Comprehensive analysis of interactions between the src-associated protein in mitosis of 68 kDa and the human src-homology 3 proteome

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Asbach, Benedikt ^a   Ludwig, Christine ^a   Saksela, Kalle ^b   Wagner, Ralf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALANINE; PROLINE; PROTEIN SAM68; PROTEIN SH3;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; BINDING SITE; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MITOSIS; MUTATIONAL ANALYSIS; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHAGE DISPLAY; POINT MUTATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SH3 GENE;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ADAPTOR PROTEINS, VESICULAR TRANSPORT; BLOTTING, WESTERN; CELL LINE; DNA-BINDING PROTEINS; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; HUMANS; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEOME; RNA-BINDING PROTEINS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SORTING NEXINS; SRC HOMOLOGY DOMAINS;

EID: 84862705769     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038540     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Pawson T, (1995) Protein modules and signalling networks. Nature373: 573-580 doi:10.1038/373573a0.
2. Mayer BJ, (2001) SH3 domains: complexity in moderation. J Cell Sci 114: 1253-1263.
3. Cesareni G, Panni S, Nardelli G, Castagnoli L, (2002) Can we infer peptide recognition specificity mediated by SH3 domains? FEBS Lett 513: 38-44.
4. Jia CYH, Nie J, Wu C, Li C, Li SS-C, (2005) Novel Src Homology 3 Domain-binding Motifs Identified from Proteomic Screen of a Pro-rich Region. Mol Cell Proteomics 4: 1155-1166. doi pp. 10.1074/mcp.M500108-MCP200.
5. Lee CH, Leung B, Lemmon MA, Zheng J, Cowburn D, et al. (1995) A single amino acid in the SH3 domain of Hck determines its high affinity and specificity in binding to HIV-1 Nef protein. EMBO J 14: 5006-5015.
6. Lukong KE, Richard S, (2003) Sam68, the KH domain-containing superSTAR. Biochim Biophys Acta 1653: 73-86.
7. Lin Q, Taylor SJ, Shalloway D, (1997) Specificity and determinants of Sam68 RNA binding. Implications for the biological function of K homology domains. J Biol Chem 272: 27274-27280.
8. Jones AR, Schedl T, (1995) Mutations in gld-1, a female germ cell-specific tumor suppressor gene in Caenorhabditis elegans, affect a conserved domain also found in Src-associated protein Sam68. Genes Dev 9: 1491-1504.
9. Chen, Damaj BB, Herrera C, Lasko P, Richard S, (1997) Self-association of the single-KH-domain family members Sam68, GRP33, GLD-1, and Qk1: role of the KH domain. Mol Cell Biol 17: 5707-5718.
10. Meyer NH, Tripsianes K, Vincendeau M, Madl T, Kateb F, et al. (2010) Structural basis for homodimerization of the Src-associated during mitosis, 68-kDa protein (Sam68) Qua1 domain. J Biol Chem 285: 28893-28901doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.126185.
11. Taylor SJ, Shalloway D, (1994) An RNA-binding protein associated with Src through its SH2 and SH3 domains in mitosis.Nature 368: 867-871 doi:10.1038/368867a0.
12. Ishidate T, Yoshihara S, Kawasaki Y, Roy BC, Toyoshima K, et al. (1997) Identification of a novel nuclear localization signal in Sam68. FEBS Lett 409: 237-241.
13. Chen T, Boisvert FM, Bazett-Jones DP, Richard S, (1999) A role for the GSG domain in localizing Sam68 to novel nuclear structures in cancer cell lines. Mol Biol Cell 10: 3015-3033.
14. Rho J, Choi S, Jung C-R, Im D-S, (2007) Arginine methylation of Sam68 and SLM proteins negatively regulates their poly(U) RNA binding activity. Arch Biochem Biophys 466: 49-57 doi:10.1016/j.abb.2007.07.017.
15. Babic I, Jakymiw A, Fujita DJ, (2004) The RNA binding protein Sam68 is acetylated in tumor cell lines, and its acetylation correlates with enhanced RNA binding activity. Oncogene 23: 3781-3789 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207484.
16. Lang V, Mège D, Semichon M, Gary-Gouy H, Bismuth G, (1997) A dual participation of ZAP-70 and scr protein tyrosine kinases is required for TCR-induced tyrosine phosphorylation of Sam68 in Jurkat T cells. Eur J Immunol 27: 3360-3367.
17. Gilbert C, Barabé F, Rollet-Labelle E, Bourgoin SG, McColl SR, et al. (2001) Evidence for a role for SAM68 in the responses of human neutrophils to ligation of CD32 and to monosodium urate crystals. J Immunol 166: 4664-4671.
