Modelling iteration in engineering design

Proceedings of ICED 2007, the 16th International Conference on Engineering Design

Volumn DS 42, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Wynn, David C ^a   Eckert, Claudia M ^a   Clarkson, P John ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Design iteration; Design process modelling; Design process simulation

Indexed keywords

DESIGN ITERATION; DESIGN PROCESS; DESIGN STRUCTURE MATRICES; DOMAIN SPECIFIC; ENGINEERING DESIGN; IN-PROCESS; MODELLING FRAMEWORK; NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

PRODUCT DESIGN; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

COMPUTER SIMULATION;

EID: 84862625882     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Eckert, C. M. and Clarkson, P. J., The Reality Of Design Process Planning. ICED'03, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003.
2. Wynn D. C. and Clarkson P. J., Models of Designing, in Design Process Improvement: A Review Of Current Practice. Clarkson and Eckert (eds.) Springer 2005.
3. Ottosson, S., Dynamic Product Development: Findings from Participating Action Research in a Fast New Product Development Process, Journal of Engineering Design, 7(2), pp. 151-170, 1996.
4. Brown, R. and Widell, R., Managing Business Processes Through Collaborative Workflow Systems. Proceedings of the TMCE 2006, April 18-22, 2006, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
5. Safoutin, M. J., A Methodology for Empirical Measurement of Iteration in Engineering Design Processes, PhD thesis, University of Washington, USA, 2003.
6. Costa, R. and Sobek, D. K., II, Iteration in Engineering Design: Inherent and Unavoidable or Product Choices Made? Proceedings of DETC'03 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Chicago, Illinois, USA, September 2-6, 2003.
7. Browning, T. R., Modeling and Analyzing Cost, Schedule, and Performance in Complex System Product Development, PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, 1998.
8. Costa, R., Productive Iteration in Student Engineering Design Projects, MSc thesis, Montana State University, USA, July 2004.
9. Lawson, B., How designers think, The Architectural Press Ltd., London, 1980.
10. Evans J.H., Basic Design Concepts. American Society of Naval Engineers Journal, 71(4), pp. 671-678, 1959.
11. Eppinger, S., Whitney, D., Smith, R. and Gebala, D., A Model-Based Method for Organizing Tasks in Product Development, Research in Engineering Design, 6, pp. 1-13, 1994.
12. Flanagan, T. L., Supporting Design Planning Through Process Model Simulation, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2006.
13. Wynn D.C., Eckert C.M. and Clarkson P.J. Applied Signposting: A Modeling Framework to Support Design Process Improvement, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September 10-13, 2006.
14. Jarratt, T. A., Model-based Approach to Support the Management of Engineering Change, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, UK, 2004.
15. Wynn, D. C., Model-Based Approaches to Support Process Improvement in Complex Product Development, PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, submitted February 2007
16. Wartofsky, M. W., Models: Representation and Scientific Understanding, Boston studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 129. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1979.
17. Edmonds, B., Syntactic Measures of Complexity, PhD thesis, University of Manchester, UK, 1999.
18. Checkland, P., Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, J. Wiley, 1981.
19. Ayton, P. and Pascoe, E., Bias in Human Judgement Under Uncertainty, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1995.
20. Chalupnik, M. J., Wynn, D. C., Eckert, C. M. and Clarkson, P. J., Understanding Design Process Robustness: A Modelling Approach, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED'07, 28 - 31 August 2007, Cité des Sciences et de l'Industrie, Paris, France, 2007.
21. Cho, S. and Eppinger, S. D., Product Development Process Modeling Using Advanced Simulation. Proceedings of ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, 2001.
22. Pritsker, A.A.B., GERT: Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique, The RAND Corporation, RM-4973-NASA, April 1966.
23. Kusiak, A. and Yang, H., Modelling the Design Process with Petri Nets, in Concurrent Engineering: Contemporary Issues and Modern Design Tools, Parsaei HR and Sullivan WG (eds.), Chapman and Hall, 1993.
24. Integration Definition for Function Modelling (IDEF0), Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS) Publication 183, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1993.
25. Carrascosa, M., Eppinger, S. D. and Whitney, D. E., Using the Design Structure Matrix to Estimate Product Development Time, Proceedings of DETC'98 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, September 13-16, 1998.
26. Clarkson, P. J. and Hamilton, J. R., Signposting: A Parameter-driven Task-based Model of the Design Process, Research in Engineering Design, 12(1), pp. 18-38, 2001.
27. Chung M.J., Kwon P. and Pentland B.T., Making Process Visible: A Grammatical Approach to Managing Design Processes, Journal of Mechanical Design Vol. 124, pp. 364-374, 2002.
28. Levardy, V, Browning, T. R., Adaptive Test Process - Designing a Project Plan that Adapts to the State of a Project. INCOSE 2005.
29. Olsen, J., Cagan, J. and Kotovsky, K., Unlocking Organisational Potential: A Computational Platform for Investigating Structural Interdependence in Design, Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006 ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, September 10-13, 2006.
30. Cooper, K. G., The Rework Cycle: How it Really Works and Reworks PM-Network, Feb 1993.