Increased new bone formation with a surface magnesium-incorporated deproteinized porcine bone substitute in rabbit calvarial defects

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part A

Volumn 100 A, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 834-840

  Park, Jin Woo ^a   Ko, Hyuk Jin ^a   Jang, Je Hee ^a   Kang, Hochang ^b   Suh, Jo Young ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^b AmorePacific   (South Korea)

Author keywords

bone substitute; histomorphometry; magnesium; osteoconductivity; surface modification

Indexed keywords

BONE FORMATION; BONE HEALING; BONE SUBSTITUTES; BOVINE BONE; CALVARIAL DEFECTS; CANCELLOUS BONE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITIONS; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X-RAY; ENHANCEMENT EFFECTS; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC ANALYSIS; HISTOMORPHOMETRY; HYDROTHERMAL TREATMENTS; NEW ZEALAND WHITE RABBIT; OSSEOUS DEFECTS; OSTEOCONDUCTIVE; OSTEOCONDUCTIVITY; SURFACE NANOSTRUCTURE;

BIOMATERIALS; MAGNESIUM; MAMMALS; METAL IONS; NANOSTRUCTURES; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SURFACE DEFECTS; SURFACE TREATMENT; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY;

BONE;

INTEGRIN; MAGNESIUM ION; NANOMATERIAL;

ALKALINITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE GRAFT; CANCELLOUS BONE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FRACTURE HEALING; HYDROTHERAPY; LIGAND BINDING; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; OSSIFICATION; SAMPLE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SKULL DEFECT; X RAY PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; X RAY SPECTROMETRY;

ANIMALS; BONE DEVELOPMENT; BONE SUBSTITUTES; MAGNESIUM; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; PHOTOELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY; RABBITS; SWINE;

