Optimizing the osteogenicity of nanotopography using block co-polymer phase separation fabrication techniques

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1190-1197

  MacLaine, Sarah E ^a   Gadhari, Neha ^a   Pugin, Raphael ^b   Meek, Robert M Dominic ^c   Liley, Martha ^b   Dalby, Matthew J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b CSEM   (Switzerland)

^c SOUTHERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

human osteoblasts; nanotopography; osteogenic; polycaprolactone

Indexed keywords

ALIZARIN RED S; COPOLYMER; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOPONTIN; POLYCAPROLACTONE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR RUNX2;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; BIODEGRADATION; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CELL ADHESION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CYTOSKELETON; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; IMPLANT; NANOFABRICATION; NANOTOPOGRAPHY; ORTHOPEDICS; OSTEOBLAST; OSTEOGENICITY; PHASE SEPARATION; PLASTIC INDUSTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; STAINING; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERMOPLASTIC; THERMOPLASTICITY; TOPOGRAPHY;

CELL ADHESION; CORE BINDING FACTOR ALPHA 1 SUBUNIT; HUMANS; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; NANOSTRUCTURES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; OSTEOCALCIN; OSTEOGENESIS; OSTEOPONTIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 84862753850     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22076     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Langer R, Vacanti JP,. 1993. Tissue engineering. Science 260: 920-926.
2. Pountos I, Jones E, Tzioupis C, et al. 2006. Growing bone and cartilage. The role of mesenchymal stem cells. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 421-426.
3. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, et al. 2002. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A: 171-177.
4. Glass R, Arnold M, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, et al. 2004. Block copolymer micelle nanolithography on non-conductive substrates. New England Journal of Physics 6: 1367-2630.
5. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Tare R, et al. 2007. The control of human mesenchymal cell differentiation using nanoscale symmetry and disorder. Nat Mater 6: 997-1003.
6. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, et al. 2006. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126: 677-689.
7. McBeath R, Pirone DM, Nelson CM, et al. 2004. Cell shape, cytoskeletal tension, and rhoa regulate stem cell lineage commitment. Dev Cell 6: 483-495.
8. Kilian KA, Bugarija B, Lahn BT, et al. 2010. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 4872-4877.
9. Oh S, Brammer KS, Li YS, et al. 2009. Stem cell fate dictated solely by altered nanotube dimension. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 2130-2135.
10. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, McFarlane S, et al. 2008. Adhesion formation of primary human osteoblasts and the functional response of mesenchymal stem cells to 330nm deep microgrooves. J R Soc Interface 5: 1231-1242.
11. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, et al. 2002. In vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biomaterials 23: 2945-2954.
12. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, et al. 2009. The use of nanoscale topography to modulate the dynamics of adhesion formation in primary osteoblasts and erk/mapk signalling in stro-1+ enriched skeletal stem cells. Biomaterials 30: 5094-5103.
13. McNamara LE, McMurray RJ, Biggs MJ, et al. 2010. Nanotopographical control of stem cell differentiation. J Tissue Eng. PMID: 21350640[PubMed].
14. Vieu C, Carcenac F, Pépin A, et al. 2000. Electron beam lithography: resolution limits and applications. Appl Surface Sci 164: 111-117.
15. Anselme K, Linez P, Bigerelle M, et al. 2000. The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of tial6v4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour. Biomaterials 21: 1567-1577.
16. Gallagher JO, McGhee KF, Wilkinson CD, et al. 2002. Interaction of animal cells with ordered nanotopography. IEEE Trans Nanobiosci 1: 24-28.
17. Dalby MJ, Gadegaard N, Riehle MO, et al. 2004. Investigating filopodia sensing using arrays of defined nano-pits down to 35nm diameter in size. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36: 2005-2015.
18. Affrossman S, Jerome R, O'Neill SA, et al. 2000. Surface structure of thin film blends of polystyrene and poly(n-butyl methacrylate). Colloid Polym Sci 278: 993-999.
19. Affrossman S, Stamm M,. 2000. The effect of molecular weight an the topography of thin films of blends of poly(4-bromostyrene) and polystyrene. Colloid Polym Sci 278: 888-893.
20. Dalby MJ, Yarwood SJ, Riehle MO, et al. 2002. Increasing fibroblast response to materials using nanotopography: morphological and genetic measurements of cell response to 13-nm-high polymer demixed islands. Exp Cell Res 276: 1-9.
21. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, et al. 2006. Osteoprogenitor response to defined topographies with nanoscale depths. Biomaterials 27: 1306-1315.
22. Cheng JYCAR, Thomas EL, Smith HI, et al. 2002. Fabrication of nanostructures with long-range order using block copolymer lithography. Appl Phys Lett 81: 3657-3659.
23. Krishnamoorthy S, Pugin R, Brugger J, et al. 2006. Block copolymer micelles as switchable templates for nanofabrication. Langmuir 22: 3450-3452.
24. Krishnamoorthy S, Pugin R, Brugger J, et al. 2006. Tuning the dimensions and periodicities of nanostructures starting from the same polystyrene-block- poly(2-vinylpyridine) diblock copolymer. Adv Funct Mater 16: 1469-1475.
25. Dalby MJ, McCloy D, Robertson M, et al. 2006. Osteoprogenitor response to semi-ordered and random nanotopographies. Biomaterials 27: 2980-2987.
26. Sjostrom T, Dalby MJ, Hart A, et al. 2009. Fabrication of pillar-like titania nanostructures on titanium and their interactions with human skeletal stem cells. Acta Biomater 5: 1433-1441.
27. Kantawong F, Burgess KE, Jayawardena K, et al. 2009. Whole proteome analysis of osteoprogenitor differentiation induced by disordered nanotopography and mediated by erk signalling. Biomaterials 30: 4723-4731.
28. Dalby MJ, Giannaras D, Riehle MO, et al. 2004. Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27nm high polymer demixed nano-topography. Biomaterials 25: 77-83.
29. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, et al. 2007. Regulation of implant surface cell adhesion: characterization and quantification of s-phase primary osteoblast adhesions on biomimetic nanoscale substrates. J Orthop Res 25: 273-282.
30. Biggs MJ, Richards RG, Gadegaard N, et al. 2009. Interactions with nanoscale topography: adhesion quantification and signal transduction in cells of osteogenic and multipotent lineage. J Biomed Mater Res A 91: 195-208.
31. Stein GS, Lian JB,. 1993. Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. Endocr Rev 14: 424-442.
32. Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, et al. 2004. Investigating the limits of filopodial sensing: a brief report using sem to image the interaction between 10nm high nano-topography and fibroblast filopodia. Cell Biol Int 28: 229-236.
33. Kwan AP, Cummings CE, Chapman JA, et al. 1991. Macromolecular organization of chicken type x collagen in vitro. J Cell Biol 114: 597-604.
34. Stephens M, Kwan AP, Bayliss MT, et al. 1992. Human articular surface chondrocytes initiate alkaline phosphatase and type x collagen synthesis in suspension culture. J Cell Sci 103: 1111-1116.
35. Chu SZ, Inoue S, Wada K, et al. 2005. Self-organized nanoporous anodic titania films and ordered titania nanodots/nanorods on glass. Adv Funct Mater 15: 1343-1349.
36. Sjostrom T, Fox N, Su B,. 2009. Through-mask anodization of titania dot- and pillar-like nanostructures on bulk ti substrates using a nanoporous anodic alumina mask. Nanotechnology 20: 135305.