Synthesis and cellular biocompatibility of two kinds of HAP with different nanocrystal morphology

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 121-126

  Zhao, Yantao ^a   Zhang, Yumei ^a   Ning, Fang ^a   Guo, Dagang ^b   Xu, Zhixuan ^a  

^a FOURTH MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b XI'AN JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility hard tissue; Hydroxyapatite; in vitro; Microstructure; Nanomaterials nanophase

Indexed keywords

BIOASSAY; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL GROWTH; HYDROXYAPATITE; MICROSTRUCTURE; MORPHOLOGY; OSTEOBLASTS; PRECIPITATION (CHEMICAL);

CELLULAR BIOCOMPATIBILITY; MOLAR RATIOS; NANOCRYSTAL MORPHOLOGY; REACTANTS; SPHERICAL CRYSTALS;

NANOCRYSTALS;

HYDROXYAPATITE; NANOCRYSTAL;

ANIMAL CELL; AQUEOUS PRECIPITATION METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION RESPONSE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL; IMAGE ANALYSIS; NEWBORN; NITROBLUE TETRAZOLIUM TEST; NONHUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PRECIPITATION; RAT; REACTION ANALYSIS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SYNTHESIS;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SHAPE; CELLS, CULTURED; DURAPATITE; MATERIALS TESTING; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; NANOPARTICLES; OSTEOBLASTS; RATS;

EID: 34648828025     PISSN: 15524973     EISSN: 15524981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30774     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Rubin MA, Jasiuk I, Taylor J, Rubin J, Ganey T, Apkarian RP. TEM analysis of the nanostructure of normal and osteoporotic human trabecular bone. Bone 2003;33:270-282.
2. Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Specific proteins mediate enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;51:475-483.
3. Price RL, Ellison K, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;70:129-138.
4. Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, Tepper F, Webster TJ. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: Influence of chemistry, phase, and topography. J Biomed Mater Res A 2003;67:1284-1293.
5. Gutwein LG, Webster TJ. Osteoblast and chondrocyte proliferation in the presence of alumina and titania nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 2002;4:231-238.
6. Elias KE, Price RL, Webster TJ. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanometer diameter carbon fibers. Biomaterials 2000;23:3279-3287.
7. Kay S, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Nanostructured polymer/nanophase ceramic composites enhance osteoblast and chondrocyte adhesion. Tissue Eng 2002;8:753-761.
8. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Biios R. Design and evaluation of nanophase alumina for orthopaedic/dental applications. Nanostruct Mater 1999;12:983-986.
9. Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6Al4V, and CoCrMo. Biomaterials 2004;25:4731-4739.
10. Webster TJ, Schadler LS, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Mechanisms of enhanced osteoblast adhesion on nanophase alumina involve vitronectin. Tissue Eng 2001;7:291-301.
11. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Osteoblast adhesion on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 1999;20:1221-1227.
12. Webster TJ, Siegel RW, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biomaterials 2000;21:1803-1810.
13. Ejiofor JU, Webster TJ. Topography and morphology effects of titanium bone implant on osteoblasts adhesion in vitro. Presented at the 2003 International Conference on Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials, Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF), Las Vegas, NY, June 8-12, 2003.
14. Puleo DA, Holleran LA, Doremus RH, Bizios R. Osteoblast responses to orthopaedic implant materials in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:711-723.
15. Schwartz Z, Lohamann CH, Oefinger J, Bonewald LF, Dean DD, Boyan BD. Implant surface characteristics modulate differentiation behavior of cells in the osteoblastic lineage. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:38-48.
16. Washburn NR, Yamada LM, Simon CG, Kennedy SB, Amis EJ. High-throughput investigation of osteoblast response to polymer crystallinity: influence of nanometer-scale roughness on proliferation. Biomaterials 2004;25:1215-1224.
17. Raynaud S, Champion E, Bernache-Assollant D. Calcium phosphate apatites with variable Ca/P atomic ratio. II. Calcination and sintering. Biomaterials 2002;23:1073-1080.
18. Wan YQ, Wang Y, Liu ZM, Qu X, Han BX, Bei JZ, Wang SG. Adhesion and proliferation of OCT-1 osteoblast-like cells on micro- and nano-scale topography structured poly(L-lactide). Biomaterials 2005;26:4453-4459.
19. Gustafson T, Wolpert L. Studies on the cellular basis of morphogenesis in the Sea Urchin embryo: Directed movements of primary mesenchyme cells in normal and vegitated lavae. Exp Cell Res 1961;24:64-79.
20. Wood W, Martin P. Structures in focus - Filopodia. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2002;34:726-730.
21. Andersson AS, Olsson P, Lidberg U, Sutherland DS. Influence of nanoscale topography on the morphology of two epithelial cell types. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 2003;2:49-57.
22. Wilkinson CDW, Riehle M, Wood M, Gallagher J. The use of materials patterned on a nano- and micro-metric scale in cellular engineering. Mater Sci Eng C 2002;19:263-269.
23. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtiss ASG. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nano-columns produced by colloidal lithography. Biomaterials 2004;25:5415-5422.