The limited use of digital ink in the private-sector primary care physician's office

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 134-142

  Arvary, Gary J ^a  

^a NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIGITAL COMPUTER; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; REVIEW; STANDARDIZATION; TELEPHONE;

EID: 0032998583     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jamia.1999.0060134     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Board of Directors of the American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA). The standards for medical identifiers, codes and messages needed to create an efficient computer-stored medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1993;1(1): 1-7.
2. Family Practice Statistics. Fam Pract Manage. 1997:4.6.
3. SNOMED Web site. Available at: http//www.snomed.org. Accessed Jan 7, 1998.
4. Martin S. Pay denied in E&M audits. Am Med News. Apr 6, 1998;41:13.
5. Poon A, Weber K, Cass T. Scribbler: a tool for searching digital ink. Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction 1995 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Available at: http://www.acm.org/sigchi95. Accessed Jan 7, 1998.
6. Bauer D. Pen-based computing. Med Software Rev. 1994; 3(12):1-3.
7. Strain J, Acuff R, Rindfleisch T, Fagan L. Pen-driven, mobile surgical data base: design and implications. CAMIS Web site. Available at: http://smi-web.stanford.edu/projects/camis/m. Accessed Dec 30, 1997.
8. Rindfleisch T, Fagan L, Acuff R. Mobile clinical computing: description of clinical applications of mobile computing technologies (primarily pen-based systems) at CAMIS. CAMIS Web site. Available at: http://smi-web.stanford.edu/projects/camisn/m. Accessed Dec 30, 1997.
9. Giangrasso D. Why mobile technology is especially well suited for the healthcare industry. Pen Computing. 1998; 5(20):30.
10. Pen OP Web site. Available at: http://www.penop.com. Accessed Jan 6, 1998.
11. Poon A, Campbell K, Fagan L. Pen-Ivory: the design for a pen-based system for progress note creation. Proc AMIA Spring Congress. Bethesda, Md.: AMIA, 1994:99.
12. Private office audit by American Group Practice Inc., New York, 1996.
13. Medical Group Practice Association. Report Based on 1996 Data. 1997:152.
14. Sandrick K. Calculating ROI for CPRs. Health Manage Technol. 1998;19(6):16-20.
15. Wilson R, Fulmer T. Introduction of wireless pen-based computing among visiting nurses in the inner city: a qualitative study. J Commun Health Nurs. 1997;14(1):23-37.
16. The New Zealand Health Information Service. Electronic Medical Records. NZHIS Web site. Available at: http://www.nzh.s.govt.nz/publications/emr. Accessed Jan 27, 1998.
17. Health Care Group. 1997 Staff Salary Survey, Northeast Region. Plymouth Meeting, Pa.: The Health Care Group, 1998: 79.
18. Moore K, Henry L. Exam documentation just got harder. Fam Pract Manage. 1997;4(9):75-85.
19. Poljak A, Miller P. Comparing the data model of MLP vocabulary to SNOMED III for capturing historical and physical exam data at point of care. AMIA Fall Symposium 1997, Session S57, Poster Session II. Available at: http://medicine.ucsd.edu/f97/D004033.htm. Accessed Feb 22, 1998.
20. Aydin C, Roser P, Felitti V. Transforming information use in preventive medicine: learning to balance technology with the art of caring. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994:563-7.
21. Rindfleisch T, Fagan L, Acuff R. Mobile clinical computing: overview. CAMIS Web site. Available at: 〈http://smi-web. stanford.edu/projects/camisn/m. Accessed Dec 30, 1997.
22. Smith W, Zastro R. User requirements for the computer patient record: physician opinions. Proc AMIA Spring Congress. Bethesda, Md.: AMIA, 1994:56.
23. Brownbridge A, Lilford S. Use of a computer to take bookings histories in a hospital antenatal clinic. Med Care. 1988; 26:474-87.
24. Chin H, Drall M. Implementation of a comprehensive computer-based patient records system in Kaiser Permanente's northwest region. MD Comput. 1996;14(1):41-5.
25. Huang M. Grooming and harvesting an electronic medical record system. Microsoft Healthcare Users Group Conference; Sep 15-18, 1997; Las Vegas, Nevada.
26. Johnson G, Levenkron J, Suchman A, Manchester R. Does physician uncertainty affect patient satisfaction? J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3(2):144-9.
27. Anderson EG. A new malpractice defense: common sense. Postgrad Med. 1996;100(1):29-30.
28. Halam L. A review of use of the telephone in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1989;6(1):47-67.
29. Richards E. Law and the physician: a practical guide. The Medical and Public Health Law Web site. Available at: http://plaque.law.umkc.edu. Accessed Jan 6, 1998.
30. Trollor J. How I manage the telephone. Aust Fam Phys. 1991;20(4):407-8.
31. White B. The case for computerized practice. Fam Pract Manage. 1997;4(6):61-7, 71.
32. Moorman P, Siersema P, van Ginnekan A. Comparing free-text reporting to structured data entry. Proc AMIA Spring Congress. Bethesda, Md.: AMIA, 1995:71.
33. Moorman P, Van Ginnekan A, Vanderlei J, Van Beunnel J. A model for structured data entry based on explicit descriptional knowledge. Methods Inform Med. 1994;33(5): 454-63.
34. Marietti C. Point/counterpoint. Healthcare Inform. 1998; 15(5):84-94.
35. Rissover J. Six electronic medical records systems. Med Software Rev. 1997;6(2):1-8.