18. Sanchez-Margalet V, Martin-Romero C, (2001) Human leptin signaling in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells: activation of the JAK-STAT pathway. Cell Immunol 211: 30-36 doi:10.1006/cimm.2001.1815.
19. Sánchez-Margalet V, Najib S, (1999) p68 Sam is a substrate of the insulin receptor and associates with the SH2 domains of p85 PI3K. FEBS Lett 455: 307-310.
20. Barlat I, Maurier F, Duchesne M, Guitard E, Tocque B, et al. (1997) A role for Sam68 in cell cycle progression antagonized by a spliced variant within the KH domain. J Biol Chem 272: 3129-3132.
21. Taylor SJ, Anafi M, Pawson T, Shalloway D, (1995) Functional interaction between c-Src and its mitotic target, Sam 68. J Biol Chem 270: 10120-10124.
22. Babic I, Cherry E, Fujita DJ, (2006) SUMO modification of Sam68 enhances its ability to repress cyclin D1 expression and inhibits its ability to induce apoptosis. Oncogene 25: 4955-4964 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1209504.
23. Li Q-H, Haga I, Shimizu T, Itoh M, Kurosaki T, et al. (2002) Retardation of the G2-M phase progression on gene disruption of RNA binding protein Sam68 in the DT40 cell line. FEBS Lett 525: 145-150.
24. Liu K, Li L, Nisson PE, Gruber C, Jessee J, et al. (2000) Neoplastic transformation and tumorigenesis associated with sam68 protein deficiency in cultured murine fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 275: 40195-40201 doi:10.1074/jbc.M006194200.
25. Busà R, Paronetto MP, Farini D, Pierantozzi E, Botti F, et al. (2007) The RNA-binding protein Sam68 contributes to proliferation and survival of human prostate cancer cells. Oncogene 26: 4372-4382 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210224.
26. Sette C, Messina V, Paronetto MP, (2010) Sam68: a new STAR in the male fertility firmament.J Androl 31: 66-74 doi:10.2164/jandrol.109.008136.
27. Paronetto MP, Messina V, Bianchi E, Barchi M, Vogel G, et al. (2009) Sam68 regulates translation of target mRNAs in male germ cells, necessary for mouse spermatogenesis. J Cell Biol 185: 235-249 doi:10.1083/jcb.200811138.
28. Richard S, Torabi N, Franco GV, Tremblay GA, Chen T, et al. (2005) Ablation of the Sam68 RNA binding protein protects mice from age-related bone loss. PLoS Genet 1: e74 doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.0010074.
29. Lukong KE, Richard S, (2008) Motor coordination defects in mice deficient for the Sam68 RNA-binding protein. Behav Brain Res 189: 357-363 doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.01.010.
30. Matter N, Herrlich P, König H, (2002) Signal-dependent regulation of splicing via phosphorylation of Sam68. Nature 420: 691-695 doi:10.1038/nature01153.
31. Kärkkäinen S, Hiipakka M, Wang J-H, Kleino I, Vähä-Jaakkola M, et al. (2006) Identification of preferred protein interactions by phage-display of the human Src homology-3 proteome. EMBO Rep 7: 186-191 doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7400596.
32. Graham FL, van der Eb AJ, (1973) A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA. Virology 52: 456-467.
33. Harada S, Koyanagi Y, Yamamoto N, (1985) Infection of HTLV-III/LAV in HTLV-I-carrying cells MT-2 and MT-4 and application in a plaque assay. Science 229: 563-566.
34. He L, Olson DP, Wu X, Karpova TS, McNally JG, et al. (2003) A flow cytometric method to detect protein-protein interaction in living cells by directly visualizing donor fluorophore quenching during CFP-&YFP fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). Cytometry A 55: 71-85 doi:10.1002/cyto.a.10073.
35. Espejo A, Côté J, Bednarek A, Richard S, Bedford MT, (2002) A protein-domain microarray identifies novel protein-protein interactions. Biochem J 367: 697-702 doi:10.1042/BJ20020860.
36. Asbach B, Kolb M, Liss M, Wagner R, Schäferling M, (2010) Protein microarray assay for the screening of SH3 domain interactions. Anal Bioanal Chem 398: 1937-1946. doi:10.1007/s00216-010-4202-x.
37. Richard S, Yu D, Blumer KJ, Hausladen D, Olszowy MW, et al. (1995) Association of p62, a multifunctional SH2- and SH3-domain-binding protein, with src family tyrosine kinases, Grb2, and phospholipase C gamma-1. Mol Cell Biol 15: 186-197.
