Does the structure-function model GREENLAB deal with crop phenotypic plasticity induced by plant spacing? A case study on tomato

Annals of Botany

Volumn 101, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1195-1206

  Dong, Qiaoxue ^a   Louarn, Gaëtan ^a,b   Wang, Yiming ^a   Barczi, Jean Francois ^c   De Reffye, Philippe ^c,d  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b INSTITUTE OF AUTOMATION   (China)

^c UMR AMAP   (France)

^d INRIA ROCQUENCOURT   (France)

Author keywords

Competition; Functional structural models; GREENLAB; Parameter stability; Phenotypic plasticity; Planting density; Solanum lycopersicum; Source sink relationship

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GROWTH MODELING; LIGHT EFFECT; MORPHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; PREDICTION; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; SPACING; VEGETABLE;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANUM;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOMATO;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; ECOSYSTEM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MODELS, THEORETICAL;

EID: 48249121879     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcm317     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Allen MT, Prusinkiewicz P, DeJong TM. 2005. Using L-systems for modelling source-sink interactions, architecture and physiology of growing trees: the L-PEACH model. New Phytologist 166: 869-880.
2. Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M. 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56. Rome: FAO.
3. Ballaré CL, Scopel AL, Sanchez RA. 1991. Photocontrol of stem elongation in plant neighbourhoods: effects of photon fluence rate under natural conditions of radiation. Plant Cell and Environment 14: 57-65.
4. Bertin N. 1995. Competition for assimilates and fruit position affect fruit set in indeterminate greenhouse tomato. Annals of botany 75: 55-65.
5. Bonan GB. 1988. The size structure of theoretical plant populations: spatial patterns and neighbourhood effects. Ecology 69: 1721-1730.
6. Bradshaw AD. 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Advances in Genetics 13: 115-155.
7. Brisson N, Gary C, Justes E, Roche R, Mary B, Ripoche D, et al. 2003. An overview of the crop model STICS. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 309-332.
8. Calvert A. 1965. Flower initiation and development in tomato. National Agricultural Advisory Service Quarterly Review 70: 79-98.
9. Corré WJ. 1983. Growth and photomorphogenesis of sun and shade plants. I. The influence of light intensity. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 32: 49-62.
10. Cournède P-H, Mathieu A, Houllier F, Barthélémy D, de Reffye P. 2008. Computing competition for light in the GREENLAB model of plant growth: a contribution to the study of the effects of density on resource acquisition and architectural development. Annals of Botany 101: 1207-1219.
11. De Witt TJ, Scheiner SM. 2004. Phenotypic plasticity: functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Dong QX. 2006. Study on structural-functional modelling of tomato growth based on accurate radiation transfer. PhD Thesis, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China (in Chinese).
13. Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Quilot B, de Reffye P. 2005. Environmental and genetic control of morphogenesis in crops: towards models simulating phenotypic plasticity. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 56: 1289-1302.
14. Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, Kim HK, Tambour L, Clement-Vidal A. 2006. EcoMeristem, a model of morphogenesis and competition among sinks in rice. 2. Simulating genotype responses to phosphorus deficiency. Functional Plant Biology 33: 325-337.
15. Ericsson T. 1995. Growth and shoot:root ratio of seedlings in relation to nutrient availability. Plant and Soil 169: 205-214.
16. Evers JB, Vos J, Fournier C, Andrieu B, Chelle M, Struik PC. 2005. Towards a generic architectural model of tillering in Graminae, as exemplified by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum). New Phytologist 166: 801-812.
17. Fournier C, Andrieu B. 1998. A 3D architectural and process-based model of maize development. Annals of Botany 81: 233-250.
18. Fournier C, Andrieu B, Ljutovac S, Saint-Jean S. 2003. ADEL-Wheat: a 3D architectural model of wheat development. In: Hu BG, Jaeger M. eds. International Symposium on Plant Growth Modelling, Simulation, Visualisation and their Application, Beijing, China. Tsinghua University Press/Springer, 54-63.
19. Gary C, Jones JW, Longuenesse JJ. 1993. Modelling daily changes in specific leaf area of tomato: the contribution of the assimilate pool. Acta Horticulturae 328: 205-210.
20. Gorham E. 1979. Shoot height, weight and standing crop in relation to density of monospecific stands. Nature 279: 148-150.
21. Guichard S, Bertin N, Leonardi C, Gary C. 2001. Tomato fruit quality in relation to water and carbon fluxes. Agronomie 21: 385-392.
22. Guo Y, Ma YT, Zhan ZG, Li BG, Dingkuhn M, Luquet D, de Reffye P. 2006. Parameter optimisation and field validation of the functional-structural model GREENLAB for maize. Annals of Botany 97: 217-230.
23. Guo H, Letort V, Hong L, Fourcaud T, Cournède P-H, Lu Y, de Reffye P. 2007. Adaptation of the GreenLab model for analyzing sink-source relationships in Chinese Pine saplings. In: Fourcaud T, Zhang XP. eds. PMA06 - Plant growth Modeling, simulation, visualization and their Applications. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society, in press.
24. Halle F, Oldeman RAA. 1970. Essai sur l'architecture et la dynamique de croissance des arbres tropicaux. Paris: Masson.
25. Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR. 2002. Future contributions of crop modelling - from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 15-31.
26. Heuvelink E. 1995. Effect of plant density on biomass allocation to the fruits in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Scientia Horticulturae 64: 193-201.
