Electromechanical properties of graphene drumheads

Science

Volumn 336, Issue 6088, 2012, Pages 1557-1561

  Klimov, Nikolai N ^a,b   Jung, Suyong ^a,b,d   Zhu, Shuze ^c   Li, Teng ^b,c   Wright, C Alan ^c   Solares, Santiago D ^b,c   Newell, David B ^a   Zhitenev, Nikolai B ^a   Stroscio, Joseph A ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^d Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GRAPHENE; QUANTUM DOT;

CARBON; ELECTRODE; MEMBRANE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PROBE; QUANTUM MECHANICS; SCANNING TUNNELLING MICROSCOPY;

ARTICLE; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTRODE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING TUNNELING MICROSCOPY; SCANNING TUNNELING SPECTROSCOPY; SIMULATION; SPECTROSCOPY;

EID: 84862626660     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.1220335     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. K. S. Novoselov et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 10451 (2005).
2. K. I. Bolotin et al., Solid State Commun. 146, 351 (2008).
3. M. M. Fogler, F. Guinea, M. I. Katsnelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226804 (2008).
4. F. Guinea, M. I. Katsnelson, A. K. Geim, Nat. Phys. 6, 30 (2010).
5. N. Levy et al., Science 329, 544 (2010).
6. K.-J. Kim, Y. M. Blanter, K.-H. Ahn, Phys. Rev. B 84, 081401 (2011).
7. G. M. M. Wakker, R. P. Tiwari, M. Blaauboer, Phys. Rev. B 84, 195427 (2011).
8. F. Guinea, B. Horovitz, P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. B 77, 205421 (2008).
9. F. Guinea, A. K. Geim, M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, Phys. Rev. B 81, 035408 (2010).
10. T. O. Wehling, A. V. Balatsky, A. M. Tsvelik, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, Europhys. Lett. 84, 17003 (2008).
11. M. Gibertini, A. Tomadin, M. Polini, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125437 (2010).
12. S. Jung et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 245 (2011).
13. A. Luican, G. Li, E. Y. Andrei, Phys. Rev. B 83, 041405 (2011).
14. J. A. Stroscio, E. W. Hudson, S. R. Blankenship, R. J. Celotta, A. P. Fein, Proc. SPIE 4608, 112 (2002).
15. G. M. Rutter et al., Nat. Phys. 7, 649 (2011).
16. D. L. Miller et al., Science 324, 924 (2009).
17. G. Li, A. Luican, E. Y. Andrei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 176804 (2009).
18. Additional supplementary text and data are available on Science Online.
19. B. J. LeRoy, J. Kong, V. K. Pahilwani, C. Dekker, S. G. Lemay, Phys. Rev. B 72, 075413 (2005).
20. L. P. Kouwenhoven, D. G. Austing, S. Tarucha, Rep. Prog. Phys. 64, 701 (2001).
21. We determined the 1 SD error estimates in the QD sizes by combining the 1 SD in the addition energy variation for the first and last set of energies in Fig. 3G, together with the 1 SD uncertainties in the measured slopes of the charging lines in the gate maps.
22. M. I. Katsnelson, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, Nat. Phys. 2, 620 (2006).
23. J. Güttinger et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 046810 (2009).