A virtual plant that responds to the environment like a real one: The case for chrysanthemum

New Phytologist

Volumn 195, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 384-395

  Kang, Mengzhen ^a   Heuvelink, Ep ^b   Carvalho, Susana M P ^b,c   de Reffye, Philippe ^d  

^a INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION   (China)

^b WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA PORTUGUESA   (Portugal)

^d UMR AMAP   (France)

Author keywords

Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.; Functional structural plant model; GreenLab; Model calibration; Secondary growth; Sink source ratio; Validation; Virtual plant

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; CALIBRATION; DICOTYLEDON; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; FLOWERING; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; TEMPERATURE EFFECT;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; CHRYSANTHEMUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWER; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; KINETICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; TEMPERATURE;

BIOMASS; CHRYSANTHEMUM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENVIRONMENT; FLOWERS; KINETICS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHENOTYPE; TEMPERATURE;

CHRYSANTHEMUM; CHRYSANTHEMUM X MORIFOLIUM;

EID: 84862548062     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04177.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams SR, Pearson S, Hadley P. 1998. The effect of temperature on inflorescence initiation and subsequent development in chrysanthemum cv. Snowdon (Chrysanthemum×morifolium Ramat.). Scientia Horticulturae 77: 59-72.
2. Allen M, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong T. 2005. Using L-systems for modeling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-peach model. New Phytologist 166: 869-880.
3. Carvalho SMP, Abi-Tarabay H, Heuvelink E. 2005. Temperature affects chrysanthemum flower characteristics differently during three phases of the cultivation period. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 80: 209-216.
4. Carvalho SMP, Heuvelink E. 2001. Influence of greenhouse climate and plant density on external quality of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflorum (Ramat.) Kitamura): first step towards a quality model. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 76: 249-258.
5. Carvalho SMP, Heuvelink E. 2003. Effect of assimilate availability on flower characteristics and plant height of cut chrysanthemum: an integrated study. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 78: 711-720.
6. Christophe A, Letort V, Hummel I, Cournède PH, de Reffye P, Lecoeur J. 2008. A model-based analysis of the dynamics of carbon balance at the whole-plant level in Arabidopsis thaliana. Functional Plant Biology 35: 1147-1162.
7. Dong QX, Louarn G, Wang YM, Barczi JF, de Reffye P. 2008. Does the structure-function model GREENLAB deal with crop phenotypic plasticity induced by plant spacing? A case study on tomato Annals of Botany 101: 1195-1206.
8. Eschenbach C. 2005. Emergent properties modelled with the functional structural tree growth model ALMIS: computer experiments on resource gain and use. Ecological Modelling 186: 470-488.
9. Evers JB, Vos J, Yin X, Romero P, van der Putten PEL, Struik PC. 2010. Simulation of wheat growth and development based on organ-level photosynthesis and assimilate allocation. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2203-2216.
10. Guo Y, Ma YT, Zhan ZG, Li BG, Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, de Reffye P. 2006. Parameter optimization and field validation of the functional-structural model GREENLAB for maize. Annals of Botany 97: 217-230.
11. He S, Wu QH, Wen JY, Saunders JR, Paton RC. 2004. A particle swarm optimizer with passive congregation. BioSystems 78: 135-147.
12. Hidén C, Larsen RU. 1994. Predicting flower development in greenhouse grown chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae 58: 123-138.
13. van Ittersum MK, Leffelaar PA, van Keulen H, Kropff MJ, Bastiaans L, Goudriaan J. 2003. On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 201-234.
14. Jacobsen L, Amsen MG. 1992. The effect of temperature and light quality on stem elongation of chrysanthemum. Acta Horticulturae 305: 45-50.
15. Kang MZ, Evers JB, Vos J, de Reffye P. 2008. The derivation of sink functions of wheat organs using the GreenLab model. Annals of Botany 101: 1099-1108.
16. Kang MZ, Heuvelink E, de Reffye P. 2006. Building virtual chrysanthemum based on sink-source relationships: preliminary results. Acta Horticulturae 718: 129-136.
17. Kang MZ, Yang LL, Zhang BG, de Reffye P. 2011. Correlation between dynamic tomato fruit set and source sink ratio: a common relationship for different plant densities and seasons? Annals of Botany 107: 805-815.
18. Karlsson MG, Heins RD. 1994. A model of chrysanthemum stem elongation. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 119: 403-407.
