Morphological differentiation in a common garden experiment among native and non-native specimens of the invasive weed yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis)

Biological Invasions

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1459-1467

  Eriksen, Renée L ^a   Desronvil, Theodora ^a   Hierro, José L ^b   Kesseli, Rick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PAMPA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

AMOVA; F ST Q ST; Invasive species; Local adaptation; Neutral EST SSR markers; Post invasion selection

Indexed keywords

GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; INVASIVE SPECIES; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MORPHOLOGY; NATIVE SPECIES; WEED;

ARGENTINA; CALIFORNIA; GEORGIA (REPUBLIC); TURKEY; UNITED STATES;

CENTAUREA; CENTAUREA SOLSTITIALIS;

EID: 84862523606     PISSN: 13873547     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-012-0172-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andonian K, Hierro JL (2011) Species interactions contribute to the success of a global plant invader. Biol Invasions 13: 2957-2965.
2. Beerli P (2009) How to use migrate or why are Markov chain Monte Carlo programs difficult to use? In: Bertorelle G, Bruford MW, Haue HC, Rizzoli A, Vernesi C (eds) Conservation biology: population genetics for animal conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42-79.
3. Beerli P, Palczewski M (2010) United framework to evaluate panmixia and migration direction among multiple sampling locations. Genetics 185: 313-326.
4. Bossdorf O, Auge H, Lafuma L, Rogers WE, Siemann E, Prati D (2005) Phenotypic and genetic differentiation between native and introduced plant populations. Oecologia 144: 1-11.
5. Colautti RI, Maron JL, Barrett SCH (2008) Common garden comparisons of native and introduced plant populations: latitudinal clines can obscure evolutionary inferences. Evol Appl 2(2): 187-199.
6. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2007) Molecular and quantitative trait variation across the native range of the invasive species Hypericum canariense: evidence for ancient patterns of colonization via pre-adaptation? Mol Ecol 16: 4269-4283.
7. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008a) Invading populations of an ornamental shrub show rapid life history evolution despite genetic bottlenecks. Ecol Lett 11: 701-709.
8. Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008b) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17: 431-449.
9. ST is misleading. Or is it? Mol Ecol 20: 1805-1812.
10. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite v. 3. 5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10: 564-567.
11. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
12. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005) Arlequin ver. 3. 0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online 1: 47-50.
13. Gerlach JD (1997) The introduction, dynamics of geographic range expansion, and ecosystem effects of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Proc Calif Weed Conf 49: 136-141.
14. Hartl DL, Clark AG (2007) Principles of population genetics, 4th edn. Sinaur Associates, Sunderland, MA.
15. Hierro JL, Villarreal D, Eren O, Graham JM, Callaway RM (2006) Disturbance facilitates invasion: the effects are stronger abroad than at home. Am Nat 168: 144-156.
16. Hierro JL, Eren O, Khetsuriani K, Diaconu K, Torok K, Montesinos D, Andonian K, Kikodze D, Janoian L, Villarreal D, Estanga-Mollica ME, Callaway RM (2009) Germination responses of an invasive species in native and non-native ranges. Oikos 118: 529-538.
17. Kane NC, Rieseberg LH (2008) Genetics and evolution of weedy Helianthus annuus populations: adaptation of an agricultural weed. Mol Ecol 17(1): 384-394.
18. Lai Z, Kane NC, Zou Y, Rieseberg LH (2008) Natural variation in gene expression between wild and weedy populations of Helianthus annuus. Genetics 179(4): 1881-1890.
19. Merilä J, Crnokrak P (2001) Comparison of genetic differentiation at marker loci and quantitative traits. J Evol Biol 14: 892-903.
20. Müller-Schärer H, Schaffner U, Steinger U (2004) Evolution in invasive plants: implications for biological control. Trends Ecol Evol 19(8): 417-422.
21. ST estimates: problems and some solutions. Genetics 171: 1331-1339.
22. Pitcairn MJ, Schoenig S (2006) Yellow starthistle continues its spread in California. Calif Agric 60: 83-90.
23. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 223-225.
24. Sun M (1997) Population genetic structure of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a colonizing weed in the western United States. Can J Bot 75: 1470-1478.
25. Sun M, Ritland K (1998) Mating system of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a successful colonizer in North America. Heredity 80: 225-232.
26. Uygur S, Smith L, Uygur FN, Cristofaro M, Balciunas J (2004) Population densities of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis) in Turkey. Weed Sci 52: 746-753.
27. Vogel S (1970) Convective cooling at low airspeeds and the shapes of broad leaves. J Exp Bot 21(66): 91-101.
28. ST. Mol Ecol 17: 1885-1896.
29. Widmer TL, Guermache F, Dolgovskaia MY, Reznik SY (2007) Enhanced growth and seed properties in introduced vs. native populations of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis). Weed Sci 55: 465-473.