27. Heuvelink E. 1996. Tomato growth and yield: quantitative analysis and synthesis. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
28. Heuvelink E. 2005. Tomatoes. Cambridge, MA: CABI Publishing.
29. Heuvelink E, Marcelis LFM. 1989. Dry matter distribution in tomato and cucumber. Acta Horticulturae 260: 149-180.
30. Howel TA, Musick JT. 1984. Relationship of dry matter production of field crops to water consumption. In: Les besoins en eau des cultures. Conference internationales, Paris, 11-14 Sept., INRA, Paris, France.
31. Jones GA, Kiniry JR. 1986. CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development. Texas: Texas A&M University Press.
32. Jones JW, Dayan E, Allen NH, Van Keulen H, Challa H. 1991. A dynamic tomato growth and yield model (TOMGRO). Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 34: 663-672
33. Kahlen K. 2007. Towards functional-structural modelling of greenhouse cucumber. In: Vos J, et al. eds. Functional-structural plant modelling in crop production. Berlin: Springer 209-217.
34. Kang MZ, Heuvelink E, de Reffye P. 2006. Building virtual chrysanthemum based on sink-source relationships: preliminary results. Acta Horticulturae 718: 129-136.
35. Kolb TE, Steiner KC. 1990. Growth and biomass partitioning response of northern red oak genotypes to shading and grass root competition. Forest Science 36: 293-303.
36. de Koning ANM. 1994. Development and dry matter distribution in glasshouse tomato: a quantitative approach. PhD thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
37. de Koning ANM, de Ruiter HW. 1991. Effect of temperature, plant density and fruit thinning on flower/fruit abortion and dry matter partitioning of tomato. In: Annual report 1990 Glasshouse Crops Research Station, Naaldwijk, The Netherlands.
38. de Kroon H, Huber H, Stuefer JF, Van Groenendael JM. 2005. A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytologist 166: 73-82.
39. Lötscher M, Nösberger J. 1997. Branch and root formation in Trifolium repens is influenced by the light environment of unfolded leaves. Oecologia 111: 499-504.
40. Louarn G, Guedon Y, Lecoeur J, Lebon E. 2007a. Quantitative analysis of the phenotypic variability of shoot architecture in two grapevine (Vitis vinifera) cultivars. Annals of Botany 99: 425-437.
41. Louarn G, Dong QX, Wang YM, Barczi JF, de Reffye P. 2007b. Parameter stability of the structural-functional model Greenlab-Tomato as affected by density and biomass data acquisition. In: Fourcaud T, Zhang XP, eds. PMA06 - Plant growth modeling, simulation, visualization and their applications. Los Alamitos, California: IEEE Computer Society, in press.
42. Ma YT, Li BG, Zhan ZG, Guo Y, Luquet D, de Reffye P, Dingkuhn M. 2007. Parameter stability of the structural-functional plant model GREENLAB as affected by variation within populations, among seasons and among growth stages. Annals of Botany 99: 61-73.
43. Mathieu A, Cournède PH, de Reffye P. 2004. A dynamic model of plant growth with full retroaction between organogenesis and photosynthesis. In: Proceeding of CARI'04, Tunis, Tunisia.
44. Meier U. 1997. Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants. BBCH Monograph. Berlin: Blackwell.
45. Papadopoulos AP, Ormrod DP. 1991. Plant spacing effects on growth and development of the greenhouse tomato. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 71: 297-304.
46. Papadopoulos AP, Pararajasingham S. 1997. The influence of plant spacing on light interception and use in greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.): a review. Scientia Hortticulturae 69: 1-29.
47. Perttunen J, Sievanen R, Nikinmaa E. 1998. LIGNUM: a model combining the structure and the functioning of trees. Ecological Modeling 108: 189-198.
48. Prusinkiewicz P. 1998. Modelling of spatial structure and development of plants: a review. Scientia Horticulturae 74: 113-149.
49. Renton M. 2004. Function, form and frangipanis: modelling the patterns of plant growth. PhD Thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
50. Riha SJ, Wilks DS, Simoens P. 1996. Impact of temperature and precipitation variability on crop model predictions. Climatic Change 32: 293-311.
51. Rodriguez BR, Lambeth VN. 1975. Artificial lighting and spacing as photosynthetic and yield factors in winter greenhouse tomato culture. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 100: 694-697.
52. Scholberg J, McNeal J, Jones JW, Boote KJ, Stanley CD, Obreza TA. 2000. Field-grown tomato - growth and canopy characteristics of field-grown tomato. Agronomy Journal 92: 152-159.
53. Sinoquet H, Thanisawanyangkura S, Mabrouk H, Kasemspa P. 1998. Characterisation of the light environment in canopies using 3D digitising and image processing. Annals of Botany 82: 203-212.
54. Soler C, Sillion FX, Blaise F, de Reffye P. 2003. An efficient instantiation algorithm for simulating radiant energy transfer in plant models. ACM Transactions on Graphics 22: 204-233.
55. Solangaarachchi SM, Harper JL. 1987. The effect of canopy filtered light on the growth of white clover Trifolium repens. Oecologica 72: 372-376.
56. Thornby D, Renton M, Hanan J. 2003. Using computational plant science tools to investigate morphological aspects of compensatory growth. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2660: 708-717
57. Via S, Gomulkiewicz R, De Jong G, Scheiner SM, Schlichting CD, Van Tienderen PH. 1995. Adaptative phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 212-217.
58. Yan HP, Kang MZ, de Reffye P, Dingkuhn M. 2004. A dynamic, architectural plant model simulating resource-dependent growth. Annals of Botany 93: 1-12.
59. Yin X, Stam P, Kropff MJ, Schapendonk AHCM. 2003. Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agronomy Journal 95: 90-98.
60. Zahara M, Timm H. 1973. Influence of plant density on growth, nutrient composition, yield and quality of mechanistically harvested tomatoes. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 98: 513-516.