Legitimacy in global governance: International, transnational and private institutions compared

Swiss Political Science Review

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 220-248

  Take, Ingo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Environmental Standards; Global Governance; Internet Regulation; Legitimacy; Social Standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84862688293     PISSN: 14247755     EISSN: 16626370     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1662-6370.2012.02064.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Abbott, K., Keohane R., Moravcsik A., Slaughter A., and, Snidal D., (2000). The Concept of Legalization. International Organization 54 (3): 401-419.
2. Abromeit, H., 2002, Wozu braucht man Demokratie? Die postnationale Herausforderung der Demokratietheorie. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
3. Arts, B., and, Kerwer D., (2007). Beyond Legalization? How Global Standards Work. In, Lehmkuhl, D., and, Christian B., (eds.), Law and Legalization in Transnational Relations. London: Routledge (144-165).
4. Beetham, D., 1991, The Legitimation of Power. Houndmills: Palgrave.
5. Benz, A., and, Papadopoulos Y., 2006, Governance and Democracy. Comparing national, European and international experiences. London and New York: Routledge.
6. Bernstein, S., (2011). Legitimacy in Intergovernmental and Non-State Global Governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 17-51.
7. Bernstein, S., and, Cashore B., (2004). Non-State Global Governance: Is Forest Certification a Legitimate Alternative to a Global Forest Convention? In, Kirton, J., and, Trevilcock M., (eds.), Hard Choices, Soft Law: Combining Trade, Environment, and Social Cohesion in Global Governance. London: Ashgate Press (33-64).
8. Betz, J., (2000). Kinderarbeit in Entwicklungsländern. Das Beispiel indischer Teppichsektor. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B 17-18/2000: 21-29.
9. Bexell, M., Tallberg J., and, Uhlin A., (2010). Democracy in Global Governance: The Promises and Pitfalls of Transnational Actors. Global Governance 16 (2010): 81-101.
10. BMZ 2003, Report on the Evaluation of Rugmark and Care & Fair. Bonn: BMZ.
11. Brassett, J., and, Tsingou E., (2011). The politics of legitimate global governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 1-16.
12. Buchanan, A., and, Keohnae R. O., (2006). The Legitimacy of Global Governance Institutions. Ethics & International Affairs 20 (4): 405-437.
13. Chayes, A., and, Handler Chayes A., 1995, The New Sovereignty. Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.
14. Cerutti, F., (2011). The deeper roots of legitimacy and its future. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 121-130.
15. Chango, M., (2011). Accountability in private global governance: ICANN and civil society. In, Scholte, J. A., (ed.). Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press (267-288).
16. Clark, I., (2007). Legitimacy in International or World Society. In, Hurrelmann, A., Schneider S., and, Steffek J., (eds), Legitimacy in an Age of Global Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan (193-210).
17. Cohen, J., and, Sabel C., (1997). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal 3 (4): 313-342.
18. Cutler, C., Haufler V., and, Porter T, (1999). Private Authority and International Affairs. In, Cutler, C., Haufler V., and, Porter T., (eds.), Private Authority and International Affairs. Albany: State University of New York Press (3-28).
19. Cutler, C. A., (2010). The legitimacy of private transnational governance: experts and the transnational market for force. Socio-Economic Review 8 (1): 157-185.
20. Dany, C., (2008). Civil Society Participation under Most Favourable Conditions: Assessing the Deliberative Quality of the WSIS. In, Steffek, J., Kissling C., and, Nanz P., (eds.), Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Houndmills Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan (53-70).
21. Dingwerth, K., (2008). North-South Parity in Global Governance: The Affirmative Procedures of the Forest Stewardship Council. Global Governance 14 (1): 53-71.
22. Drake, W., (2004). Reframing Internet Governance Discourse: Fifteen Baseline Propositions. In, MacLean, D., (ed.), Internet Governance: A Grand Collaboration. New York: United Nations ICT Task Force Global Forum on Internet Governance (122-161).
23. Drezner, D., (2004). The Global Governance of the Internet: Bringing the State Back In. Political Science Quarterly 119 (3): 477-498. (Pubitemid 39518764)
24. FERN 2001, Behind the Logo: An Environmental and Social Assessment of Forest Certification Schemes. Moreton-in-Marsh: FERN.
25. Franck, T., 1990, The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Froomkin, M., (2000). Wrong Turn in Cyberspace: Using ICANN to Route Around the APA and the Constitution. Duke Law Journal 50 (17): 17-184.
27. Haufler, V., (2002). Negotiating International Standards for Environmental Management Systems: The ISO 14000 Standards.
28. Hofmann, J., (2006). (Trans-)Formations of Civil Society in Global Governance Contexts-Two Case Studies on the Problem of Self-Organization. In, Schuppert, G., (ed.), Global Governance and the Role of Non-State Actors. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft (179-202).
29. Hurd, I., 2007, After Anarchy. Legitimacy & Power in the United Nations Security Council. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
30. IPEC (International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour) 2006, IPEC action against child labour. 2004-2005: Progress and future priorities. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
31. Jachtenfuchs, M., and, Kohler-Koch B., (2004). Governance in der Europäischen Union. In, Benz, A., (ed.), Governance-Regieren in komplexen Regelsystemen. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag (77-101).