EID: 84862778350     PISSN: 15493296     EISSN: 15524965     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34017     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Wallace SS, Froum SJ,. Effect of maxillary sinus augmentation on the survival of endosseous dental implants. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003; 8: 328-343.
2. Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L, Weinstein R,. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004; 24: 565-577.
3. Jensen T, Schou S, Stavropoulos A, et al. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation with Bio-Oss or Bio-Oss mixed with autogenous bone as graft: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011. 02168.x.
4. Valentini P, Abensur DJ,. Maxillary sinus grafting with anorganic bovine bone: A clinical report of long-term results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 556-560.
5. John HD, Wenz B,. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 199-207.
6. Simion M, Fontana F, Rasperini G, Maiorana C,. Vertical ridge augmentation by expanded-polytetrafluoroethylene membrane and a combination of intraoral autogenous bone graft and deproteinized anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18: 620-629.
7. Aldredge WA, Nejat R,. Delayed implant procedure using deproteinized bovine bone mineral: A report of 109 consecutive cases. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2011; 32: 66-71.
8. Hatano N, Shimizu Y, Ooya K,. A clinical long-term radiographic evaluation of graft height changes after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 2:1 autogenous bone/xenograft mixture and simultaneous placement of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 339-345.
9. Arcuri C, Cecchetti F, Germano F, et al. Clinical and histological study of a xenogenic bone substitute used as a filler in postextractive alveolus. Minerva Stomatol 2005; 54: 351-362.
10. Pagliani L, Andersson P, Lanza M, et al. A collagenated porcine bone substitute for augmentation at Neoss implant sites: A prospective 1-year multicenter case series study with histology. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010. 00314.x.
11. Calvo-Guirado JL, Ramirez-Fernandez MP, Negri B, et al. Experimental model of bone response to collagenized xenografts of porcine origin: A radiological and histomorphometric study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011;doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011. 00357.x.
12. Ramirez-Fernandez MP, Calvo-Guirado JL, de val Delgado-Ruiz RA, et al. Bone response to hydroxyapatites with open porosity of animal origin (porcine [OsteoBiol®mp3] and [Endobon®]): A radiological and histomorphometric study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 767-773.
13. Araujo MG, Linder E, Lindhe J,. Bio-Oss collagen in the buccal gap at immediate implants: A 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 1-8.
14. Emam H, Beheiri G, Elsalanty M, Sharawy M,. Microcomputed tomographic and histologic analysis of anorganic bone matrix coupled with cell-binding peptide suspended in sodium hyaluronate carrier after sinus augmentation: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 561-570.
15. Mould AP, Akiyama SK, Humphries MJ,. Regulation of integrin α5β1-fibronectin interactions by divalent cations. J Biol Chem 1995; 270: 26270-26277.
16. Zreiqat H, Howlett CR, Zannettino A, et al. Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 62: 175-184.
17. Ajroud K, Sugimori T, Goldmann WH, et al. Binding affinity of metal ions to the CD11b A-domain is regulated by integrin activation and ligands. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 25483-25488.
18. Sul YT, Johansson C, Byon ES, Albrektsson T,. The bone response of oxidized bioactive and non-bioactive titanium implants. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 6720-6730.
19. Sul YT, Kang BS, Johansson C, et al. The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009; 89: 942-950.
20. Cho LR, Kim DG, Kim JH, et al. Bone response to Mg ion-implanted clinical implants with the plasma source ion implantation method. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 848-856.
21. Park JW, Kim YJ, Jang JH, An CH,. In vitro biocompatibility of magnesium-incorporated submicro-porous titanium oxide surface produced by hydrothermal treatment. Appl Surf Sci 2010; 257: 925-931.
22. Park JW, Kim YJ, Jang JH, Song H,. Osteoblast response to magnesium ion-incorporated nanoporous titanium oxide surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 1278-1287.
23. Park JW, An CH, Jeong SH, Suh JY,. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: A histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02144.x.
24. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E,. Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite compared to calcium sulfate in the healing of human extraction sockets: Ragiographic and histomorphometric evaluation at 3 months. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 210-218.
25. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E,. Dental implants placed in extraction sites grafted with different bone substitutes: Radiographic evaluation at 24 months. J Periodontol 2009; 80: 1616-1621.
26. Crespi R, Cappare P, Gherlone E,. Osteotome sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implant placement in grafted biomaterial sockets: 3 years of follow-up. J Periodontol 2010; 81: 344-349.
27. Caneva M, Botticelli D, Stellini E, et al. Magnesium-enriched hydroxyapatite at immediate implants: A histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 512-517.
28. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, et al. Lateral ridge augmentation using particulated or block bone substitutes biocoated with rhGDF-5 and rhBMP-2: An immunohistochemical study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 642-652.
29. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, et al. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000; 21: 1803-1810.
30. Rouahi M, Gallet O, Champion E, et al. Influence of hydroxyapatite microstructure on human bone cell response. J Biomed Mater Res A 2006; 78: 222-235.
31. Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Ning F, et al. Synthesis and cellular biocompatibility of two kinds of HAP with different nanocrystal morphology. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007; 83: 121-126.
32. Khang D, Lu J, Yao C, et al. The role of nanometer and sub-micron surface features on vascular and bone cell adhesion on titanium. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 970-983.
33. Li B, Chen X, Guo B, et al. Fabrication and cellular biocompatibility of porous carbonated biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics with a nanostructure. Acta Biomater 2009; 5: 134-143.
34. Park JW, Kim HK, Kim YJ, et al. Osteoblast response and osseointegration of a Ti-6Al-4V alloy implant incorporating strontium. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 2843-2851.
35. Park JW, Kim ES, Jang JH, et al. Healing of rabbit calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate ceramics made of submicron-sized grains with a hierarchical pore structure. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 21: 268-276.
36. Park JW, Jang JH, Bae SR, et al. Bone formation with various bone graft substitutes in critical-sized rat calvarial defect. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010; 20: 372-378.
37. Bagambisa FB, Joos U, Schilli W,. Mechanisms and structure of the bond between bone and hydroxyapatite ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 1047-1055.
38. Handschel J, Wiesmann HP, Stratmann U, et al. TCP is hardly resorbed and not osteoconductive in a non-load bearing calvarial model. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1689-1695.
39. Bourgeois B, Laboux O, Obadia L, et al. Calcium-deficient apatite: A first in vivo study concerning bone ingrowth. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003; 65: 402-408.
40. Porter AE, Botelho CM, Lopes MA, et al. Ultrastructural comparison of dissolution and apatite precipitation on hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004; 69: 670-679.
41. Daculsi G, LeGeros RZ, Heughebaert M, Barbieux I,. Formation of carbonate-apatite crystals after implantation of calcium phosphate ceramics. Calcif Tissue Int 1990; 46: 20-27.
42. Daculsi G, Laboux O, Malard O, Weiss P,. Current state of the art of biphasic calcium phosphate bioceramics. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2003; 14: 195-200.