Does single-port access (SPA) laparoscopy mean reduced pain? A retrospective cohort analysis between SPA and conventional laparoscopy

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 162, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 71-74

  Kim, Tae Joong ^a   Lee, Yoo Young ^a   An, Jung Joo ^a   Choi, Chel Hun ^a   Lee, Jeong Won ^a   Kim, Byoung Gie ^a   Bae, Duk Soo ^a  

^a Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Benign ovarian tumor; Laparoscopy; Perioperative outcome; Postoperative pain; Single port access

Indexed keywords

KETOPROFEN;

ADNEXA DISEASE; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SINGLE PORT ACCESS LAPAROSCOPY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 84862783842     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: 18727654     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Romanelli JR, Earle DB. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 2009;23:1419-27.
2. Lee YY, Kim TJ, Kim CJ, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery versus conventional laparoscopic adnexal surgery: a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2010;151:181-4.
3. Kim TJ, Lee YY, Kim MJ, et al. Single port access laparoscopic adnexal surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2009;16:612-5.
4. Ramirez PT. Single-port laparoscopic surgery: is a single incision the next frontier in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114: 143-4.
5. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:43-6. (Pubitemid 40883930)
6. White WM, Goel RK, Kaouk JH. Single-port laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery: initial operative experience and comparative outcomes. Urology 2009;73:1279-82.
7. Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 2009;55: 1198-204.
8. Salati M, Brunelli A, Xiume F, et al. Uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax: clinical and economic analysis in comparison to the traditional approach. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:63-6. (Pubitemid 351239928)
9. Chen YJ, Wang PH, Ocampo EJ, Twu NF, Yen MS, Chao KC. Single-port compared with conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117:906-12.
10. Ghezzi F, Cromi A, Colombo G, et al. Minimizing ancillary ports size in gynecologic laparoscopy: a randomized trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:480-5. (Pubitemid 41758421)
11. Sarli L, Iusco D, Gobbi S, Porrini C, Ferro M, Roncoroni L. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed with mini-instruments. Br J Surg 2003;90:1345-8. (Pubitemid 37421667)
12. Bresadola F, Pasqualucci A, Donini A, et al. Elective transumbilical compared with standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Eur J Surg 1999;165:29-34. (Pubitemid 29378647)
13. Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, et al. Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 2009;57:95-101.
14. Jung YW, Lee M, Yim GW, et al. A randomized prospective study of single-port and four-port approaches for hysterectomy in terms of postoperative pain. Surg Endosc 2011.
15. Kim JH, Lee YS, Shin HW, Chang MS, Park YC, Kim WY. Effect of administration of ketorolac and local anaesthetic infiltration for pain relief after laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J Int Med Res 2005;33:372-8. (Pubitemid 41057434)