38. Lawe DC, Hahn C, Wong AJ, (1997) The Nck SH2/SH3 adaptor protein is present in the nucleus and associates with the nuclear protein SAM68. Oncogene 14: 223-231 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1200821.
39. Kesti T, Ruppelt A, Wang J-H, Liss M, Wagner R, et al. (2007) Reciprocal regulation of SH3 and SH2 domain binding via tyrosine phosphorylation of a common site in CD3epsilon. J Immunol 179: 878-885.
40. Cole C, Barber JD, Barton GJ, (2008) The Jpred 3 secondary structure prediction server. Nucleic Acids Res 36: W197-201 doi:10.1093/nar/gkn238.
41. Dosztányi Z, Csizmok V, Tompa P, Simon I, (2005) IUPred: web server for the prediction of intrinsically unstructured regions of proteins based on estimated energy content. Bioinformatics 21: 3433-3434 doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bti541.
42. Cortese MS, Uversky VN, Dunker AK, (2008) Intrinsic disorder in scaffold proteins: getting more from less. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 98: 85-106 doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2008.05.007.
43. Buday L, (1999) Membrane-targeting of signalling molecules by SH2/SH3 domain-containing adaptor proteins. Biochim Biophys Acta 1422: 187-204.
44. Najib S, Sánchez-Margalet V, (2002) Sam68 associates with the SH3 domains of Grb2 recruiting GAP to the Grb2-SOS complex in insulin receptor signaling. J Cell Biochem 86: 99-106 doi:10.1002/jcb.10198.
45. Lukong KE, Larocque D, Tyner AL, Richard S, (2005) Tyrosine phosphorylation of sam68 by breast tumor kinase regulates intranuclear localization and cell cycle progression. J Biol Chem 280: 38639-38647 doi:10.1074/jbc.M505802200.
46. Zarrinpar A, Bhattacharyya RP, Lim WA, (2003) The structure and function of proline recognition domains. Sci STKE 2003: RE8 doi:10.1126/stke.2003.179.re8.
47. Bedford MT, Frankel A, Yaffe MB, Clarke S, Leder P, et al. (2000) Arginine methylation inhibits the binding of proline-rich ligands to Src homology 3, but not WW, domains. J Biol Chem 275: 16030-16036 doi:10.1074/jbc.M909368199.
48. Wunderlich L, Gohér A, Faragó A, Downward J, Buday L, (1999) Requirement of multiple SH3 domains of Nck for ligand binding. Cell Signal 11: 253-262.
49. di Marzo Veronese F, Willis AE, Boyer-Thompson C, Appella E, Perham RN, (1994) Structural mimicry and enhanced immunogenicity of peptide epitopes displayed on filamentous bacteriophage. The V3 loop of HIV-1 gp120. J Mol Biol 243: 167-172 doi:10.1006/jmbi.1994.1643.
50. Kang AS, Barbas CF, Janda KD, Benkovic SJ, Lerner RA, (1991) Linkage of recognition and replication functions by assembling combinatorial antibody Fab libraries along phage surfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 4363-4366.
51. Li SS-C, (2005) Specificity and versatility of SH3 and other proline-recognition domains: structural basis and implications for cellular signal transduction. Biochem J 390: 641-653 doi:10.1042/BJ20050411.
52. Landgraf C, Panni S, Montecchi-Palazzi L, Castagnoli L, Schneider-Mergener J, et al. (2004) Protein interaction networks by proteome peptide scanning. PLoS Biol 2: E14 doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020014.
53. Mammen M, Choi S-K, Whitesides GM, (1998) Polyvalent Interactions in Biological Systems: Implications for Design and Use of Multivalent Ligands and Inhibitors. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 37: 2754-2794. doi:10.1002/ (SICI)1521-3773(19981102)37:20,2754::AID-ANIE2754.3.0.CO;2-3.
54. Pucharcos C, Casas C, Nadal M, Estivill X, de la Luna S, (2001) The human intersectin genes and their spliced variants are differentially expressed. Biochim Biophys Acta 1521: 1-11.
55. Buchse T, Horras N, Lenfert E, Krystal G, Korbel S, et al. (2011) CIN85 interacting proteins in B cells- specific role for SHIP-1. Mol Cell Proteomics doi:10.1074/mcp.M110.006239.
56. Kim Y, Chang S, (2006) Ever-expanding network of dynamin-interacting proteins. Mol Neurobiol 34: 129-136. doi:10.1385/MN:34 2: 129.