19. Karlsson MG, Heins RD, Erwin JE, Berghage RD, Carlson WH, Biernbaum JA. 1989. Temperature and photosynthetic photon flux influence chrysanthemum shoot development and flower initiation under short-day conditions. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 114: 158-163.
20. Lee JH, Goudriaan J, Challa H. 2003. Using the expolinear growth equation for modelling crop growth in year-round cut chrysanthemum. Annals of Botany 92: 697-708.
21. Lee JH, Heuvelink E. 2003. Simulation of leaf area development based on dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area for cut chrysanthemum. Annals of Botany 91: 319-327.
22. Letort V, Cournède PH, Mathieu A, de Reffye P, Constant T. 2008. Parametric identification of a functional-structural tree growth model and application to beech trees (Fagus sylvatica). Functional Plant Biology 35: 951-963.
23. Lindenmayer A. 1984. Position and temporal control mechanisms in inflorescence development. In: Barlow PW, Carr DJ, eds. Positional controls in plant development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 461-486.
24. Louarn G, Dong QX, Wang YM, Barczi JF, de Reffye P. 2007. Parameter stability of the structural-functional model of GreenLab-Tomato as affected by plant density and biomass data acquisition. In: Fourcaud T, Zhang XP, eds. Plant growth modeling and applications - Proceedings of PMA06. Beijing, China: IEEE Computer Society, 142-148.
25. Ma Y, Wen M, Guo Y, Li B, Cournède PH, de Reffye P. 2008. Parameter optimization and field validation of the functional structural model GreenLab for maize at different population densities. Annals of Botany 101: 1185-1194.
26. Marcelis LFM. 1994. A simulation model for dry matter partitioning in cucumber. Annals of Botany 74: 43-52.
27. Mathieu A, Cournède PH, Letort V, Barthélémy D, de Reffye P. 2009. A dynamic model of plant growth with interactions between development and functional mechanisms to study plant structural plasticity related to trophic competition. Annals of Botany 103: 1173-1186.
28. Měch R, Prusinkiewicz P. 1996. Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. Computer Graphics 30: 397-410.
29. Nothnagl M, Kosiba A, Larsen RU. 2004. Predicting the effect of irradiance and temperature on the flower diameter of greenhouse grown chrysanthemum. Scientia Horticulturae 99: 319-329.
30. Palmer PI, Barnett JJ. 2001. Application of an optimal estimation inverse method to GPS/MET bending angle observations. Journal of Geophysical Research 106: 17147-17160.
31. Paubicki W, Horel K, Longay S, Runions A, Lane B, Měch R, Prusinkiewicz P. 2009. Self-organizing tree models for image synthesis. ACM Transactions on Graphics. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 28: 58.1-58.10.
32. Pearson S, Hadley P, Wheldon AE. 1995. A model of the effect of day and night temperatures on the height of chrysanthemums. Acta Horticulturae 378: 71-79.
33. van der Ploeg A, Heuvelink E. 2006. The influence of temperature on growth and development of chrysanthemum cultivars: a review. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 81: 174-182.
34. Prusinkiewicz P, Lindenmayer A, Hanan J. 1988. Developmental models of herbaceous plants for computer imagery purposes. Computer Graphics 22: 141-150.
35. Prusinkiewicz P, Runions A. 2012. Computational models of plant development and form. New Phytologist 193: 549-569.
36. de Reffye P, Edelin C, Francon J, Jaeger M, Puech C. 1988. Plant models faithful to botanical structure and development. Computer Graphics 22: 151-158.
37. Schoellhorn RK, Barrett JE, Terril AN. 1996. Branching of chrysanthemum cultivars varies with season, temperature, and photosynthetic photon flux. HortScience 31: 74-78.
38. Schouten RE, Carvalho SMP, Heuvelink E, van Kooten O. 2002. Modelling of temperature-controlled internode elongation applied to chrysanthemum. Annals of Botany 90: 353-359.
39. Smith A. 1984. Plants, fractals and formal languages. Computer Graphics 18: 1-10.
40. van Straten G, Challa H, Buwalda F. 2000. Towards user accepted optimal control of greenhouse climate. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 26: 221-238.
41. Trewavas A. 2003. Aspects of plant intelligence. Annals of Botany 92: 1-10.
42. de Visser PHB, van der Heijden GWAM, Marcelis LFM, Carvalho SMP, Heuvelink E. 2006. A functional-structural model of chrysanthemum for prediction of ornamental quality. Acta Horticulturae 718: 59-66.
43. Vos J, Evers JB, Buck-Sorlin GH, Andrieu B, Chelle M, de Visser PHB. 2009. Functional-structural plant modelling: a new versatile tool in crop science. Journal of Experimental Botany 61: 2101-2115.
44. Wang F, Kang MZ, Lu Q, Han H, Letort V, Guo Y, de Reffye P, Li B. 2010. A stochastic model of tree architecture and biomass partitioning: application to Mongolian Scots pines. Annals of Botany 107: 781-792.
45. Yan HP, Kang MZ, de Reffye P, Dingkuhn M. 2004. A dynamic, architectural plant model simulating resource-dependent growth. Annals of Botany 93: 591-602.
46. Yin X, Van Laar HH. 2005. Crop systems dynamics: an ecophysiological simulation model for genotype-by-environment interactions. Wageningen, the Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers.