DEPEND-HRA-A method for consideration of dependency in human reliability analysis

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 93, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1452-1460

  Čepin, Marko ^a  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

Dependent events; Human reliability analysis; Post initiators; Pre initiators

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

DEPENDENT EVENTS; HUMAN RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; POST-INITIATORS; PRE-INITIATORS;

RELIABILITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 43249120132     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Čepin M., and He X. Development of a method for consideration of dependency between human failure events. In: Soares C.G., and Zio E. (Eds). Proceedings of ESREL2006: safety and reliability for managing risk (2006) 285-291
2. Čepin M. Importance of human contribution within the human reliability analysis (IJS-HRA). J Loss Prevent Process Ind 2007 〈http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.012〉.
3. Moieni P., Spurgin J.A., and Singh A. Advances in HRA, methodology. Part I: frameworks, models, and data. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 44 (1994) 27-55
4. Clément B., and Leskovar M. Thematic network for a Phebus FPT-1 International Standard Problem (THENPHEBISP). Nucl Eng Design 235 (2005) 347-357
5. NUREG/CR-1278 (SAND80-0200). Handbook for human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plants application. US NRC, August 1983.
6. NUREG/CR-2254 (SAND81-1655). A procedure for conducting a human reliability analysis for nuclear power plants. US NRC, May 1983.
7. NUREG/CR-4772. Accident sequence evaluation program: human reliability analysis procedure. US NRC, February 1987.
8. Grobbelaar JF, Julius JA, Rahn F. Analysis of dependent human failure events using the EPRI HRA calculator. In: PSA05 Proceedings, 2005. p. 499-501.
9. NUREG/CR-6883. The SPAR-H human reliability analysis method. NRC, 2005.
10. Shen S. HRA methodology applied in Surry power station. In: PSA05 Proceedings, 2005. p. 615-8.
11. Mosleh A., and Chang Y.H. Model-based human reliability analysis: prospects and requirements. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 (2004) 241-253
12. Le Bot P. Human reliability data, human error and accident models-illustration through the three mile island accident analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 (2004) 153-167
13. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method, CREAM (1998), Elsevier Science Ltd., Amsterdam
14. NUREG-1624. Technical basis and implementation guidelines for a technique for human event analysis (ATHEANA), Rev. 1, 2000.
15. Forester J., Bley D., Cooper S., Lois E., Siu N., Kolaczkowski A., et al. Expert elicitation approach for performing ATHEANA quantification. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 (2004) 207-220
16. Reer B., Dang V.N., and Hirschberg S. The CESA method and its applications in a plant-specific pilot study on errors of commission. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 (2004) 187-205
17. Good practices for implementing human reliability analysis (HRA), NUREG-1792. Final report, US NRC, 2005.
18. Zhang L., He X., Dai L., and Huang X. The simulator experimental study on the operator reliability of Qinshan nuclear power plant. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92 2 (2007) 252-259
19. IAEA-TECDOC-499. Models and data requirements for human reliability analysis. Vienna: IAEA; 1989.
20. Safety Series No. 50-P-10. Human reliability analysis in probabilistic safety assessment for nuclear power plants. Vienna: IAEA; 1995.
21. Holy J. Some insights from recent applications of HRA methods in PSA effort and plant operation feedback in Czech Republic. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 83 2 (2004) 169-177
22. ASME RA-S-2002. Standard for probabilistic risk assessment for nuclear power plant applications. The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2002.
23. Regulatory Guide 1200. An approach for determining the technical adequacy of probabilistic risk assessment results for risk-informed activities. US NRC, 2004.
24. NUREG/CR-2300. PRA procedures guide. ANS-IEEE-US NRC, January 1983.
25. US NRC Regulatory Guide 1.174. An approach for using probabilistic risk assessment in risk-informed decisions on plant-specific changes to the licensing basis, Revision 1. US NRC, 2002.
26. Čepin M., and Mavko B. A dynamic fault tree. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 75 1 (2002) 83-91
27. Čepin M., and Mavko B. Probabilistic safety assessment improves surveillance requirements in technical specifications. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 56 (1997) 69-77
28. Mavko B., and Čepin M. Comparison of testing strategies. Electrotech Rev 64 2/3 (1997) 142-147 (in Slovenian)
29. Čepin M. Optimization of safety equipment outages improves safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 77 (2002) 71-80
30. Čepin M. Optimisation of scheduling of safety equipment testing and maintenance based on minimal risk. Electrotech Rev 70 1-2 (2003) 22-26
31. Čepin M. Analysis of truncation limit in probabilistic safety assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 87 3 (2005) 395-403
32. Vaurio J.K. Modelling and quantification of dependent repeatable human errors in system analysis in risk assessment. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 71 (2001) 179-188
33. Kirwan B. A guide to practical human reliability assessment (1994), Taylor & Francis, London