57. Guiet R, Poincloux R, Castandet J, Marois L, Labrousse A, et al. (2008) Hematopoietic cell kinase (Hck) isoforms and phagocyte duties- from signaling and actin reorganization to migration and phagocytosis. Eur J Cell Biol 87: 527-542 doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2008.03.008.
58. O'Bryan JP, Mohney RP, Oldham CE, (2001) Mitogenesis and endocytosis: What's at the INTERSECTIoN? Oncogene 20: 6300-6308 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1204773.
59. Reddy S, Devlin R, Menaa C, Nishimura R, Choi SJ, et al. (1998) Isolation and characterization of a cDNA clone encoding a novel peptide (OSF) that enhances osteoclast formation and bone resorption. J Cell Physiol 177: 636-645. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199812)177:4,636::AID-JCP14.3.0.CO;2-H.
60. Soriano P, Montgomery C, Geske R, Bradley A, (1991) Targeted disruption of the c-src proto-oncogene leads to osteopetrosis in mice. Cell 64: 693-702.
61. Zeke A, Lukács M, Lim WA, Reményi A, (2009) Scaffolds: interaction platforms for cellular signalling circuits. Trends Cell Biol 19: 364-374 doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.05.007.
62. Derry JJ, Richard S, Valderrama Carvajal H, Ye X, Vasioukhin V, et al. (2000) Sik (BRK) phosphorylates Sam68 in the nucleus and negatively regulates its RNA binding ability. Mol Cell Biol 20: 6114-6126.
63. Qiu H, Miller WT, (2004) Role of the Brk SH3 domain in substrate recognition. Oncogene 23: 2216-2223 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1207339.
64. Finan PM, Hall A, Kellie S, (1996) Sam68 from an immortalised B-cell line associates with a subset of SH3 domains. FEBS Lett 389: 141-144.
65. Fumagalli S, Totty NF, Hsuan JJ, Courtneidge SA, (1994) A target for Src in mitosis. Nature 368: 871-874 doi:10.1038/368871a0.
66. Weng Z, Thomas SM, Rickles RJ, Taylor JA, Brauer AW, et al. (1994) Identification of Src, Fyn, and Lyn SH3-binding proteins: implications for a function of SH3 domains. Mol Cell Biol 14: 4509-4521.
67. Bunnell SC, Henry PA, Kolluri R, Kirchhausen T, Rickles RJ, et al. (1996) Identification of Itk/Tsk Src homology 3 domain ligands. J Biol Chem 271: 25646-25656.
68. Oneyama C, Agatsuma T, Kanda Y, Nakano H, Sharma SV, et al. (2003) Synthetic inhibitors of proline-rich ligand-mediated protein-protein interaction: potent analogs of UCS15A. Chem Biol 10: 443-451.
69. Hassaïne G, Courcoul M, Bessou G, Barthalay Y, Picard C, et al. (2001) The Tyrosine Kinase Hck Is an Inhibitor of HIV-1 Replication Counteracted by the Viral Vif Protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276: 16885-16893 doi:10.1074/jbc.M009076200.
70. Vogel LB, Fujita DJ, (1995) p70 phosphorylation and binding to p56lck is an early event in interleukin-2-induced onset of cell cycle progression in T-lymphocytes. J Biol Chem 270: 2506-2511.
71. Tran T, Hoffmann S, Wiesehan K, Jonas E, Luge C, et al. (2005) Insights into human Lck SH3 domain binding specificity: different binding modes of artificial and native ligands. Biochemistry 44: 15042-15052 doi:10.1021/bi051403k.
72. Shen Z, Batzer A, Koehler JA, Polakis P, Schlessinger J, et al. (1999) Evidence for SH3 domain directed binding and phosphorylation of Sam68 by Src. Oncogene 18: 4647-4653 doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1203079.
73. Guinamard R, Fougereau M, Seckinger P, (1997) The SH3 domain of Bruton's tyrosine kinase interacts with Vav, Sam68 and EWS. Scand J Immunol 45: 587-595.
74. Trüb T, Frantz JD, Miyazaki M, Band H, Shoelson SE, (1997) The role of a lymphoid-restricted, Grb2-like SH3-SH2-SH3 protein in T cell receptor signaling. J Biol Chem 272: 894-902.
75. Andreotti AH, Bunnell SC, Feng S, Berg LJ, Schreiber SL, (1997) Regulatory intramolecular association in a tyrosine kinase of the Tec family. Nature 385: 93-97 doi:10.1038/385093a0.
76. Lazer G, Pe'er L, Schapira V, Richard S, Katzav S, (2007) The association of Sam68 with Vav1 contributes to tumorigenesis. Cell Signal 19: 2479-2486 doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.07.022.