Simulation of leaf area development based on dry matter partitioning and specific leaf area for cut chrysanthemum

Annals of Botany

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 319-327

  Lee, J H ^a   Heuvelink, E ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chrysanthemum; Dry mass partitioning; Leaf area index; Model; Plant density; Simulation; Specific leaf area

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; DRY MATTER; LEAF AREA INDEX; NICHE PARTITIONING;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOMASS; CHRYSANTHEMUM; CROP; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT LEAF; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEASON; TIME;

BIOMASS; CHRYSANTHEMUM; CROPS, AGRICULTURAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT LEAVES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEASONS; TIME FACTORS;

CHRYSANTHEMUM; RICKETTSIA SP. PAR;

EID: 0037372413     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcg015     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Acock B, Charles-Edwards DA, Sawyer S. 1979. Growth response of a Chrysanthemum crop to the environment. III. Effects of radiation and temperature on dry matter partitioning and photosynthesis. Annals of Botany 44: 289-300.
2. De Jong J, Jansen J. 1992. Genetic differences in relative growth rate and partitioning growth components in Chrysanthemum morifolium. Scientia Horticulturae 49: 267-275.
3. De Koning ANM. 1994. Development and dry matter distribution in glasshouse tomato: a quantitative approach. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
4. De Visser CLM. 1994. ALCEPAS, an onion growth model based on SUCROS87. I. Development of the model. Journal of Horticultural Science 69: 501-518.
5. Gary C, Barczi JF, Bertin N, Tchamitchian M. 1995. Simulation of individual organ growth and development on a tomato plant: a model and a user-friendly interface. Acta Horticulturae 399: 199-205.
6. Heuvelink E. 1996. Tomato growth and yield: quantitative analysis and synthesis. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
7. Heuvelink E. 1999. Evaluation of a dynamic simulation model for tomato crop growth and development. Annals of Botany 83: 413-422.
8. Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM. 1996. Influence of assimilate supply on leaf formation in sweet pepper and tomato. Journal of Horticultural Science 71: 405-414.
9. Heuvelink E, Lee JH, Carvalho SMP. 2001. Modelling visual product quality in cut chrysanthemum. Acta Horticulturae 566: 77-84.
10. Hughes AP, Cockshull KE. 1971. The effects of light intensity and carbon dioxide concentration on the growth of Chrysanthemum morifolium cv. Bright Golden Anne. Annals of Botany 35: 899-914.
11. Hughes AP, Cockshull KE. 1972. Further effects of light intensity, carbon dioxide concentration, and day temperature on the growth of Chrysanthemum morifolium cv. Bright Golden Anne in controlled environments. Annals of Botany 36: 533-550.
12. Karlsson MG, Heins RD. 1992. Chrysanthemum dry matter partitioning patterns along irradiance and temperature gradients. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 72: 307-316.
13. Kropff MJ, Van Laar HH. 1993. Modelling crop-weed interactions. Wallingford: CAB International.
14. Larsen RU, Persson L. 1999. Modelling flower development in greenhouse chrysanthemum cultivars in relation to temperature and response group. Scientia Horticulturae 80: 73-89.
15. Lee JH, Heuvelink E, Challa H. 2002. Effects of planting date and plant density on crop growth in cut chrysanthemum. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 77: 238-247.
16. Lieth JH, Pasian CC. 1991. A simulation model for the growth and development of flowering rose shoots. Scientia Horticulturae 46: 109-128.
17. Maliakal SK, McDonnell K, Dudley SA, Schmitt J. 1999. Effects of red to far-red ratio and plant density on biomass allocation and gas exchange in Impatiens capensis. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160: 723-733.
18. Marcelis LFM. 1994. Fruit growth and dry matter partitioning in cucumber. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
19. Marcelis LFM, Heuvelink E, Goudriaan J. 1998. Modelling biomass production and yield of horticultural crops: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 74: 83-111.
20. 2, plant density and pruning. Journal of Horticultural Science 67: 411-420.
21. Reuben SOWM, Mnzava NA. 1982. Dry matter partitioning in Amaranthus cruentus (L.) Thell. in response to population density. Beitrage zur tropischen Landwirtschaft und Veterinarmedizin 20: 131-134.
22. Roelofs T, Lee JH, Heuvelink E. 2001. Belichtingsniveau chrysant heeft optimum nog niet bereikt [Assimilation light intensity applied in practice in cut chrysanthemum is still sub-optimal]. Vakblad voor de Bloemisterij 18: 48-49.
23. Spaargaren JJ. 2002. De teelt van jaarrond chrysanten [Cultivation of year-round cut chrysanthemums]. Aalsmeer: Spaargaren.
24. Tei F, Scaife A, Aikman DP. 1996. Growth of lettuce, onion, and red beet. 1. Growth analysis, light interception, and radiation use efficiency. Annals of Botany 78: 633-643.
25. Van Henten EJ. 1994. Validation of a dynamic lettuce growth model for greenhouse climate control. Agricultural Systems 45: 55-72.
26. Vos J. 1995. The effects of nitrogen supply and stem density on leaf attributes and stem branching in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Potato Research 38: 271-279.