Quantifying discrimination of Framingham risk functions with different survival C statistics

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 31, Issue 15, 2012, Pages 1543-1553

  Pencina, Michael J ^a,b,c   D'Agostino, Ralph B ^b   Song, Linye ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c HARVARD CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

AUC; Censoring; Concordance; Discrimination; Risk function

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AWARENESS; EVENT FREE SURVIVAL; FRAMINGHAM RISK SCORE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODEL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SURVIVAL RATE; SURVIVAL TIME;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; COHORT STUDIES; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MALE; PROGNOSIS; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROC CURVE; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84862674890     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.4508     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. D'Agostino RB, Kannel WB.Epidemiological background and design: The Framingham Study. In Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Sesquicentennial Invited Paper Sessions, American Statistical Association: Alexandria, VA, 1989.
2. Dawber TR, Meadors GF, Moore Jr. FE.Epidemiological approaches to heart disease: the Framingham Study. American Journal of Public Health 1951; 41(3):279-81.
3. Kannel WB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Garrison RJ, Castelli WP.An investigation of coronary heart disease in families. The Framingham offspring study. American Journal of Epidemiology 1979; 110(3):281-90.
4. Cupples LA, D'Agostino RB.Some risk factors related to the annual incidence of cardiovascular disease and death in pooled repeated biennial measurements. Framingham Heart Study, 30 year follow-up. In The Framingham Study. An epidemiological investigation of cardiovascular disease, Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Garrison RJ (eds), Section 34, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute: Bethesda, MD, 1987.
5. Gordon T, Kannel WB.Multiple risk functions for predicting coronary heart disease: the concept, accuracy, and application. American Heart Journal 1982; 103:1031-1039.
6. Anderson KM, Odell PM, Wilson PWF, Kannel WB.Cardiovascular Risk Profile. American Heart Journal 1991; 121:293-298.
7. Wilson P, D'Agostino R, Levy D, et al.Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998; 97:1837-1847.
8. Executive Summary of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Cholesterol in Adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). Journal of the American Medical Association 2001; 285:2486-2497.
9. D'Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, Wolf PA, Cobain MR, Massaro JM, Kannel WB.General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care. Circulation 2008; 117:743-753.
10. Cox DR.Regression Models and Life Tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B 1972; 34:187-220.
11. Korn E, Simon R.Measures of explained variation for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 1990; 9:487-503.
12. Schemper M.The explained variation in proportional hazards regression. Biometrika 1990; 77(1):202-204.
13. Kent JT, O'Quigley J.Measures of dependence for censored survival data. Biometrika 1988; 75(3):525-534.
14. Huang Y, Pepe MS, Feng Z.Evaluating the Predictiveness of a Continuous Marker. Biometrics 2007; 63(4):1181-1188.
15. Graf E, Schmoor C, Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M.Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data. Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18:2529-2545.
16. Royston P, Sauerbrei W.A new measure of prognostic separation in survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23:723-748.
17. D'Agostino RB, Griffith JL, Schmidt CH, Terrin N.Measures for evaluating model performance. In Proceedings of the biometrics section, American Statistical Association, Biometrics Section: Alexandria VA, 1997; 253-258.
18. Bamber D.The area above the ordinal dominance graph and the area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 1975; 12:387-415.
19. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ.The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143:29-36.
20. Nam BH, D'Agostino RB.Discrimination index, the area under the ROC curve. In Goodness-of-Fit Tests and Model Validity, Birkhauser: Boston, 2002. Chapter 20.
21. Zhou XH, McClish DK, Obuchowski NA.Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. Wiley: New York, 2002.
22. Harrell FE, Califf RM, Pryor DB, Lee KL, Rosati RA.Evaluating the yield of medical tests. Journal of the American Medical Association 1982; 247:2543-2546.
23. Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark DB.Tutorial in Biostatistics: Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Statistics in Medicine 1996; 15:361-387.
24. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino RB.Overall C as a measure of discrimination in survival analysis: model specific population value and confidence interval estimation. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23:2109-2123.
25. Heagerty PJ, Zheng Y.Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves. Biometrics 2005; 61:92-105.
26. Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D'Agostino R, Wei LJ.On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30:1105-1117.
27. Chambless LE, Diao G.Estimation of time-dependent area under the ROC curve for long-term risk prediction. Statistics in Medicine 2006; 25:3474-3486.
28. Gönen M, Heller G.Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazards regression. Biometrika 2005; 92(4):965-970.
29. Pencina MJ, D'Agostino Sr. RB, D'Agostino Jr. RB, Vasan RS.Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond. Statistics in Medicine 2008; 27:157-72.
30. Cheng Sc, Wei LJ, Ying Z.Analysis of transformation models with censored data. Biometrika 1995; 82:835-845.
31. SAS Institute Inc.SAS/STAT®;9.2 User's Guide. SAS Institute Inc. (proc phreg): Cary NC, 2008.