32. Keohane, R. O., (2011). Global governance and legitimacy. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 99-109.
33. Keohane, R., Moravcsik A., and, Slaughter A., (2000). Legalized Dispute Resolution: Interstate and Transnational. International Organization 54 (3): 457-488.
34. Kissling, C., and, Steffek J., (2008). CSOs and the Democratization of International Governance: Prospects and Problems. In, Steffek, J, Kissling C., and, Nanz P., (eds.), Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan (208-218).
35. Kratochwil, F., (2006). On Legitimacy. International Relations 20 (3): 302-308.
36. Lowi, T., (1972). Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice. Public Administrative Review 32 (4): 298-310.
37. Majone, G., (1998). Europe's 'Democratic Deficit': The Question of Standards. European Law Journal 4 (1): 5-28.
38. Mason, M., 2005, The New Accountability: Environmental Responsibility Across Borders. London: Earthscan.
39. Meidinger, E., (2008). Competitive Supra-Governmental Regulation: How Could It Be Democratic? Chicago Journal of International Law 8 (2): 513-534.
40. Mitchell, R., (1996). Compliance Theory: An Overview. In, Cameron, J., Werksman J., and, Roderick P., (eds.), Improving Compliance with International Environmental Law. London: Earthscan Publ. (3-28).
41. Moravcsik, A., (2004). Is there a "Democratic Deficit" in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 336-363.
42. Mügge, D., (2011). Limits of Legitimacy and the primacy of politics in financial governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 52-74.
43. Murphy, C., and, Yates J., 2009, The International Organization of Standardization (ISO). Global governance through voluntary consensus. London/New York: Routledge.
44. Neyer, J., 2004, Postnationale politische Herrschaft. Vergesellschaftung und Verrechtlichung jenseits des Staates. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
45. One World Trust 2007, 2007 Global Accountability Report. London: One World Trust.
46. O'Siochrú, S., (2004). Civil Society Participation in the WSIS Process: Promises and Reality, Continuum. Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 18 (3): 330-344.
47. Reinicke, W., and, Deng F., 2000, Critical Choices. The United Nations, Networks, and the Future of Global Governance. Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.
48. Saward, M., (1994). Democratic Theory and Indices of Democratization. In, Beetham, D., (ed.), Defining and measuring democracy. London: Sage Publ. (6-24).
49. Scharpf, F., 1999, Regieren in Europa. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.
50. Schmidt, H., and, Take I., (2000). Democratization without Representation. In, Albert, M., Brock L., and, Wolf K., (eds.), Civilizing World Politics. Society and Community Beyond the State. Lanham et al.: Rowman & Littlefield (169-178).
51. Schmitter, P., (2002). Participation in Governance Arrangements: Is there any Reason to Expect it will Achieve "Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multilevel Context"? In, Grote, J., and, Gbikpi B., (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications. Opladen: Leske + Budrich (51-69).
52. Scholte, J. A., 2011a, Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press.
53. Scholte, J. A., (2011b). Towards greater legitimacy in global governance. Review of International Political Economy 18 (1): 110-120.
54. Social Accountability International 2008, SA 8000. New York: SAI.
55. Steffek, J., Kissling C., and, Nanz P., (2008), (eds). Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
56. Steffek, J., and, Nanz P., (2008). Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance. In, Steffek, J., Kissling C., and, Nanz P., (eds.), Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance. A Cure for the Democratic Deficit? Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan (1-29).
57. Suchman, M., (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20 (3): 571-610.
58. Take, I., 2002, NGOs im Wandel. Von der Graswurzel auf das diplomatische Parkett. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
59. Take, I., (2009), (ed.). Legitimes Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Unterschiedliche Formen von Global Governance im Vergleich. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
60. Ullrich, H., (2011). Civil Society and the World Fair Trade Organization: developing responsive accountability. In, Scholte, J. A., (ed.), Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge et al.: Cambridge University Press (289-305).
61. Underdal, A., (1998). Explaining Compliance and Defection. European Journal of International Relations 4 (1): 5-30.
62. Walker, J. W., and, Thompson A., (2008), (eds.). Critical Mass. The Emergence of Global Civil Society. Waterloo, Canada: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
63. Wolf, K., (2002). Contextualizing Normative Standards for Legitimate Governance beyond the State. In, Gbikpi, B., and, Grote J., (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Social Implications. Opladen: Leske + Budrich (35-50).
64. Zürn, M., (2000). Democratic Governance beyond the Nation-State. In, Greven, M., and, Pauly L., (eds.), Democracy Beyond the State? The European Dilemma and the Emerging Global Order. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield (91-114).
65. Zürn, M., (2004). Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems. Government and Opposition 39 (2): 260-287.
66. Zürn, M., (2005). Introduction: Law and compliance at different levels., Zürn, M., and, Joerges C., (eds.), Law and Governance in Postnational Europe. Compliance beyond the Nation-State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1-39).