Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: A study of practitioners' perspectives

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 401-406

  Zandieh, Stephanie O ^a,b   Abramson, Erika L ^a,c   Pfoh, Elizabeth R ^a   Yoon Flannery, Kay ^a   Edwards, Alison ^a   Kaushal, Rainu ^a,c  

^a WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG SAFETY; DRUG SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NORMAL HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; SATISFACTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL;

ADULT; AMBULATORY CARE INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; NEW YORK CITY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; WORKFLOW;

EID: 84862595543     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000333     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bates DW. The quality case for information technology in healthcare. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2002;2:7.
2. Bates DW. Physicians and ambulatory electronic health records. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:1180-9.
3. Bates DW, Gawande AA. Improving safety with information technology. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2526-34.
4. Meaningful Use. (accessed 6 Oct 2010). Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. http://www.cms.gov/EHRincentivePrograms/35_Meaningful_Use.asp
5. Key Capabilities of an Electronic Health Record System: Letter Report. (accessed 22 Jan 2007). http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10781.html
6. Crosson JC, Isaacson N, Lancaster D, et al. Variation in electronic prescribing implementation among twelve ambulatory practices. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:364-71.
7. Kaushal R, Bates DW, Jenter CA, et al. Imminent adopters of electronic health records in ambulatory care. Inform Prim Care 2009;17:7-15.
8. Stream GR. Trends in adoption of electronic health records by family physicians in Washington State. Inform Prim Care 2009;17:145-52.
9. Zandieh SO, Yoon-Flannery K, Kuperman GJ, et al. Challenges to EHR implementation in electronic- versus paper-based office practices. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:755-61.
10. Abramson EL, Malhotra S, Fischer K, et al. Transitioning between electronic health records: effects on ambulatory prescribing safety. J Gen Intern Med 2011;26:868-74.
11. Bloomrosen M, Starren J, Lorenzi NM, et al. Anticipating and addressing the unintended consequences of health IT and policy: a report from the AMIA 2009 Health Policy Meeting. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2011;18:82-90.
12. Cheriff AD, Kapur AG, Qiu M, et al. Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group. Int J Med Inform 2010;79:492-500.
13. Devine EB, Wilson-Norton JL, Lawless NM, et al. Implementing an ambulatory e-prescribing system: strategies employed and lessons learned to minimize unintended consequences. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 4: Technology and Medication Safety) Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, et al, eds. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2008.
14. Menachemi N. Barriers to ambulatory EHR: who are 'imminent adopters' and how do they differ from other physicians? Inform Prim Care 2006;14:101-8.
15. Arvary GJ. The limited use of digital ink in the private-sector primary care physician's office. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1999;6:134-42.
16. Dansky KH, Gamm LD, Vasey JJ, et al. Electronic medical records: are physicians ready? J Healthc Manag 1999;44:440-54; discussion 54-5.
17. Buntin MB, Burke MF, Hoaglin MC, et al. The benefits of health information technology: a review of the recent literature shows predominantly positive results. Health Aff (Millwood) 2011;30:464-71.
18. Davis K, Doty MM, Shea K, et al. Health information technology and physician perceptions of quality of care and satisfaction. Health Policy 2009;90:239-46.
19. O'Connell RT, Cho C, Shah N, et al. Take note(s): differential EHR satisfaction with two implementations under one roof. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2004;11:43-9.
20. Penrod LE, Gadd CS. Attitudes of academic-based and community-based physicians regarding EMR use during outpatient encounters. Proc AMIA Symp 2001:528-32.
21. Menachemi N, Powers T, Au DW, et al. Predictors of physician satisfaction among electronic health record system users. J Healthc Qual 2010;32:35-41.
22. Terry AL, Giles G, Brown JB, et al. Adoption of electronic medical records in family practice: the providers' perspective. Fam Med 2009;41:508-12.
23. Terry AL, Thorpe CF, Giles G, et al. Implementing electronic health records: key factors in primary care. Can Fam Physician 2008;54:730-6.
24. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory careea national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med 2008;359:50-60.
25. Hing ES, Burt CW, Woodwell DA. Electronic medical record use by office-based physicians and their practices: United States, 2006. Adv Data 2007;26:1-7.
26. Miller RH, Sim I. Physicians' use of electronic medical records: barriers and solutions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2004;23:116-26.
27. Simon SR, Soran CS, Kaushal R, et al. Physicians' usage of key functions in electronic health records from 2005 to 2007: a statewide survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2009;16:465-70.
28. Baron RJ. Meaningful use of health information technology is managing information. JAMA 2010;304:89-90.
29. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1477-9.
30. Jha AK, Ferris TG, Donelan K, et al. How common are electronic health records in the United States? A summary of the evidence. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25: w496-507.