECHNICAL SYSTEMS;

ERRORS;

ESTIMATION;

EID: 84862785026     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.12.017     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. R.L. Boring, S.M.L. Hendrickson, and J.A. Forester Issues in benchmarking human reliability analysis methods: a literature review Reliability Engineering & System Safety 95 6 2010 591 605
2. A.D. Swain, and H.E. Guttmann Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC
3. Williams JC. A data-based method for assessing and reducing human error to improve operational performance. In: Proceedings of IEEE 4th conference on human factor and power plants. 1988. Monterey, California: p. 43653.
4. D.I. Gertman, H.S. Blackman, and J. Marble The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method 2005 US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington DC
5. E. Hollnagel Cognitive error and error analysis method 1998 Elsevier London
6. M. Cepin DEPEND-HRA: a method for consideration of dependency in human reliability analysis Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93 10 2008 1452 1460 (Pubitemid 351657685)
7. K.S. Park, and J. Lee A new method for estimating human error probabilities: AHP-SLIM Reliability Engineering & System Safety 93 4 2008 578 587 (Pubitemid 350245444)
8. Z.Q. Sun, H.W. Xie, and X.J. Shi Engineering approach for human error probability quantification Journal of Systems Engineering and Electronics 20 5 2009 1144 1152
9. M. Cepin Importance of human contribution within the human reliability analysis (IJS-HRA) Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 21 3 2008 268 276 (Pubitemid 351645091)
10. Y.H.J. Chang, and A. Mosleh Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents part 5: dynamic probabilistic simulation of the IDAC model Reliability Engineering & System Safety 92 8 2007 1076 1101 (Pubitemid 46331146)
11. Y. Fujita, and E. Hollnagel Failures without errors: quantification of context in HRA Reliability Engineering & System Safety 83 2 2004 145 151
12. M.C. Kim, P.H. Seong, and E. Hollnagel A probabilistic approach for determining the control mode in CREAM Reliability Engineering & System Safety 91 2 2006 191 199 (Pubitemid 41394417)
13. Z.Q. Sun, H.W. Xie, and X.X. Li Determination of control modes in CREAM method based on fuzzy logic [in Chinese] China Safety Science Journal 17 5 2007 21 26
14. X.H. He, Y. Wang, and Z.P. Shen A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 3 2008 298 306 (Pubitemid 47499016)
15. G.E. Apostolakis, V.M. Bier, and A. Mosleh A critique of recent model for human error rate assessment Reliability Engineering & System Safety 22 14 1988 201 217
16. Blackman HS, Gertman DI, Boring RL. Human error quantification using performance shaping factors in the SPAR-H method. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2008.